These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

379 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35472836)

  • 1. A decision-making framework for evaluating environmental tradeoffs in enhancing ecosystem services across complex agricultural landscapes.
    Acero Triana JS; Chu ML; Shipley NJ; van Riper CJ; Stewart WP; Suski CD
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Jul; 314():115077. PubMed ID: 35472836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Local Residents' Perceptions for Ecosystem Services: A Case Study of Fenghe River Watershed.
    Zhang H; Pang Q; Long H; Zhu H; Gao X; Li X; Jiang X; Liu K
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Sep; 16(19):. PubMed ID: 31561464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Agricultural conservation may not help Midwestern US freshwater biodiversity in a changing climate.
    Dai Q; Cao Y; Chu ML; Larson ER; Suski CD
    Sci Total Environ; 2023 May; 872():162143. PubMed ID: 36773923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Integrated modeling of agricultural scenarios (IMAS) to support pesticide action plans: the case of the Coulonge drinking water catchment area (SW France).
    Vernier F; Leccia-Phelpin O; Lescot JM; Minette S; Miralles A; Barberis D; Scordia C; Kuentz-Simonet V; Tonneau JP
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Mar; 24(8):6923-6950. PubMed ID: 27726081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Scenarios reveal pathways to sustain future ecosystem services in an agricultural landscape.
    Qiu J; Carpenter SR; Booth EG; Motew M; Zipper SC; Kucharik CJ; Chen X; Loheide SP; Seifert J; Turner MG
    Ecol Appl; 2018 Jan; 28(1):119-134. PubMed ID: 28944518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A multicriteria evaluation approach to set forest restoration priorities based on water ecosystem services.
    Valente RA; de Mello K; Metedieri JF; Américo C
    J Environ Manage; 2021 May; 285():112049. PubMed ID: 33578210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Social preferences for ecosystem services in a biodiversity hotspot in South America.
    Bidegain I; Cerda C; Catalán E; Tironi A; López-Santiago C
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(4):e0215715. PubMed ID: 31009505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Integrating stakeholders' perspectives and spatial modelling to develop scenarios of future land use and land cover change in northern Tanzania.
    Kariuki RW; Munishi LK; Courtney-Mustaphi CJ; Capitani C; Shoemaker A; Lane PJ; Marchant R
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0245516. PubMed ID: 33577608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Integrating principles and tools of decision science into value-driven watershed planning for compensatory mitigation.
    Sanchez GM; Eaton MJ; Garcia AM; Keisman J; Ullman K; Blackwell J; Meentemeyer RK
    Ecol Appl; 2023 Mar; 33(2):e2766. PubMed ID: 36268592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A methodological approach for deriving regional crop rotations as basis for the assessment of the impact of agricultural strategies using soil erosion as example.
    Lorenz M; Fürst C; Thiel E
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Sep; 127 Suppl():S37-47. PubMed ID: 23751946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An integrated approach to monitoring ecosystem services and agriculture: implications for sustainable agricultural intensification in Rwanda.
    Rosa MF; Bonham CA; Dempewolf J; Arakwiye B
    Environ Monit Assess; 2017 Jan; 189(1):15. PubMed ID: 27975330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modifying the Soil and Water Assessment Tool to simulate cropland carbon flux: model development and initial evaluation.
    Zhang X; Izaurralde RC; Arnold JG; Williams JR; Srinivasan R
    Sci Total Environ; 2013 Oct; 463-464():810-22. PubMed ID: 23859899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Collaborative environmental planning in river management: an application of multicriteria decision analysis in the White River Watershed in Vermont.
    Hermans C; Erickson J; Noordewier T; Sheldon A; Kline M
    J Environ Manage; 2007 Sep; 84(4):534-46. PubMed ID: 17029759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Integrating decision-making preferences into ecosystem service conservation area identification: A case study of water-related ecosystem services in the Dawen River watershed, China.
    Li K; Hou Y; Fu Q; Randall MT; Andersen PS; Qiu M; Skov-Petersen H
    J Environ Manage; 2023 Aug; 340():117972. PubMed ID: 37126921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stakeholder participation, indicators, assessment, and decision-making: applying adaptive management at the watershed scale.
    Zuniga-Teran AA; Fisher LA; Meixner T; Le Tourneau FM; Postillion F
    Environ Monit Assess; 2022 Feb; 194(3):156. PubMed ID: 35132454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How do climatic and management factors affect agricultural ecosystem services? A case study in the agro-pastoral transitional zone of northern China.
    Qiao J; Yu D; Wu J
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Feb; 613-614():314-323. PubMed ID: 28917170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pursuing implementation solutions for targeted nitrogen management in agriculture- a novel approach to synthesize knowledge and facilitate sustainable decision making based on collaborative landscape modelling.
    Christensen AA; Andersen PS; Piil K; Andersen E; Vejre H; Graversgaard M
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Sep; 246():679-686. PubMed ID: 31220728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stakeholder preferences for payments for ecosystem services (PES) versus other environmental management approaches for mangrove forests.
    Thompson BS; Friess DA
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Mar; 233():636-648. PubMed ID: 30599416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Long-term impact of conservation agriculture and diversified maize rotations on carbon pools and stocks, mineral nitrogen fractions and nitrous oxide fluxes in inceptisol of India.
    Parihar CM; Parihar MD; Sapkota TB; Nanwal RK; Singh AK; Jat SL; Nayak HS; Mahala DM; Singh LK; Kakraliya SK; Stirling CM; Jat ML
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Nov; 640-641():1382-1392. PubMed ID: 30021305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A priory allocation of ecosystem services to forest stands in a forest management context considering scientific suitability, stakeholder engagement and sustainability concept with multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) technique: A case study in Turkey.
    Başkent EZ; Balci H
    J Environ Manage; 2024 Oct; 369():122230. PubMed ID: 39197346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.