These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35476863)
21. Retentive strength of implant-supported base metal copings over short metal abutments using different luting agents and surface treatments. Nejatidanesh F; Savabi O; Ebrahimi M; Savabi G Implant Dent; 2014 Apr; 23(2):162-7. PubMed ID: 24614878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effect of cleaning methods on retentive values of saliva-contaminated implant-supported zirconia copings. Nejatidanesh F; Savabi O; Savabi G; Razavi M Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 May; 29(5):530-536. PubMed ID: 29656421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Debonding Forces for Two-Piece Zirconia Abutments with Implant Platforms of Different Diameter and Use of Different Luting Strategies. Zenthöfer A; Rues S; Krisam J; Rustemeyer R; Rammelsberg P; Schmitter M Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(5):1041-1046. PubMed ID: 30231090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Retention Forces between Titanium and Zirconia Components of Two-Part Implant Abutments with Different Techniques of Surface Modification. von Maltzahn NF; Holstermann J; Kohorst P Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2016 Aug; 18(4):735-44. PubMed ID: 25916969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Pull-off Force of Four Different Implant Cements Between Zirconia Crowns and Titanium Implant Abutments in Two Different Abutment Heights. Volkmann H; Rauch A; Koenig A; Schierz O Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2022; 42(3):e67-e74. PubMed ID: 35472113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Factors determining the retentiveness of luting agents used with metal- and ceramic-based implant components. Schiessl C; Schaefer L; Winter C; Fuerst J; Rosentritt M; Zeman F; Behr M Clin Oral Investig; 2013 May; 17(4):1179-90. PubMed ID: 22847855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Retentiveness of various luting agents used with implant-supported prosthesis: an in vitro study. Garg P; Pujari M; Prithviraj DR; Khare S J Oral Implantol; 2014 Dec; 40(6):649-54. PubMed ID: 25506659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Retentive properties of five different luting cements on base and noble metal copings. Ergin S; Gemalmaz D J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Nov; 88(5):491-7. PubMed ID: 12473998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The Effect of Compressive Cyclic Loading on the Retention of Cast Single Crowns Cemented to Implant Abutments. Alvarez-Arenal A; Gonzalez-Gonzalez I; Pinés-Hueso J; deLlanos-Lanchares H; del Rio Highsmith J Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(1):80-2. PubMed ID: 26757336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Cement thickness at implant-supported single-tooth Lava assemblies: a scanning electron microscopic investigation. Apicella D; Veltri M; Chieffi N; Balleri P; Ferrari M Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Jul; 21(7):747-50. PubMed ID: 20636729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of Oxygen Plasma Treatment and Sandblasting of Titanium Implant-Abutment Surface on Bond Strength and Surface Topography. El-Helbawy NG; El-Hatery AA; Ahmed MH Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(3):555-62. PubMed ID: 27183064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Retention of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns with three types of cement. Palacios RP; Johnson GH; Phillips KM; Raigrodski AJ J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):104-14. PubMed ID: 16911887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Retention of zirconia ceramic copings bonded to titanium abutments. Ebert A; Hedderich J; Kern M Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):921-7. PubMed ID: 18271373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Fracture Strength of Monolithic All-Ceramic Crowns on Titanium Implant Abutments. Weyhrauch M; Igiel C; Scheller H; Weibrich G; Lehmann KM Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(2):304-9. PubMed ID: 27004277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The influence of different convergence angles and resin cements on the retention of zirconia copings. Ali AO; Kelly JR; Zandparsa R J Prosthodont; 2012 Dec; 21(8):614-21. PubMed ID: 22823334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Influence of abutment height and surface roughness on in vitro retention of three luting agents. Cano-Batalla J; Soliva-Garriga J; Campillo-Funollet M; Munoz-Viveros CA; Giner-Tarrida L Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 22299076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Retention of cast crown copings cemented to implant abutments. Dudley JE; Richards LC; Abbott JR Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):332-9. PubMed ID: 19133949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Use of luting agents with an implant system: Part I. Breeding LC; Dixon DL; Bogacki MT; Tietge JD J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Nov; 68(5):737-41. PubMed ID: 1432793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Retention of zirconia crowns to Ti-base abutments: effect of luting protocol, abutment treatment and autoclave sterilization. T P Bergamo E; Zahoui A; Luri Amorin Ikejiri L; Marun M; Peixoto da Silva K; G Coelho P; Soares S; A Bonfante E J Prosthodont Res; 2021 Jun; 65(2):171-175. PubMed ID: 32938879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The comparison of provisional luting agents and abutment surface roughness on the retention of provisional implant-supported crowns. Kim Y; Yamashita J; Shotwell JL; Chong KH; Wang HL J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):450-5. PubMed ID: 16765158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]