These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35472130)

  • 1. DeepGaze III: Modeling free-viewing human scanpaths with deep learning.
    Kümmerer M; Bethge M; Wallis TSA
    J Vis; 2022 Apr; 22(5):7. PubMed ID: 35472130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Saccadic model of eye movements for free-viewing condition.
    Le Meur O; Liu Z
    Vision Res; 2015 Nov; 116(Pt B):152-64. PubMed ID: 25724662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Representative Scanpath Identification for Group Viewing Pattern Analysis.
    Li A; Chen Z
    J Eye Mov Res; 2018 Nov; 11(6):. PubMed ID: 33828715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of initial fixation position in scene viewing.
    Rothkegel LO; Trukenbrod HA; Schütt HH; Wichmann FA; Engbert R
    Vision Res; 2016 Dec; 129():33-49. PubMed ID: 27771330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fixation-dependent memory for natural scenes: an experimental test of scanpath theory.
    Foulsham T; Kingstone A
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2013 Feb; 142(1):41-56. PubMed ID: 22506754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. It depends on how you look at it: scanpath comparison in multiple dimensions with MultiMatch, a vector-based approach.
    Dewhurst R; Nyström M; Jarodzka H; Foulsham T; Johansson R; Holmqvist K
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Dec; 44(4):1079-100. PubMed ID: 22648695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Controlled scanpath variation alters fusiform face activation.
    Morris JP; Pelphrey KA; McCarthy G
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2007 Mar; 2(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 18176625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predicting Human Saccadic Scanpaths Based on Iterative Representation Learning.
    Xia C; Han J; Qi F; Shi G
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2019 Jul; 28(7):3502-3515. PubMed ID: 30735998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Eye movement control during scene viewing: immediate effects of scene luminance on fixation durations.
    Henderson JM; Nuthmann A; Luke SG
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr; 39(2):318-22. PubMed ID: 23276111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The central fixation bias in scene viewing: selecting an optimal viewing position independently of motor biases and image feature distributions.
    Tatler BW
    J Vis; 2007 Nov; 7(14):4.1-17. PubMed ID: 18217799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. SoftMatch: Comparing Scanpaths Using Combinatorial Spatio-Temporal Sequences with Fractal Curves.
    Newport RA; Russo C; Liu S; Suman AA; Di Ieva A
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Sep; 22(19):. PubMed ID: 36236535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The attenuated visual scanpaths of patients with schizophrenia whilst recognizing emotional facial expressions are worsened in natural social scenes.
    Li XB; Jiang WL; Wen YJ; Wang CM; Tian Q; Fan Y; Yang HB; Wang CY
    Schizophr Res; 2020 Jun; 220():155-163. PubMed ID: 32265087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spatial statistics and attentional dynamics in scene viewing.
    Engbert R; Trukenbrod HA; Barthelmé S; Wichmann FA
    J Vis; 2015 Jan; 15(1):15.1.14. PubMed ID: 25589298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evidence for a global scanpath strategy in viewing abstract compared with realistic images.
    Zangemeister WH; Sherman K; Stark L
    Neuropsychologia; 1995 Aug; 33(8):1009-25. PubMed ID: 8524451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What can saliency models predict about eye movements? Spatial and sequential aspects of fixations during encoding and recognition.
    Foulsham T; Underwood G
    J Vis; 2008 Feb; 8(2):6.1-17. PubMed ID: 18318632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Individual differences in Scanpaths correspond with serotonin transporter genotype and behavioral phenotype in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).
    Gibboni RR; Zimmerman PE; Gothard KM
    Front Behav Neurosci; 2009; 3():50. PubMed ID: 19949466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Introducing context-dependent and spatially-variant viewing biases in saccadic models.
    Le Meur O; Coutrot A
    Vision Res; 2016 Apr; 121():72-84. PubMed ID: 26898752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How task demands influence scanpath similarity in a sequential number-search task.
    Dewhurst R; Foulsham T; Jarodzka H; Johansson R; Holmqvist K; Nyström M
    Vision Res; 2018 Aug; 149():9-23. PubMed ID: 29857021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On metrics for measuring scanpath similarity.
    Fahimi R; Bruce NDB
    Behav Res Methods; 2021 Apr; 53(2):609-628. PubMed ID: 32779104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Gravitational Laws of Focus of Attention.
    Zanca D; Melacci S; Gori M
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2020 Dec; 42(12):2983-2995. PubMed ID: 31180885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.