237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35483640)
1. Advocation and advancements of EPR effect theory in drug delivery science: A commentary.
Hashida M
J Control Release; 2022 Jun; 346():355-357. PubMed ID: 35483640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Enhanced permeability and retention of macromolecular drugs in solid tumors: a royal gate for targeted anticancer nanomedicines.
Greish K
J Drug Target; 2007; 15(7-8):457-64. PubMed ID: 17671892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Clinical Translation of Organic Nanomaterials for Cancer Therapy: A Focus on Polymeric Nanoparticles, Micelles, Liposomes and Exosomes.
Palazzolo S; Bayda S; Hadla M; Caligiuri I; Corona G; Toffoli G; Rizzolio F
Curr Med Chem; 2018; 25(34):4224-4268. PubMed ID: 28875844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Paclitaxel-loaded micelles enhance transvascular permeability and retention of nanomedicines in tumors.
Danhier F; Danhier P; De Saedeleer CJ; Fruytier AC; Schleich N; des Rieux A; Sonveaux P; Gallez B; Préat V
Int J Pharm; 2015 Feb; 479(2):399-407. PubMed ID: 25578367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Polymeric drugs for efficient tumor-targeted drug delivery based on EPR-effect.
Maeda H; Bharate GY; Daruwalla J
Eur J Pharm Biopharm; 2009 Mar; 71(3):409-19. PubMed ID: 19070661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Advanced targeted therapies in cancer: Drug nanocarriers, the future of chemotherapy.
Pérez-Herrero E; Fernández-Medarde A
Eur J Pharm Biopharm; 2015 Jun; 93():52-79. PubMed ID: 25813885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Targeting endothelial permeability in the EPR effect.
Lahooti B; Akwii RG; Zahra FT; Sajib MS; Lamprou M; Alobaida A; Lionakis MS; Mattheolabakis G; Mikelis CM
J Control Release; 2023 Sep; 361():212-235. PubMed ID: 37517543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. To exploit the tumor microenvironment: Since the EPR effect fails in the clinic, what is the future of nanomedicine?
Danhier F
J Control Release; 2016 Dec; 244(Pt A):108-121. PubMed ID: 27871992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Strategies to improve the EPR effect: A mechanistic perspective and clinical translation.
Ikeda-Imafuku M; Wang LL; Rodrigues D; Shaha S; Zhao Z; Mitragotri S
J Control Release; 2022 May; 345():512-536. PubMed ID: 35337939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The EPR effect and beyond: Strategies to improve tumor targeting and cancer nanomedicine treatment efficacy.
Shi Y; van der Meel R; Chen X; Lammers T
Theranostics; 2020; 10(17):7921-7924. PubMed ID: 32685029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pharmacological and physical vessel modulation strategies to improve EPR-mediated drug targeting to tumors.
Ojha T; Pathak V; Shi Y; Hennink WE; Moonen CTW; Storm G; Kiessling F; Lammers T
Adv Drug Deliv Rev; 2017 Sep; 119():44-60. PubMed ID: 28697952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Nanomedicines based drug delivery systems for anti-cancer targeting and treatment.
Jain V; Jain S; Mahajan SC
Curr Drug Deliv; 2015; 12(2):177-91. PubMed ID: 25146439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The tumor EPR effect for cancer drug delivery: Current status, limitations, and alternatives.
Sun R; Xiang J; Zhou Q; Piao Y; Tang J; Shao S; Zhou Z; Bae YH; Shen Y
Adv Drug Deliv Rev; 2022 Dec; 191():114614. PubMed ID: 36347432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Toward a full understanding of the EPR effect in primary and metastatic tumors as well as issues related to its heterogeneity.
Maeda H
Adv Drug Deliv Rev; 2015 Aug; 91():3-6. PubMed ID: 25579058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reappraisal of anticancer nanomedicine design criteria in three types of preclinical cancer models for better clinical translation.
Luan X; Yuan H; Song Y; Hu H; Wen B; He M; Zhang H; Li Y; Li F; Shu P; Burnett JP; Truchan N; Palmisano M; Pai MP; Zhou S; Gao W; Sun D
Biomaterials; 2021 Aug; 275():120910. PubMed ID: 34144373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Strategies to enhance drug delivery to solid tumors by harnessing the EPR effects and alternative targeting mechanisms.
Zi Y; Yang K; He J; Wu Z; Liu J; Zhang W
Adv Drug Deliv Rev; 2022 Sep; 188():114449. PubMed ID: 35835353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Designing polymer conjugates as lysosomotropic nanomedicines.
Duncan R
Biochem Soc Trans; 2007 Feb; 35(Pt 1):56-60. PubMed ID: 17233601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Parameters Affecting the Enhanced Permeability and Retention Effect: The Need for Patient Selection.
Natfji AA; Ravishankar D; Osborn HMI; Greco F
J Pharm Sci; 2017 Nov; 106(11):3179-3187. PubMed ID: 28669714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Nanomedicines for Reactive Oxygen Species Mediated Approach: An Emerging Paradigm for Cancer Treatment.
Kwon S; Ko H; You DG; Kataoka K; Park JH
Acc Chem Res; 2019 Jul; 52(7):1771-1782. PubMed ID: 31241894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bridging Bio-Nano Science and Cancer Nanomedicine.
Björnmalm M; Thurecht KJ; Michael M; Scott AM; Caruso F
ACS Nano; 2017 Oct; 11(10):9594-9613. PubMed ID: 28926225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
