137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35477333)
1. Electrically evoked auditory cortical responses elicited from individually fitted stimulation parameters in cochlear implant users.
Callejón-Leblic MA; Barrios-Romero MM; Kontides A; Sánchez-Gómez S; Beynon AJ
Int J Audiol; 2023 Jul; 62(7):650-658. PubMed ID: 35477333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimizing stimulation parameters to record electrically evoked cortical auditory potentials in cochlear implant users.
Kranick M; Wagner L; Plontke S; Rahne T
Cochlear Implants Int; 2021 May; 22(3):121-127. PubMed ID: 33297872
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Cortical auditory evoked potentials in cochlear implant listeners via single electrode stimulation in relation to speech perception.
Liebscher T; Alberter K; Hoppe U
Int J Audiol; 2018 Dec; 57(12):933-940. PubMed ID: 30295156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Direct Elicitation of Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials by Electrical Stimulation and Their Use to Verify the Most Comfortable Level of Stimulation in Cochlear Implant Users.
Tavora-Vieira D; Ffoulkes E
Audiol Neurootol; 2023; 28(4):294-307. PubMed ID: 36958296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Neurophysiology of cochlear implant users I: effects of stimulus current level and electrode site on the electrical ABR, MLR, and N1-P2 response.
Firszt JB; Chambers RD; Kraus And N; Reeder RM
Ear Hear; 2002 Dec; 23(6):502-15. PubMed ID: 12476088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative Analysis of Cortical Auditory Evoked Potential in Cochlear Implant Users.
Távora-Vieira D; Mandruzzato G; Polak M; Truong B; Stutley A
Ear Hear; 2021 Nov-Dec 01; 42(6):1755-1769. PubMed ID: 34172688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Auditory cortical activity to different voice onset times in cochlear implant users.
Han JH; Zhang F; Kadis DS; Houston LM; Samy RN; Smith ML; Dimitrijevic A
Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Feb; 127(2):1603-1617. PubMed ID: 26616545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Acoustic Change Complex Compared to Hearing Performance in Unilaterally and Bilaterally Deaf Cochlear Implant Users.
van Heteren JAA; Vonck BMD; Stokroos RJ; Versnel H; Lammers MJW
Ear Hear; 2022 Nov-Dec 01; 43(6):1783-1799. PubMed ID: 35696186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Aging Effects on Cortical Responses to Tones and Speech in Adult Cochlear-Implant Users.
Xie Z; Stakhovskaya O; Goupell MJ; Anderson S
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2021 Dec; 22(6):719-740. PubMed ID: 34231111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relationship Between Peripheral and Psychophysical Measures of Amplitude Modulation Detection in Cochlear Implant Users.
Tejani VD; Abbas PJ; Brown CJ
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e268-e284. PubMed ID: 28207576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Effect of Aging on Auditory Nerve Function: Insights from Intraoperative eCAP Recordings in Cochlear Implant Users.
Mussoi BS; Woodson E; Sydlowski S
Otol Neurotol; 2023 Jun; 44(5):447-452. PubMed ID: 37026816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Effect of Advanced Age on the Electrode-Neuron Interface in Cochlear Implant Users.
Skidmore J; Carter BL; Riggs WJ; He S
Ear Hear; 2022 Jul-Aug 01; 43(4):1300-1315. PubMed ID: 34935648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Auditory cortical maturation in children with sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
Sparreboom M; Beynon AJ; Snik AF; Mylanus EA
Otol Neurotol; 2014 Jan; 35(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 24335930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Neurophysiology of cochlear implant users II: comparison among speech perception, dynamic range, and physiological measures.
Firszt JB; Chambers And RD; Kraus N
Ear Hear; 2002 Dec; 23(6):516-31. PubMed ID: 12476089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of changes in stimulus level on electrically evoked cortical auditory potentials.
Kim JR; Brown CJ; Abbas PJ; Etler CP; O'Brien S
Ear Hear; 2009 Jun; 30(3):320-9. PubMed ID: 19322089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The electrically evoked auditory change complex: preliminary results from nucleus cochlear implant users.
Brown CJ; Etler C; He S; O'Brien S; Erenberg S; Kim JR; Dhuldhoya AN; Abbas PJ
Ear Hear; 2008 Oct; 29(5):704-17. PubMed ID: 18596644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials Recorded Directly Through the Cochlear Implant in Cochlear Implant Recipients: a Feasibility Study.
Attias J; HabibAllah S; Aditya Tarigoppula VS; Glick H; Chen C; Kanthaiah K; Litvak L
Ear Hear; 2022 Sep-Oct 01; 43(5):1426-1436. PubMed ID: 35245922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Electrically evoked compound action potentials are different depending on the site of cochlear stimulation.
van de Heyning P; Arauz SL; Atlas M; Baumgartner WD; Caversaccio M; Chester-Browne R; Estienne P; Gavilan J; Godey B; Gstöttner W; Han D; Hagen R; Kompis M; Kuzovkov V; Lassaletta L; Lefevre F; Li Y; Müller J; Parnes L; Kleine Punte A; Raine C; Rajan G; Rivas A; Rivas JA; Royle N; Sprinzl G; Stephan K; Walkowiak A; Yanov Y; Zimmermann K; Zorowka P; Skarzynski H
Cochlear Implants Int; 2016 Nov; 17(6):251-262. PubMed ID: 27900916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Auditory steady-state responses in cochlear implant users: Effect of modulation frequency and stimulation artifacts.
Gransier R; Deprez H; Hofmann M; Moonen M; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
Hear Res; 2016 May; 335():149-160. PubMed ID: 26994660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials Recorded From Nucleus Hybrid Cochlear Implant Users.
Brown CJ; Jeon EK; Chiou LK; Kirby B; Karsten SA; Turner CW; Abbas PJ
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):723-32. PubMed ID: 26295607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
