These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35486130)

  • 1. The First Evaluation of Remote Magnetic Navigation-Guided Pediatric Ventricular Arrhythmia Ablation.
    Noten AME; Ramdat Misier NL; Kammeraad JAE; Wijchers S; Van Beynum IM; Dalinghaus M; Krasemann TB; Yap SC; de Groot NMS; Szili-Torok T
    Pediatr Cardiol; 2022 Dec; 43(8):1695-1703. PubMed ID: 35486130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Remote magnetic navigation shows superior long-term outcomes in pediatric atrioventricular (nodal) tachycardia ablation compared to manual radiofrequency and cryoablation.
    Noten AME; Kammeraad JAE; Ramdat Misier NL; Wijchers S; van Beynum IM; Dalinghaus M; Krasemann TB; Yap SC; de Groot NMS; Szili-Torok T
    Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc; 2021 Dec; 37():100881. PubMed ID: 34646933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical research: remote magnetic navigation vs. manually controlled catheter ablation of right ventricular outflow tract arrhythmias: a retrospective study.
    Shauer A; De Vries LJ; Akca F; Palazzolo J; Shurrab M; Lashevsky I; Tiong I; Singh SM; Newman D; Szili-Torok T; Crystal E
    Europace; 2018 May; 20(suppl_2):ii28-ii32. PubMed ID: 29722855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of robotic magnetic navigation-guided and manual catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias arising from the papillary muscles.
    Bassil G; Liu CF; Markowitz SM; Thomas G; Ip JE; Macatangay C; Maglione T; Saleh L; Lerman BB; Cheung JW
    Europace; 2018 May; 20(suppl_2):ii5-ii10. PubMed ID: 29722854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Early and long-term outcomes after manual and remote magnetic navigation-guided catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia.
    Qian P; De Silva K; Kumar S; Nadri F; Samanta R; Bhaskaran A; Ross D; Sivagangabalan G; Cooper M; Kizana E; Davis L; Denniss AR; Thiagalingam A; Thomas S; Kovoor P
    Europace; 2018 May; 20(suppl_2):ii11-ii21. PubMed ID: 29722861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Outcomes of manual versus remote magnetic navigation for catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia: a systematic review and updated meta-analysis.
    Blandino A; Bianchi F; Sibona Masi A; Mazzanti A; D'Ascenzo F; Grossi S; Musumeci G
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2021 Jun; 44(6):1102-1114. PubMed ID: 33825206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A meta-analysis of manual versus remote magnetic navigation for ventricular tachycardia ablation.
    Turagam MK; Atkins D; Tung R; Mansour M; Ruskin J; Cheng J; Di Biase L; Natale A; Lakkireddy D
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2017 Sep; 49(3):227-235. PubMed ID: 28624892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of remote magnetic navigation ablation and manual ablation of idiopathic ventricular arrhythmia after failed manual ablation.
    Kawamura M; Scheinman MM; Tseng ZH; Lee BK; Marcus GM; Badhwar N
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2017 Jan; 48(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 27314679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long-term efficacy of single procedure remote magnetic catheter navigation for ablation of ischemic ventricular tachycardia: a retrospective study.
    Dinov B; Schönbauer R; Wojdyla-Hordynska A; Braunschweig F; Richter S; Altmann D; Sommer P; Gaspar T; Bollmann A; Wetzel U; Rolf S; Piorkowski C; Hindricks G; Arya A
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2012 May; 23(5):499-505. PubMed ID: 22313170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Remote magnetic navigation compared to contemporary manual techniques for the catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias in structural heart disease.
    Bennett RG; Campbell T; Sood A; Bhaskaran A; De Silva K; Davis L; Qian P; Sivagangabalan G; Cooper MJ; Chow CK; Thiagalingam A; Denniss AR; Thomas SP; Kizana E; Kumar S
    Heliyon; 2021 Dec; 7(12):e08538. PubMed ID: 34917813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Contact feedback improves 1-year outcomes of remote magnetic navigation-guided ischemic ventricular tachycardia ablation.
    Noten AME; Hendriks AA; Yap SC; Mol D; Bhagwandien R; Wijchers S; Kardys I; Khan M; Szili-Torok T
    Int J Cardiol; 2020 Sep; 315():36-44. PubMed ID: 32413467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multicenter, randomized comparison between magnetically navigated and manually guided radiofrequency ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (the MagMa-AVNRT-trial).
    Reents T; Jilek C; Schuster P; Nölker G; Koch-Büttner K; Ammar-Busch S; Semmler V; Bourier F; Kottmaier M; Kornmayer M; Brooks S; Fichtner S; Kolb C; Deisenhofer I; Hessling G
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2017 Dec; 106(12):947-952. PubMed ID: 28849269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Procedural outcomes and learning curve of cardiac arrhythmias catheter ablation using remote magnetic navigation: Experience from a large-scale single-center study.
    Li X; Jin Q; Zhang N; Ling T; Lin C; Jia K; Bao Y; Xie Y; Wei Y; Chen K; Pan W; Xie Y; Wu L
    Clin Cardiol; 2020 Sep; 43(9):968-975. PubMed ID: 32453461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Remote magnetic catheter navigation for cavotricuspid isthmus ablation in patients with common-type atrial flutter.
    Vollmann D; Lüthje L; Seegers J; Hasenfuss G; Zabel M
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2009 Dec; 2(6):603-10. PubMed ID: 20009074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contact force sensing manual catheter versus remote magnetic navigation ablation of atrial fibrillation: a single-center comparison.
    Schlögl S; Schlögl KS; Bengel P; Haarmann H; Bergau L; Rasenack E; Hasenfuss G; Zabel M
    Heart Vessels; 2024 May; 39(5):427-437. PubMed ID: 38189924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Endo-epicardial ablation of ventricular arrhythmias in the left ventricle with the Remote Magnetic Navigation System and the 3.5-mm open irrigated magnetic catheter: results from a large single-center case-control series.
    Di Biase L; Santangeli P; Astudillo V; Conti S; Mohanty P; Mohanty S; Sanchez JE; Horton R; Thomas B; Burkhardt JD; Natale A
    Heart Rhythm; 2010 Aug; 7(8):1029-35. PubMed ID: 20434589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Remote magnetic versus manual catheter navigation for circumferential pulmonary vein ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation.
    Lüthje L; Vollmann D; Seegers J; Dorenkamp M; Sohns C; Hasenfuss G; Zabel M
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2011 Nov; 100(11):1003-11. PubMed ID: 21706198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Remote magnetic navigation versus manual catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: A single center long-term comparison.
    Schlögl S; Schlögl KS; Haarmann H; Bengel P; Bergau L; Rasenack E; Hasenfuss G; Zabel M
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2022 Jan; 45(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 34687054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Comparison of Remote Magnetic Irrigated Tip Ablation versus Manual Catheter Irrigated Tip Catheter Ablation With and Without Force Sensing Feedback.
    Weiss JP; May HT; Bair TL; Crandall BG; Cutler MJ; Day JD; Osborn JS; Mallender C; Bunch TJ
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2016 Mar; 27 Suppl 1():S5-S10. PubMed ID: 26969224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Catheter Ablation of Focal Atrial Tachycardia Using Remote Magnetic Navigation.
    Liu XY; Jacobsen PK; Pehrson S; Chen X
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2018 Apr; 30(4):126-132. PubMed ID: 29245153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.