These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35484479)
1. Juror Decision Making and Euthanasia: Exploring the Role of Jury Nullification, Manner of Death, and Defendant-Decedent Relationship. Scott JD; Bell D; Barry B; Edlund JE Psychol Rep; 2023 Dec; 126(6):3052-3070. PubMed ID: 35484479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. When jurors' moral judgments result in jury nullification: moral outrage at the law as a mediator of euthanasia attitudes on verdicts. Peter-Hagene LC; Ratliff CL Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2021; 28(1):27-49. PubMed ID: 34552378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Gender, Generations, and Guilt: Defendant Gender and Age Affect Jurors' Decisions and Perceptions in an Intimate Partner Homicide Trial. Ruva CL; Smith KD; Sykes EC J Interpers Violence; 2023 Dec; 38(23-24):12089-12112. PubMed ID: 37602736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Chaos in the courtroom reconsidered: emotional bias and juror nullification. Horowitz IA; Kerr NL; Park ES; Gockel C Law Hum Behav; 2006 Apr; 30(2):163-81. PubMed ID: 16786405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of developmental language disorder in a defendant's description on mock jurors' perceptions and judgements. Hobson HM; Woodley J; Gamblen S; Brackely J; O'Neill F; Miles D; Westwood C Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2023 Jan; 58(1):189-205. PubMed ID: 36087284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Jurors use mental state information to assess breach in negligence cases. Margoni F; Brown TR Cognition; 2023 Jul; 236():105442. PubMed ID: 36996604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. From the shadows into the light: How pretrial publicity and deliberation affect mock jurors' decisions, impressions, and memory. Ruva CL; Guenther CC Law Hum Behav; 2015 Jun; 39(3):294-310. PubMed ID: 25495716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An attribution theory-based content analysis of mock jurors' deliberations regarding coerced confessions. Stevenson MC; McCracken E; Watson A; Petty T; Plogher T Law Hum Behav; 2023 Apr; 47(2):348-366. PubMed ID: 37053386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Abuse Is Abuse: The Influence of Type of Abuse, Victim Age, and Defendant Age on Juror Decision Making. Sheahan CL; Pica E; Pozzulo JD J Interpers Violence; 2021 Jan; 36(1-2):938-956. PubMed ID: 29294918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Keep your bias to yourself: How deliberating with differently biased others affects mock-jurors' guilt decisions, perceptions of the defendant, memories, and evidence interpretation. Ruva CL; Guenther CC Law Hum Behav; 2017 Oct; 41(5):478-493. PubMed ID: 28714733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of race on jurors' perceptions of lethal police use of force. Ewanation L; Maeder EM Law Hum Behav; 2023 Feb; 47(1):53-67. PubMed ID: 36931849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Juror decision-making in cases of rape involving high functioning Autistic persons. Devine K; Mojtahedi D Int J Law Psychiatry; 2021; 77():101714. PubMed ID: 34062383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How type of excuse defense, mock juror age, and defendant age affect mock jurors' decisions. Higgins PL; Heath WP; Grannemann BD J Soc Psychol; 2007 Aug; 147(4):371-92. PubMed ID: 17955749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The influence of sex on mock jurors' verdicts across type of child abuse cases. Pettalia J; Pozzulo JD; Reed J Child Abuse Negl; 2017 Jul; 69():1-9. PubMed ID: 28415027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Failure of All Mothers or the Mother of All Failures? Juror Perceptions of Failure to Protect Laws. Stanziani M; Cox J J Interpers Violence; 2021 Jan; 36(1-2):NP690-NP711. PubMed ID: 29294952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Juror Decision-Making in a Child Trafficking Case: The Impact of Defendant and Victim Gender, Defendant Age, and Defendant Status. Pica E; Hildenbrand A; Fraser L; Pozzulo J J Interpers Violence; 2023 Sep; 38(17-18):10031-10054. PubMed ID: 37096978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mosaic or Melting Pot? Race and Juror Decision Making in Canada and the United States. Maeder EM; McManus LA J Interpers Violence; 2022 Jan; 37(1-2):NP991-NP1012. PubMed ID: 32401133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mock-Jurors' Judgements in a Sexual Assault Case: The Influence of Defendant Race and Occupational Status, Delayed Reporting, and Multiple Allegations. Fraser BM; Pica E; Pozzulo JD J Interpers Violence; 2023 Jul; 38(13-14):7964-7989. PubMed ID: 36762531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. "But He's a Star Football Player!": How Social Status Influences Mock Jurors' Perceptions in a Sexual Assault Case. Pica E; Sheahan C; Pozzulo J J Interpers Violence; 2020 Oct; 35(19-20):3963-3985. PubMed ID: 29294785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The impact of pretrial publicity on mock juror and jury verdicts: A meta-analysis. Hoetger LA; Devine DJ; Brank EM; Drew RM; Rees R Law Hum Behav; 2022 Apr; 46(2):121-139. PubMed ID: 35084906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]