174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35476704)
1. Red and white blood cell morphology characterization and hands-on time analysis by the digital cell imaging analyzer DI-60.
Kweon OJ; Lim YK; Lee MK; Kim HR
PLoS One; 2022; 17(4):e0267638. PubMed ID: 35476704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance of automated digital cell imaging analyzer Sysmex DI-60.
Kim HN; Hur M; Kim H; Kim SW; Moon HW; Yun YM
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2017 Nov; 56(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 28672770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance evaluation of the digital cell imaging analyzer DI-60 integrated into the fully automated Sysmex XN hematology analyzer system.
Tabe Y; Yamamoto T; Maenou I; Nakai R; Idei M; Horii T; Miida T; Ohsaka A
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2015 Feb; 53(2):281-9. PubMed ID: 25153399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance comparison of two automated digital morphology analyzers for leukocyte differential in patients with malignant hematological diseases: Mindray MC-80 and Sysmex DI-60.
Ye X; Fang L; Chen Y; Tong J; Ning X; Feng L; Xu Y; Yang D
Int J Lab Hematol; 2024 Jun; 46(3):457-465. PubMed ID: 38212663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance Assessment of Sysmex DI-60: Is Digital Morphology Analyzer Reliable for White Blood Cell Differentials in Body Fluids?
Shin E; Hur M; Kim H; Lee GH; Hong MH; Nam M; Lee S
Diagnostics (Basel); 2024 Mar; 14(6):. PubMed ID: 38535013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Digital Morphology Analyzer Sysmex DI-60 vs. Manual Counting for White Blood Cell Differentials in Leukopenic Samples: A Comparative Assessment of Risk and Turnaround Time.
Nam M; Yoon S; Hur M; Lee GH; Kim H; Park M; Kim HN
Ann Lab Med; 2022 Jul; 42(4):398-405. PubMed ID: 35177560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance of digital morphology analyzer Vision Pro on white blood cell differentials.
Yoon S; Hur M; Park M; Kim H; Kim SW; Lee TH; Nam M; Moon HW; Yun YM
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2021 May; 59(6):1099-1106. PubMed ID: 33470955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. White blood cell differentials performance of a new automated digital cell morphology analyzer: Mindray MC-80.
Khongjaroensakun N; Chaothai N; Chamchomdao L; Suriyachand K; Paisooksantivatana K
Int J Lab Hematol; 2023 Oct; 45(5):691-699. PubMed ID: 37338111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance of the CellaVision DC-1 digital cell imaging analyser for differential counting and morphological classification of blood cells.
van der Vorm LN; Hendriks HA; Smits SM
J Clin Pathol; 2023 Mar; 76(3):194-201. PubMed ID: 34620610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Performance evaluation and validation of automated digital image analysis in peripheral blood cells morphology examination].
Wang R; Yang MY; Zhang JY; Su HQ; Duan J; Mi J; Wang ML
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2022 Jan; 102(4):261-266. PubMed ID: 35073674
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. How Reproducible Is the Data from Sysmex DI-60 in Leukopenic Samples?
Yoon S; Hur M; Lee GH; Nam M; Kim H
Diagnostics (Basel); 2021 Nov; 11(12):. PubMed ID: 34943409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the performance of two automatic cell morphology analyzers for peripheral-blood leukocyte morphology analysis: Mindray MC-100i and Sysmex DI-60.
Zhang S; He Y; Wu W; Tan H; Xie S; Liu M; Chen W; Sun D
Int J Lab Hematol; 2023 Dec; 45(6):860-868. PubMed ID: 37575073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Clinical application of automated digital image analysis for morphology review of peripheral blood leukocyte].
Xing Y; Yan X; Pu C; Shang K; Dong N; Wang R; Wang J
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Mar; 96(8):634-9. PubMed ID: 26932858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analytical performance of the digital morphology analyzer Sysmex DI-60 for body fluid cell differential counts.
Yoon S; Kim HR
PLoS One; 2023; 18(7):e0288551. PubMed ID: 37498851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Analytical validation of white blood cell differential and platelet assessment on the Sysmex DI-60 digital morphology analyzer.
Lapić I; Miloš M; Dorotić M; Drenški V; Coen Herak D; Rogić D
Int J Lab Hematol; 2023 Oct; 45(5):668-677. PubMed ID: 37255419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance evaluation of new Abbott Alinity hq hematology analyzer.
Woo KS; Jeong IH; An GD; Lim HH; Han JY
Int J Lab Hematol; 2019 Oct; 41(5):657-663. PubMed ID: 31271528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance of the digital cell morphology analyzer MC-100i in a multicenter study in tertiary hospitals in China.
Jiang H; Xu W; Chen W; He J; Jiang H; Mao Z; Liu M; Li M; Liu D; Pan Y; Qu C; Qu L; Sun Z; Sun D; Wang X; Wang J; Wu W; Xing Y; Zhang S; Zhang C; Zheng L; Guan M
Clin Chim Acta; 2024 Mar; 555():117801. PubMed ID: 38296220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Automated Cerebrospinal Fluid Cell Counts Using the New Body Fluid Mode of Sysmex UF-1000i.
Buoro S; Apassiti Esposito S; Alessio M; Crippa A; Ottomano C; Lippi G
J Clin Lab Anal; 2016 Sep; 30(5):381-91. PubMed ID: 26302990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance of the new MC-80 automated digital cell morphology analyser in detection of normal and abnormal blood cells: Comparison with the CellaVision DM9600.
Merino A; Laguna J; Rodríguez-García M; Julian J; Casanova A; Molina A
Int J Lab Hematol; 2024 Feb; 46(1):72-82. PubMed ID: 37746889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accurate white blood cell differential by Alinity hq: A comparison with flow cytometry and manual differential.
Gambell P; Rowley G; Pham TAT; Dang TL; Mulumba H; Smith L; Lakos G
Int J Lab Hematol; 2022 Apr; 44(2):288-295. PubMed ID: 34806835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
