141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35475365)
1. Exploring the Limitations of Osmotically Assisted Reverse Osmosis: Membrane Fouling and the Limiting Flux.
Peters CD; Li D; Mo Z; Hankins NP; She Q
Environ Sci Technol; 2022 May; 56(10):6678-6688. PubMed ID: 35475365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evidence, Determination, and Implications of Membrane-Independent Limiting Flux in Forward Osmosis Systems.
Morrow CP; Childress AE
Environ Sci Technol; 2019 Apr; 53(8):4380-4388. PubMed ID: 30887806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Relating reverse and forward solute diffusion to membrane fouling in osmotically driven membrane processes.
She Q; Jin X; Li Q; Tang CY
Water Res; 2012 May; 46(7):2478-86. PubMed ID: 22386887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Energy Consumption of Osmotically Assisted Reverse Osmosis and Low-Salt-Rejection Reverse Osmosis for Brine Management.
Wang Z; Feng D; Chen Y; He D; Elimelech M
Environ Sci Technol; 2021 Aug; 55(15):10714-10723. PubMed ID: 34269563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Osmotic cleaning of typical inorganic and organic foulants on reverse osmosis membrane for textile printing and dyeing wastewater treatment.
Hu Z; Guan D; Sun Z; Zhang Z; Shan Y; Wu Y; Gong C; Ren X
Chemosphere; 2023 Sep; 336():139162. PubMed ID: 37290520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes by dairy industry effluents.
Turan M; Ates A; Inanc B
Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(12):355-60. PubMed ID: 12201123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Investigations of inorganic and organic fouling behaviors, antifouling and cleaning strategies for pressure retarded osmosis (PRO) membrane using seawater desalination brine and wastewater.
Han G; Zhou J; Wan C; Yang T; Chung TS
Water Res; 2016 Oct; 103():264-275. PubMed ID: 27470469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of tannic acid on membrane fouling and membrane cleaning in forward osmosis.
Zhang W; Wang L; Dong B
Water Sci Technol; 2017 Dec; 76(11-12):3160-3170. PubMed ID: 29210702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hybrid osmotically assisted reverse osmosis and reverse osmosis (OARO-RO) process for minimal liquid discharge of high strength nitrogenous wastewater and enrichment of ammoniacal nitrogen.
Gonzales RR; Nakagawa K; Kumagai K; Hasegawa S; Matsuoka A; Li Z; Mai Z; Yoshioka T; Hori T; Matsuyama H
Water Res; 2023 Nov; 246():120716. PubMed ID: 37837900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fouling distribution in forward osmosis membrane process.
Lee J; Kim B; Hong S
J Environ Sci (China); 2014 Jun; 26(6):1348-54. PubMed ID: 25079847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Osmotically assisted reverse osmosis, simulated to achieve high solute concentrations, at low energy consumption.
H M Beigi B; Gadkari S; Sadhukhan J
Sci Rep; 2022 Aug; 12(1):13741. PubMed ID: 35962008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Design considerations for wastewater treatment by reverse osmosis.
Bartels CR; Wilf M; Andes K; Iong J
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):473-82. PubMed ID: 16004010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Theoretical and Experimental Analysis of Osmotically Assisted Reverse Osmosis for Minimum Liquid Discharge.
Ju J; Lee S; Kim Y; Cho H; Lee S
Membranes (Basel); 2023 Sep; 13(10):. PubMed ID: 37887986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating an on-line cleaning agent for mitigating organic fouling in a reverse osmosis membrane.
Park S; Hong SM; Park J; You S; Lee Y; Kim E; Cho KH
Chemosphere; 2021 Jul; 275():130033. PubMed ID: 33676278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost Optimization of Osmotically Assisted Reverse Osmosis.
Bartholomew TV; Siefert NS; Mauter MS
Environ Sci Technol; 2018 Oct; 52(20):11813-11821. PubMed ID: 30226376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Natural organic matter separation by forward osmosis: Performance and mechanisms.
Wang L; Li T; Chu H; Zhang W; Huang W; Dong B; Wu D; Chen F
Water Res; 2021 Mar; 191():116829. PubMed ID: 33476800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Membrane fouling and anti-fouling strategies using RO retentate from a municipal water recycling plant as the feed for osmotic power generation.
Chen SC; Amy GL; Chung TS
Water Res; 2016 Jan; 88():144-155. PubMed ID: 26492341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Highly permeable double-skinned forward osmosis membranes for anti-fouling in the emulsified oil-water separation process.
Duong PH; Chung TS; Wei S; Irish L
Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Apr; 48(8):4537-45. PubMed ID: 24621207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Renewable energy powered membrane technology: Implications of adhesive interaction between membrane and organic matter on spontaneous osmotic backwash cleaning.
Cai YH; Gopalakrishnan A; Deshmukh KP; Schäfer AI
Water Res; 2022 Aug; 221():118752. PubMed ID: 35810632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hydrophilic, bactericidal nanoheater-enabled reverse osmosis membranes to improve fouling resistance.
Ray JR; Tadepalli S; Nergiz SZ; Liu KK; You L; Tang Y; Singamaneni S; Jun YS
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2015 Jun; 7(21):11117-26. PubMed ID: 25941970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]