These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. First Experience of Robotic-assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Japan. Kagiyama K; Ueno T; Mitsutake Y; Yamaji K; Ishimatsu T; Sasaki KI; Fukumoto Y Intern Med; 2019 Dec; 58(23):3415-3419. PubMed ID: 31366804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Safety and Feasibility of a Novel, Second-Generation Robotic-Assisted System for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: First-in-Human Report. Smitson CC; Ang L; Pourdjabbar A; Reeves R; Patel M; Mahmud E J Invasive Cardiol; 2018 Apr; 30(4):152-156. PubMed ID: 29335386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of network performance on remote robotic-assisted endovascular interventions in porcine model. Legeza P; Britz GW; Shah A; Sconzert K; Sungur JM; Chinnadurai P; Sinha K; Lumsden AB J Robot Surg; 2022 Feb; 16(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 33550514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotically-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention: Reasons for partial manual assistance or manual conversion. Harrison J; Ang L; Naghi J; Behnamfar O; Pourdjabbar A; Patel MP; Reeves RR; Mahmud E Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2018 Jul; 19(5 Pt A):526-531. PubMed ID: 29221959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Transcarotid access for remote robotic endovascular neurointerventions: a cadaveric proof-of-concept study. Berczeli M; Chinnadurai P; Legeza PT; Britz GW; Lumsden AB Neurosurg Focus; 2022 Jan; 52(1):E18. PubMed ID: 34973671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]