These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35477333)

  • 1. Electrically evoked auditory cortical responses elicited from individually fitted stimulation parameters in cochlear implant users.
    Callejón-Leblic MA; Barrios-Romero MM; Kontides A; Sánchez-Gómez S; Beynon AJ
    Int J Audiol; 2023 Jul; 62(7):650-658. PubMed ID: 35477333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimizing stimulation parameters to record electrically evoked cortical auditory potentials in cochlear implant users.
    Kranick M; Wagner L; Plontke S; Rahne T
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2021 May; 22(3):121-127. PubMed ID: 33297872
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cortical auditory evoked potentials in cochlear implant listeners via single electrode stimulation in relation to speech perception.
    Liebscher T; Alberter K; Hoppe U
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Dec; 57(12):933-940. PubMed ID: 30295156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Direct Elicitation of Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials by Electrical Stimulation and Their Use to Verify the Most Comfortable Level of Stimulation in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Tavora-Vieira D; Ffoulkes E
    Audiol Neurootol; 2023; 28(4):294-307. PubMed ID: 36958296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Neurophysiology of cochlear implant users I: effects of stimulus current level and electrode site on the electrical ABR, MLR, and N1-P2 response.
    Firszt JB; Chambers RD; Kraus And N; Reeder RM
    Ear Hear; 2002 Dec; 23(6):502-15. PubMed ID: 12476088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative Analysis of Cortical Auditory Evoked Potential in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Távora-Vieira D; Mandruzzato G; Polak M; Truong B; Stutley A
    Ear Hear; 2021 Nov-Dec 01; 42(6):1755-1769. PubMed ID: 34172688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electrically evoked late latency response using single electrode stimulation and its relation to speech perception among paediatric cochlear implant users.
    Saravanan P; Devi N; Geetha C
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2024; 18():1441854. PubMed ID: 39345947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Auditory cortical activity to different voice onset times in cochlear implant users.
    Han JH; Zhang F; Kadis DS; Houston LM; Samy RN; Smith ML; Dimitrijevic A
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Feb; 127(2):1603-1617. PubMed ID: 26616545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Acoustic Change Complex Compared to Hearing Performance in Unilaterally and Bilaterally Deaf Cochlear Implant Users.
    van Heteren JAA; Vonck BMD; Stokroos RJ; Versnel H; Lammers MJW
    Ear Hear; 2022 Nov-Dec 01; 43(6):1783-1799. PubMed ID: 35696186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Aging Effects on Cortical Responses to Tones and Speech in Adult Cochlear-Implant Users.
    Xie Z; Stakhovskaya O; Goupell MJ; Anderson S
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2021 Dec; 22(6):719-740. PubMed ID: 34231111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relationship Between Peripheral and Psychophysical Measures of Amplitude Modulation Detection in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Tejani VD; Abbas PJ; Brown CJ
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e268-e284. PubMed ID: 28207576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Effect of Aging on Auditory Nerve Function: Insights from Intraoperative eCAP Recordings in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Mussoi BS; Woodson E; Sydlowski S
    Otol Neurotol; 2023 Jun; 44(5):447-452. PubMed ID: 37026816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Effect of Advanced Age on the Electrode-Neuron Interface in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Skidmore J; Carter BL; Riggs WJ; He S
    Ear Hear; 2022 Jul-Aug 01; 43(4):1300-1315. PubMed ID: 34935648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Auditory cortical maturation in children with sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Sparreboom M; Beynon AJ; Snik AF; Mylanus EA
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Jan; 35(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 24335930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neurophysiology of cochlear implant users II: comparison among speech perception, dynamic range, and physiological measures.
    Firszt JB; Chambers And RD; Kraus N
    Ear Hear; 2002 Dec; 23(6):516-31. PubMed ID: 12476089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of changes in stimulus level on electrically evoked cortical auditory potentials.
    Kim JR; Brown CJ; Abbas PJ; Etler CP; O'Brien S
    Ear Hear; 2009 Jun; 30(3):320-9. PubMed ID: 19322089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The electrically evoked auditory change complex: preliminary results from nucleus cochlear implant users.
    Brown CJ; Etler C; He S; O'Brien S; Erenberg S; Kim JR; Dhuldhoya AN; Abbas PJ
    Ear Hear; 2008 Oct; 29(5):704-17. PubMed ID: 18596644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials Recorded Directly Through the Cochlear Implant in Cochlear Implant Recipients: a Feasibility Study.
    Attias J; HabibAllah S; Aditya Tarigoppula VS; Glick H; Chen C; Kanthaiah K; Litvak L
    Ear Hear; 2022 Sep-Oct 01; 43(5):1426-1436. PubMed ID: 35245922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Electrically evoked compound action potentials are different depending on the site of cochlear stimulation.
    van de Heyning P; Arauz SL; Atlas M; Baumgartner WD; Caversaccio M; Chester-Browne R; Estienne P; Gavilan J; Godey B; Gstöttner W; Han D; Hagen R; Kompis M; Kuzovkov V; Lassaletta L; Lefevre F; Li Y; Müller J; Parnes L; Kleine Punte A; Raine C; Rajan G; Rivas A; Rivas JA; Royle N; Sprinzl G; Stephan K; Walkowiak A; Yanov Y; Zimmermann K; Zorowka P; Skarzynski H
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2016 Nov; 17(6):251-262. PubMed ID: 27900916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Auditory steady-state responses in cochlear implant users: Effect of modulation frequency and stimulation artifacts.
    Gransier R; Deprez H; Hofmann M; Moonen M; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
    Hear Res; 2016 May; 335():149-160. PubMed ID: 26994660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.