171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35476114)
1. Residual stress estimated by nanoindentation in pontics and abutments of veneered zirconia fixed dental prostheses.
Fardin VP; Bonfante G; Coelho PG; Bergamo ETP; Bordin D; Janal MN; Tovar N; Witek L; Bonfante EA
J Appl Oral Sci; 2022; 30():e20210475. PubMed ID: 35476114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Residual stress of porcelain-fused to zirconia 3-unit fixed dental prostheses measured by nanoindentation.
Fardin VP; Bonfante EA; Coelho PG; Janal MN; Tovar N; Witek L; Bordin D; Bonfante G
Dent Mater; 2018 Feb; 34(2):260-271. PubMed ID: 29258696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of the marginal vertical discrepancies of zirconium and metal ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses before and after cementation.
Gonzalo E; Suárez MJ; Serrano B; Lozano JF
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Dec; 102(6):378-84. PubMed ID: 19961996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fatigue resistance and failure mode of adhesively restored custom metal-composite resin premolar implant abutments.
Boff LL; Oderich E; Cardoso AC; Magne P
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(2):364-73. PubMed ID: 24683562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fracture resistance of crowns cemented on titanium and zirconia implant abutments: a comparison of monolithic versus manually veneered all-ceramic systems.
Martínez-Rus F; Ferreiroa A; Özcan M; Bartolomé JF; Pradíes G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(6):1448-55. PubMed ID: 23189296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-year clinical prospective evaluation of zirconia-based posterior fixed dental prostheses (FDPs).
Beuer F; Edelhoff D; Gernet W; Sorensen JA
Clin Oral Investig; 2009 Dec; 13(4):445-51. PubMed ID: 19169719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance of fixed dental prostheses up to 6 years-A massive data analysis.
Raedel M; Priess HW; Bohm S; Walter MH
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Sep; 128(3):350-354. PubMed ID: 33622552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical efficacy of veneered zirconium dioxide-based posterior partial fixed dental prostheses: five-year results.
Raigrodski AJ; Yu A; Chiche GJ; Hochstedler JL; Mancl LA; Mohamed SE
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Oct; 108(4):214-22. PubMed ID: 23031727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of gingival ceramic veneer thickness on the fracture strength of zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses.
Gabbert O; Ohlmann B; Schmitter M; Farhan D; Becker F; Rammelsberg P
Am J Dent; 2010 Jun; 23(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 20718211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A randomized controlled clinical trial of 3-unit posterior zirconia-ceramic fixed dental prostheses (FDP) with layered or pressed veneering ceramics: 3-year results.
Naenni N; Bindl A; Sax C; Hämmerle C; Sailer I
J Dent; 2015 Nov; 43(11):1365-70. PubMed ID: 26234623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Outcome of posterior fixed dental prostheses made from veneered zirconia over an observation period of up to 13 years.
Passia N; Chaar MS; Kern M
J Dent; 2019 Jul; 86():126-129. PubMed ID: 31150728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of Effect of Connector Designs in Implant Tooth-supported Fixed Partial Denture: A Two-dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
Gowda S; Quadras DD; Sesappa RS; Katapadi V; Kumar L; Kulkarni D; Mishra N
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Jun; 19(6):669-674. PubMed ID: 29959294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fracture behaviour of implant-implant- and implant-tooth-supported all-ceramic fixed dental prostheses utilising zirconium dioxide implant abutments.
Nothdurft FP; Merker S; Pospiech PR
Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Feb; 15(1):89-97. PubMed ID: 20049497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Marginal Vertical Discrepancies of Monolithic and Veneered Zirconia and Metal-Ceramic Three-Unit Posterior Fixed Dental Prostheses.
Lopez-Suarez C; Gonzalo E; Pelaez J; Serrano B; Suarez MJ
Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(3):256-8. PubMed ID: 27148985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Eleven-Year Follow-Up of a Prospective Study of Zirconia Implant Abutments Supporting Single All-Ceramic Crowns in Anterior and Premolar Regions.
Zembic A; Philipp AO; Hämmerle CH; Wohlwend A; Sailer I
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Oct; 17 Suppl 2():e417-26. PubMed ID: 25180473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Undetected residual cement on standard or individualized all-ceramic abutments with cemented zirconia single crowns - a prospective randomized pilot trial.
Kappel S; Eiffler C; Lorenzo-Bermejo J; Stober T; Rammelsberg P
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Sep; 27(9):1065-71. PubMed ID: 26381392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of retainer design on two-unit cantilever resin-bonded glass fiber reinforced composite fixed dental prostheses: an in vitro and finite element analysis study.
Keulemans F; De Jager N; Kleverlaan CJ; Feilzer AJ
J Adhes Dent; 2008 Oct; 10(5):355-64. PubMed ID: 19058681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Metal-free materials for fixed prosthodontic restorations.
Poggio CE; Ercoli C; Rispoli L; Maiorana C; Esposito M
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Dec; 12(12):CD009606. PubMed ID: 29261853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fiber-reinforced composite fixed dental prostheses with various pontics.
Perea L; Matinlinna JP; Tolvanen M; Lassila LV; Vallittu PK
J Adhes Dent; 2014 Apr; 16(2):161-8. PubMed ID: 24179988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Inlay-retained cantilever fixed dental prostheses to substitute a single premolar: impact of zirconia framework design after dynamic loading.
Shahin R; Tannous F; Kern M
Eur J Oral Sci; 2014 Aug; 122(4):310-6. PubMed ID: 24910293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
