These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35486962)
1. Association between one-to-one midwifery care in the active phase of labour and use of pain relief and birth outcomes: A cohort of nulliparous women. Buerengen T; Bernitz S; Øian P; Dalbye R Midwifery; 2022 Jul; 110():103341. PubMed ID: 35486962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of timing of admission in labour and management of labour on method of birth: results from a randomised controlled trial of caseload midwifery (COSMOS trial). Davey MA; McLachlan HL; Forster D; Flood M Midwifery; 2013 Dec; 29(12):1297-302. PubMed ID: 23890679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Upright versus lying down position in second stage of labour in nulliparous women with low dose epidural: BUMPES randomised controlled trial. Epidural and Position Trial Collaborative Group BMJ; 2017 Oct; 359():j4471. PubMed ID: 29046273 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Perinatal and maternal outcomes by planned place of birth for healthy women with low risk pregnancies: the Birthplace in England national prospective cohort study. ; Brocklehurst P; Hardy P; Hollowell J; Linsell L; Macfarlane A; McCourt C; Marlow N; Miller A; Newburn M; Petrou S; Puddicombe D; Redshaw M; Rowe R; Sandall J; Silverton L; Stewart M BMJ; 2011 Nov; 343():d7400. PubMed ID: 22117057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Systematic review and meta-analysis to examine intrapartum interventions, and maternal and neonatal outcomes following immersion in water during labour and waterbirth. Burns E; Feeley C; Hall PJ; Vanderlaan J BMJ Open; 2022 Jul; 12(7):e056517. PubMed ID: 35790327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Labour outcomes in caseload midwifery and standard care: a register-based cohort study. Jepsen I; Juul S; Foureur MJ; Sørensen EE; Nohr EA BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 Dec; 18(1):481. PubMed ID: 30522453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Change in primary midwife-led care in the Netherlands in 2000–2008: A descriptive study of caesarean sections and other interventions among 807,437 low-risk births. Offerhaus PM; de Jonge A; van der Pal-de-Bruin KM; Hukkelhoven CW; Scheepers PL; Lagro-Janssen AL Midwifery; 2015 Jun; 31(6):648-54. PubMed ID: 26203475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The frequency of intrapartum caesarean section use with the WHO partograph versus Zhang's guideline in the Labour Progression Study (LaPS): a multicentre, cluster-randomised controlled trial. Bernitz S; Dalbye R; Zhang J; Eggebø TM; Frøslie KF; Olsen IC; Blix E; Øian P Lancet; 2019 Jan; 393(10169):340-348. PubMed ID: 30581039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Acupuncture or acupressure for induction of labour. Smith CA; Armour M; Dahlen HG Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Oct; 10(10):CD002962. PubMed ID: 29036756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Labour duration and timing of interventions in women planning vaginal birth after caesarean section. Grylka-Baeschlin S; Petersen A; Karch A; Gross MM Midwifery; 2016 Mar; 34():221-229. PubMed ID: 26681573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Subcutaneous administration of fentanyl in childbirth: an observational study on the clinical effectiveness of fentanyl for mother and neonate. Fleet J; Jones M; Belan I Midwifery; 2014 Jan; 30(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 23523191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia in labour. Anim-Somuah M; Smyth RM; Jones L Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2011 Dec; (12):CD000331. PubMed ID: 22161362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluating Midwifery Units (EMU): a prospective cohort study of freestanding midwifery units in New South Wales, Australia. Monk A; Tracy M; Foureur M; Grigg C; Tracy S BMJ Open; 2014 Oct; 4(10):e006252. PubMed ID: 25361840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hypnosis for pain management during labour and childbirth. Madden K; Middleton P; Cyna AM; Matthewson M; Jones L Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 May; 2016(5):CD009356. PubMed ID: 27192949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of continuity of care by a primary midwife (caseload midwifery) on caesarean section rates in women of low obstetric risk: the COSMOS randomised controlled trial. McLachlan HL; Forster DA; Davey MA; Farrell T; Gold L; Biro MA; Albers L; Flood M; Oats J; Waldenström U BJOG; 2012 Nov; 119(12):1483-92. PubMed ID: 22830446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluating Maternity Units: a prospective cohort study of freestanding midwife-led primary maternity units in New Zealand-clinical outcomes. Grigg CP; Tracy SK; Tracy M; Daellenbach R; Kensington M; Monk A; Schmied V BMJ Open; 2017 Aug; 7(8):e016288. PubMed ID: 28851782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Change in primary midwife-led care in the Netherlands in 2000-2008: a descriptive study of caesarean sections and other interventions among 789,795 low risk births. Offerhaus PM; de Jonge A; van der Pal-de Bruin KM; Hukkelhoven CW; Scheepers PL; Lagro-Janssen AL Midwifery; 2014 May; 30(5):560-6. PubMed ID: 23890793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Routine vaginal examinations for assessing progress of labour to improve outcomes for women and babies at term. Downe S; Gyte GM; Dahlen HG; Singata M Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Jul; (7):CD010088. PubMed ID: 23857468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women. Sandall J; Soltani H; Gates S; Shennan A; Devane D Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Apr; 4(4):CD004667. PubMed ID: 27121907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women. Sandall J; Soltani H; Gates S; Shennan A; Devane D Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Sep; (9):CD004667. PubMed ID: 26370160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]