These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35476611)
1. Examining the cross-cultural validity of the test of memory malingering and the Rey 15-item test. Crişan I; Erdodi L Appl Neuropsychol Adult; 2024; 31(5):721-731. PubMed ID: 35476611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimizing evaluation time while maintaining accuracy: Cross-validation of the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) Trial 1 and first 10-item errors as briefer performance validity tests. Kraemer LDR; Soble JR; Phillips JI; Webber TA; Fullen CT; Highsmith JM; Alverson WA; Critchfield EA Psychol Assess; 2020 May; 32(5):442-450. PubMed ID: 32027161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical utility of the Rey 15-Item Test, recognition trial, and error scores for detecting noncredible neuropsychological performance in a mixed clinical sample of veterans. Bailey KC; Soble JR; O'Rourke JJF Clin Neuropsychol; 2018 Jan; 32(1):119-131. PubMed ID: 28555516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validity assessment in Eastern Europe: cross-validation of the Dot Counting Test and MODEMM against the TOMM-1 and Rey-15 in a Romanian mixed clinical sample. Crișan I; Sava FA Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2023 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 37961918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. When 10 is enough: Errors on the first 10 items of the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMMe10) and administration time predict freestanding performance validity tests (PVTs) and underperformance on memory measures. Denning JH Appl Neuropsychol Adult; 2021; 28(1):35-47. PubMed ID: 30950290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is the Rey 15-Item Memory Test II (Rey II) a valid symptom validity test?: comparison with the TOMM. Whitney KA; Hook JN; Steiner AR; Shepard PH; Callaway S Appl Neuropsychol; 2008; 15(4):287-92. PubMed ID: 19023746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance on the Test of Memory Malingering is predicted by the number of errors on its first 10 items on an inpatient epilepsy monitoring unit. Grabyan JM; Collins RL; Alverson WA; Chen DK Clin Neuropsychol; 2018 Apr; 32(3):468-478. PubMed ID: 28826306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. TOMM Trial 1 as a performance validity indicator in a criminal forensic sample. Fazio RL; Denning JH; Denney RL Clin Neuropsychol; 2017 Jan; 31(1):251-267. PubMed ID: 27456971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The efficiency and accuracy of the Test of Memory Malingering trial 1, errors on the first 10 items of the test of memory malingering, and five embedded measures in predicting invalid test performance. Denning JH Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2012 Jun; 27(4):417-32. PubMed ID: 22543569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Not all performance validity tests are created equal: The role of recollection and familiarity in the Test of Memory Malingering and Word Memory Test. Eglit GM; Lynch JK; McCaffrey RJ J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2017 Mar; 39(2):173-189. PubMed ID: 27501116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Rey 15 item test plus recognition trial and TOMM in a community pediatric sample. Teague AM; Hirst RB Appl Neuropsychol Child; 2020; 9(4):329-336. PubMed ID: 31918597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Combining the test of memory malingering trial 1 with behavioral responses improves the detection of effort test failure. Denning JH Appl Neuropsychol Adult; 2014; 21(4):269-77. PubMed ID: 25265308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of performance of the test of memory malingering and word memory test in a criminal forensic sample. Fazio RL; Sanders JF; Denney RL Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2015 Jun; 30(4):293-301. PubMed ID: 25948293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of criterion measures on the classification accuracy of TOMM-1. Rai JK; Erdodi LA Appl Neuropsychol Adult; 2021; 28(2):185-196. PubMed ID: 31187632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the classification accuracy of multiple performance validity tests in a mixed clinical sample. Messerly J; Soble JR; Webber TA; Alverson WA; Fullen C; Kraemer LD; Marceaux JC Appl Neuropsychol Adult; 2021; 28(6):727-736. PubMed ID: 31835915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance and Symptom Validity Assessment in Patients with Apathy and Cognitive Impairment. Dandachi-FitzGerald B; Duits AA; Leentjens AFG; Verhey FRJ; Ponds RWHM J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2020 Mar; 26(3):314-321. PubMed ID: 31658930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An alternative approach to TOMM cutoff scores using a large sample of military personnel. Doddato FR; Forde J; Wang Y; Puente AE Appl Neuropsychol Adult; 2024; 31(6):1261-1269. PubMed ID: 36227693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Stratified performance on the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) is associated with differential responding on the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI). Whiteside DM; Hunt I; Choate A; Caraher K; Basso MR J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2020 Mar; 42(2):131-141. PubMed ID: 31771455 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of literacy and culture on cognitive effort test performance: An examination of the Test of Memory Malingering in Colombia. Nijdam-Jones A; Rivera D; Rosenfeld B; Arango-Lasprilla JC J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2019 Dec; 41(10):1015-1023. PubMed ID: 31322039 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Decision rules for an abbreviated administration of the Test of Memory Malingering. Ashendorf L; Withrow S; Ward SH; Sullivan SK; Sugarman MA Appl Neuropsychol Adult; 2024; 31(4):382-391. PubMed ID: 35068279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]