These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35486511)

  • 1. Effect of Aging on Surface Roughness and Color Stability of a Novel Alkasite in Comparison with Current Direct Restorative Materials.
    Yazkan B; Celik EU; Recen D
    Oper Dent; 2021 Sep; 46(5):E240-E250. PubMed ID: 35486511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Color stability and surface roughness of ormocer- versus methacrylate-based single shade composite in anterior restoration.
    Ebaya MM; Ali AI; El-Haliem HA; Mahmoud SH
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Sep; 22(1):430. PubMed ID: 36167560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of at-home whitening strips on the surface roughness and color of a composite and an ormocer restorative material.
    Gurbuz A; Ozkan P; Yilmaz K; Yilmaz B; Durkan R
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Jan; 22(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 22985354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid composite resin and ormocer-based tooth-colored restorative materials after several finishing and polishing procedures.
    Başeren M
    J Biomater Appl; 2004 Oct; 19(2):121-34. PubMed ID: 15381785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Susceptibility of restorative materials to staining by common beverages: an in vitro study.
    Ayad NM
    Eur J Esthet Dent; 2007; 2(2):236-47. PubMed ID: 19655568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spectrophotometric Analysis of Different Flowable Restorative Materials.
    ElEmbaby AE; Slais M; Alawami A; Alabbad M; Alsowyan M; Hanna N; Bahgat H
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Feb; 22(2):111-116. PubMed ID: 34257167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vitro surface and color changes of tooth-colored restorative materials after sport and energy drink cyclic immersions.
    Tanthanuch S; Kukiattrakoon B; Thongsroi T; Saesaw P; Pongpaiboon N; Saewong S
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Dec; 22(1):578. PubMed ID: 36494665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Susceptibility to discoloration of dental restorative materials containing dimethacrylate resin after bleaching.
    Yılmaz MN; Gul P
    Odontology; 2023 Apr; 111(2):376-386. PubMed ID: 36109438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of thermal and acid challenges on the surface properties of pink restorative materials.
    Araújo EM; Silva BT; Siriani LK; Lago AD; Simionato MRL; Matos AB
    Am J Dent; 2019 Aug; 32(4):159-164. PubMed ID: 31436934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of three bleaching agents on the surface properties of three different esthetic restorative materials.
    Turker SB; Biskin T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 May; 89(5):466-73. PubMed ID: 12806324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative Evaluation of Surface Roughness and Wettability of an Alkasite with Nano Bulk-Fill and Nanofilled Resin Composite Restorative Materials:
    Shekhar S; Suprabha BS; Shenoy R; Natarajan S; Rao A
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2022; 13(4):337-343. PubMed ID: 36687002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fracture and viscoelastic behavior of novel self-adhesive materials for simplified restoration concepts.
    Ilie N
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2022 Jan; 125():104970. PubMed ID: 34798533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of surface characteristic of different restorative materials containing glass ionomer on
    Kelten OS; Hepdeniz OK; Tuncer Y; Kankaya DA; Gurdal O
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2020 Jul; 23(7):957-964. PubMed ID: 32620725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Translucency of esthetic dental restorative CAD/CAM materials and composite resins with respect to thickness and surface roughness.
    Awad D; Stawarczyk B; Liebermann A; Ilie N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jun; 113(6):534-40. PubMed ID: 25749093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of sealant agents on the color stability and surface roughness of nanohybrid composite resins.
    Dede DÖ; Şahin O; Koroglu A; Yilmaz B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Jul; 116(1):119-28. PubMed ID: 26922208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the response of esthetic restorative materials to ultraviolet aging.
    Choi YS; Kang KH; Att W
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Nov; 126(5):679-685. PubMed ID: 33041076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of polishing systems on stain susceptibility and surface roughness of nanocomposite resin material.
    Barakah HM; Taher NM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):625-31. PubMed ID: 24721503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Color stability, roughness, and water sorption/solubility of glass ionomer-Based restorative materials.
    Savas S; Colgecen O; Yasa B; Kucukyilmaz E
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2019 Jun; 22(6):824-832. PubMed ID: 31187769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cytotoxic effects to mouse and human gingival fibroblasts of a nanohybrid ormocer versus dimethacrylate-based composites.
    Schubert A; Ziegler C; Bernhard A; Bürgers R; Miosge N
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Jan; 23(1):133-139. PubMed ID: 29603022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative evaluation of mechanical and physical properties of a new bulk-fill alkasite with conventional restorative materials.
    Naz F; Samad Khan A; Kader MA; Al Gelban LOS; Mousa NMA; Asiri RSH; Hakeem AS
    Saudi Dent J; 2021 Nov; 33(7):666-673. PubMed ID: 34803317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.