These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35482887)
21. The roles, challenges and institutionalization of institutional review boards. Oyibo WA; Krugher M; Fagbenro-Beyioku AF Nig Q J Hosp Med; 2008; 18(2):115-9. PubMed ID: 19068565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Too Many Rationales, Not Enough Reason: A Call to Examine the Goals of Including Lay Members on Institutional Review Boards. Solomon S Account Res; 2016; 23(1):4-22. PubMed ID: 26528638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Navigating the Perfect Storm: Ethical Guidance for Conducting Research Involving Participants with Multiple Vulnerabilities. Childress AM; Thomas CR Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2018; 28(4):451-478. PubMed ID: 30713194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Big Data, Biomedical Research, and Ethics Review: New Challenges for IRBs. Ferretti A; Ienca M; Hurst S; Vayena E Ethics Hum Res; 2020 Sep; 42(5):17-28. PubMed ID: 32937036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Enhancing communication among data monitoring committees and institutional review boards. Taylor HA; Chaisson L; Sugarman J Clin Trials; 2008; 5(3):277-82. PubMed ID: 18559418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. "Protecting" or "Policing": Academic Researchers' View of IRBs in an Arab Context. Makhoul J; El-Alti L; Qutteina Y; Nasrallah C; Sakr C; Nakkash R; Alali K J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2014 Dec; 9(5):25-35. PubMed ID: 25747688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Institutional review boards in Saudi Arabia: the first survey-based report on their functions and operations. AlFattani A; AlBedah N; AlShahrani A; Alkawi A; AlMeharish A; Altwaijri Y; Omar A; AlKawi MZ; Khogeer A BMC Med Ethics; 2023 Jul; 24(1):50. PubMed ID: 37430255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Ethical and Practical Concerns about IRB Restrictions on the Use of Research Data. Barnes M; Carrithers J; Sugarman J Ethics Hum Res; 2020 Nov; 42(6):29-34. PubMed ID: 33136330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluation of Research Ethics Committees: Criteria for the Ethical Quality of the Review Process. Scherzinger G; Bobbert M Account Res; 2017; 24(3):152-176. PubMed ID: 28005408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Of Straws, Camels, Research Regulation, and IRBs. Friesen P; Redman B; Caplan A Ther Innov Regul Sci; 2019 Jul; 53(4):526-534. PubMed ID: 30176736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Perspectives of Singaporean biomedical researchers and research support staff on actual and ideal IRB review functions and characteristics: A quantitative analysis. Labude MK; Shen L; Zhu Y; Schaefer GO; Ong C; Xafis V PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0241783. PubMed ID: 33382683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Barriers to Effective Deliberation in Clinical Research Oversight. Wenner DM HEC Forum; 2016 Sep; 28(3):245-59. PubMed ID: 26613717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The protectors and the protected: what regulators and researchers can learn from IRB members and subjects. Cook AF; Hoas H; Joyner JC Narrat Inq Bioeth; 2013; 3(1):51-65. PubMed ID: 24407005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The Impact of Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) on Clinical Innovation: A Survey of Investigators and IRB Members. Stryjewski TP; Kalish BT; Silverman B; Lehmann LS J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2015 Dec; 10(5):481-7. PubMed ID: 26564945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Implications of the Revised Common Rule for Qualitative Health Research: Opportunities, Concerns, and Recommendations. Owczarzak J; Smith KC Qual Health Res; 2022 Jan; 32(2):385-393. PubMed ID: 34874221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]