These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3548593)

  • 1. Comparison of two biological aerosol sampling methods.
    Zimmerman NJ; Reist PC; Turner AG
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1987 Jan; 53(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 3548593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Precision of the all-glass impinger and the andersen microbial impactor for air sampling in solid-waste handling facilities.
    Lembke LL; Kniseley RN; van Nostrand RC; Hale MD
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1981 Aug; 42(2):222-5. PubMed ID: 7025757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of Air Samplers for Recovery of Artificially Generated Aerosols of Pure Cultures in a Controlled Environment.
    Kang YJ; Frank JF
    J Food Prot; 1989 Aug; 52(8):560-563. PubMed ID: 31003329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the commercial bacterial air samplers by the new bacterial aerosol generator.
    Furuhashi M; Miyamae T
    Bull Tokyo Med Dent Univ; 1981 Mar; 28(1):7-21. PubMed ID: 7011587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Andersen eight-stage and two-stage viable air samplers.
    Curtis SE; Balsbaugh RK; Drummond JG
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1978 Jan; 35(1):208-9. PubMed ID: 341808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of Air Samplers for Recovery of Biological Aerosols in Dairy Processing Plants.
    Kang YJ; Frank JF
    J Food Prot; 1989 Sep; 52(9):655-659. PubMed ID: 31003282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of a simple device for bacteriological sampling of respirator-generated aerosols.
    Ryan KJ; Mihalyi SF
    J Clin Microbiol; 1977 Feb; 5(2):178-83. PubMed ID: 403199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of eight bioaerosol samplers challenged with aerosols of free bacteria.
    Jensen PA; Todd WF; Davis GN; Scarpino PV
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1992 Oct; 53(10):660-7. PubMed ID: 1456208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of methods for quantitative determinations of airborne bacteria and evaluation of total viable counts.
    Lundholm IM
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1982 Jul; 44(1):179-83. PubMed ID: 6751223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of four sampling devices for Burkholderia pseudomallei laboratory aerosol studies.
    Schuit M; Gardner S; Taylor J; Dabisch P
    PLoS Negl Trop Dis; 2021 Feb; 15(2):e0009001. PubMed ID: 33524051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of portable air samplers for monitoring airborne culturable bacteria.
    Mehta SK; Bell-Robinson DM; Groves TO; Stetzenbach LD; Pierson DL
    AIHAJ; 2000; 61(6):850-4. PubMed ID: 11192219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of three portable samplers for monitoring airborne fungi.
    Mehta SK; Mishra SK; Pierson DL
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1996 May; 62(5):1835-8. PubMed ID: 11536729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Enumeration of viable fungi in occupational environments: a comparison of samplers and media.
    Smid T; Schokkin E; Boleij JS; Heederik D
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1989 May; 50(5):235-9. PubMed ID: 2729098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Airborne virus sampling: Efficiencies of samplers and their detection limits for infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV).
    Zhao Y; Aarnink AJ; Wang W; Fabri T; Groot Koerkamp PW; de Jong MC
    Ann Agric Environ Med; 2014; 21(3):464-71. PubMed ID: 25292111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A field comparison of four fungal aerosol sampling instruments: inter-sampler calibrations and caveats.
    Lee KS; Teschke K; Brauer M; Bartlett KH
    Indoor Air; 2004 Oct; 14(5):367-72. PubMed ID: 15330797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the Andersen viable impactor for single stage sampling.
    Jones W; Morring K; Morey P; Sorenson W
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1985 May; 46(5):294-8. PubMed ID: 4003283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Investigation and application of methods for enumerating heterotrophs and Escherichia coli in the air within piggery sheds.
    Chinivasagam HN; Blackall PJ
    J Appl Microbiol; 2005; 98(5):1137-45. PubMed ID: 15836483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The assessment of aerosol concentration by means of the Andersen sampler.
    Peto S; Powell EO
    J Appl Bacteriol; 1970 Sep; 33(3):582-98. PubMed ID: 4923566
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development of a size-selective sampler combined with an adenosine triphosphate bioluminescence assay for the rapid measurement of bioaerosols.
    Liao L; Byeon JH; Park JH
    Environ Res; 2021 Mar; 194():110615. PubMed ID: 33309960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of high-volume air sampling equipment for viral aerosol sampling during emergency response.
    Cooper C; Slagley J; Lohaus J; Escamilla E; Bliss C; Semler D; Felker D; Smith D; Ott D
    J Emerg Manag; 2014; 12(2):161-70. PubMed ID: 24828912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.