214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35484780)
1. A systematic review on disease-drug-drug interactions with immunomodulating drugs: A critical appraisal of risk assessment and drug labelling.
de Jong LM; Klomp SD; Treijtel N; Rissmann R; Swen JJ; Manson ML
Br J Clin Pharmacol; 2022 Oct; 88(10):4387-4402. PubMed ID: 35484780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Approval of Cancer Drugs With Uncertain Therapeutic Value: A Comparison of Regulatory Decisions in Europe and the United States.
Salcher-Konrad M; Naci H; Davis C
Milbank Q; 2020 Dec; 98(4):1219-1256. PubMed ID: 33021339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Review of Patient-Reported Outcomes Labeling for Oncology Drugs Approved by the FDA and the EMA (2012-2016).
Gnanasakthy A; Barrett A; Evans E; D'Alessio D; Romano CD
Value Health; 2019 Feb; 22(2):203-209. PubMed ID: 30711065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A fresh perspective on comparing the FDA and the CHMP/EMA: approval of antineoplastic tyrosine kinase inhibitors.
Shah RR; Roberts SA; Shah DR
Br J Clin Pharmacol; 2013 Sep; 76(3):396-411. PubMed ID: 23362829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Elements of Regulatory Dissonance: Examining FDA and EMA Product Labeling of New Vaccines (2006-2018).
Seo Y; Pacifici E
Vaccine; 2020 Nov; 38(47):7485-7489. PubMed ID: 33059971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Food and Drug Administration reports provided more data but were more difficult to use than the European Medicines Agency reports.
Schroll JB; Abdel-Sattar M; Bero L
J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Jan; 68(1):102-7. PubMed ID: 25150193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of PRO label claims granted by the FDA as compared to the EMA (2006-2010).
DeMuro C; Clark M; Doward L; Evans E; Mordin M; Gnanasakthy A
Value Health; 2013 Dec; 16(8):1150-5. PubMed ID: 24326168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Priority review drugs approved by the FDA and the EMA: time for international regulatory harmonization of pharmaceuticals?
Alqahtani S; Seoane-Vazquez E; Rodriguez-Monguio R; Eguale T
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2015 Jul; 24(7):709-15. PubMed ID: 26013294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The New Drug Lag: EU Lags in Review Times of Monoclonal Antibodies.
Sharma V; Deore VD; Deore SV; Martin IG
Ther Innov Regul Sci; 2020 Jul; 54(4):770-774. PubMed ID: 32557295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Not your usual drug-drug interactions: Monoclonal antibody-based therapeutics may interact with antiseizure medications.
Berman E; Noyman I; Medvedovsky M; Ekstein D; Eyal S
Epilepsia; 2022 Feb; 63(2):271-289. PubMed ID: 34967010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Comparison of FDA and EMA Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling.
Kappel D; Sahin L; Yao L; Thor S; Kweder S
Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2023 Jun; 113(6):1251-1257. PubMed ID: 36645246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of new drugs approved by the FDA, the EMA, and Swissmedic: an assessment of the international harmonization of drugs.
Zeukeng MJ; Seoane-Vazquez E; Bonnabry P
Eur J Clin Pharmacol; 2018 Jun; 74(6):811-818. PubMed ID: 29470610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. 2020 FDA Drug-drug Interaction Guidance: A Comparison Analysis and Action Plan by Pharmaceutical Industrial Scientists.
Sudsakorn S; Bahadduri P; Fretland J; Lu C
Curr Drug Metab; 2020; 21(6):403-426. PubMed ID: 32562522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. To what degree are review outcomes aligned for new active substances (NASs) between the European Medicines Agency and the US Food and Drug Administration? A comparison based on publicly available information for NASs initially approved in the time period 2014 to 2016.
Kühler TC; Bujar M; McAuslane N; Liberti L
BMJ Open; 2019 Nov; 9(11):e028677. PubMed ID: 31772082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Food and Drug Administration vs European Medicines Agency: Review times and clinical evidence on novel drugs at the time of approval.
Joppi R; Bertele V; Vannini T; Garattini S; Banzi R
Br J Clin Pharmacol; 2020 Jan; 86(1):170-174. PubMed ID: 31657044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Do the EMA accelerated assessment procedure and the FDA priority review ensure a therapeutic added value? 2006-2015: a cohort study.
Boucaud-Maitre D; Altman JJ
Eur J Clin Pharmacol; 2016 Oct; 72(10):1275-1281. PubMed ID: 27473682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Kinase Inhibitors FDA Approved 2018-2023: Drug Targets, Metabolic Pathways, and Drug-Induced Toxicities.
Latham BD; Geffert RM; Jackson KD
Drug Metab Dispos; 2024 May; 52(6):479-492. PubMed ID: 38286637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of Coverage in England of Cancer Drugs Qualifying for US Food and Drug Administration Accelerated Approval.
Cherla A; Naci H; Kesselheim AS; Gyawali B; Mossialos E
JAMA Intern Med; 2021 Apr; 181(4):490-498. PubMed ID: 33616607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. FDA- and EMA-Approved Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Advanced
Solassol I; Pinguet F; Quantin X
Biomolecules; 2019 Oct; 9(11):. PubMed ID: 31671561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative evaluation of cardiovascular risks among nine FDA-approved VEGFR-TKIs in patients with solid tumors: a Bayesian network analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Hou W; Ding M; Li X; Zhou X; Zhu Q; Varela-Ramirez A; Yi C
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2021 Aug; 147(8):2407-2420. PubMed ID: 33725154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
