214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35474701)
1. Quality and readability of online patient information on treatment for erectile dysfunction.
Pattenden TA; Raleigh RA; Pattenden ER; Thangasamy IA
BJUI Compass; 2021 Nov; 2(6):412-418. PubMed ID: 35474701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure: an assessment of the quality and readability of online information.
Lim SJM; Kelly M; Selvarajah L; Murray M; Scanlon T
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 May; 21(1):149. PubMed ID: 33952225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quality and accuracy of patient-oriented Web-based information regarding tooth avulsion.
Nangia D; Saini A; Krishnan A; Sharma S; Kumar V; Chawla A; Logani A
Dent Traumatol; 2022 Aug; 38(4):299-308. PubMed ID: 35225429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of the quality and readability of online information on autopsy for the general public: a cross-sectional analysis.
Hanley B; Brown P; O'Neill S; Osborn M
BMJ Open; 2019 May; 9(5):e023804. PubMed ID: 31152026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Analysis of the quality, accuracy, and readability of patient information on polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) on the internet available in English: a cross-sectional study.
Vågenes H; Pranić SM
Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2023 May; 21(1):44. PubMed ID: 37189154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Glioblastoma: assessment of the readability and reliability of online information.
Ahmadi O; Louw J; Leinonen H; Gan PYC
Br J Neurosurg; 2021 Oct; 35(5):551-554. PubMed ID: 33769170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing the quality and readability of online content on shock wave therapy for erectile dysfunction.
Reddy RV; Golan R; Loloi J; Diaz P; Saltzman RG; Watane A; Ramasamy R
Andrologia; 2022 Dec; 54(11):e14607. PubMed ID: 36240784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A systematic review of internet-based information on dermatomyositis and polymyositis.
Haque A; Cox M; Sandler RD; Hughes M
Int J Rheum Dis; 2020 Dec; 23(12):1613-1618. PubMed ID: 32812386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Quality, Readability, and Technical Quality of Online Information on Glaucoma.
Shah R; Mahajan J; Oydanich M; Khouri AS
Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2023; 6(1):93-99. PubMed ID: 35940574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quality, Reliability, and Readability of Online Information on Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.
Hassan AK; Eleiwa TK; Hassan MA; Sallam AB; Ali HT; Abdelnaem S; Gise R; Phillips PH; Elhusseiny AM
J Neuroophthalmol; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38527126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Readability and Quality of Web-Based Patient Information on Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Quantitative Content Analysis.
Tan DJY; Ko TK; Fan KS
JMIR Form Res; 2023 Nov; 7():e47762. PubMed ID: 38010802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of Online Patient Education Material About Dysphagia.
Steiner SM; Slavych BK; Zraick RI
Dysphagia; 2023 Jun; 38(3):990-1000. PubMed ID: 36205800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Patient-Directed Vasectomy Information: How Readable Is It?
Kianian R; Hu MY; Lavold AJ; Andino JJ; Morrison JC; Eleswarapu SV; Mills JN
World J Mens Health; 2024 Apr; 42(2):408-414. PubMed ID: 37853530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cosmetic facial surgery: are online resources reliable and do patients understand them?
Awal DH; Mills C
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Feb; 56(2):124-128. PubMed ID: 29307586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of the Readability and Quality of Online Information for Patients and Their Families Regarding Schizophrenia.
Ekinci O; Koyuncu AN
J Nerv Ment Dis; 2024 May; 212(5):278-283. PubMed ID: 38416420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Online Patient Education Materials for Orthognathic Surgery Fail to Meet Readability and Quality Standards.
Lee KC; Berg ET; Jazayeri HE; Chuang SK; Eisig SB
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Jan; 77(1):180.e1-180.e8. PubMed ID: 30296407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating the readability, understandability, and quality of online materials about chest pain in children.
Arslan D; Tutar MS; Kozanhan B
Eur J Pediatr; 2020 Dec; 179(12):1881-1891. PubMed ID: 32894353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Readability, reliability and credibility of online patient information on skin grafts.
Heaven CL; Patel C; Ahmadi O; Mathy JA
Australas J Dermatol; 2023 Feb; 64(1):e57-e64. PubMed ID: 36354108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cauda equina syndrome: assessing the readability and quality of patient information on the Internet.
O'Neill SC; Baker JF; Fitzgerald C; Fleming C; Rowan F; Byrne D; Synnott K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 May; 39(10):E645-9. PubMed ID: 24583736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Systematic Evaluation of the Quality, Accuracy, and Reliability of Internet Websites about Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.
Saleh D; Fisher JH; Provencher S; Liang Z; Ryerson CJ; Weatherald J
Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2022 Aug; 19(8):1404-1413. PubMed ID: 34813417
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
