501 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35488244)
1. Circular stapling anastomosis with indocyanine green fluorescence imaging for cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after thoracoscopic esophagectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis.
Shishido Y; Matsunaga T; Makinoya M; Miyauchi W; Shimizu S; Miyatani K; Uejima C; Morimoto M; Murakami Y; Hanaki T; Kihara K; Yamamoto M; Tokuyasu N; Takano S; Sakamoto T; Saito H; Hasegawa T; Fujiwara Y
BMC Surg; 2022 Apr; 22(1):152. PubMed ID: 35488244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. End-to-side circular stapled versus side-to-side linear stapled intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis following minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: comparison of short-term outcomes.
Fabbi M; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Fumagalli Romario U; Gandini S; Feenstra M; De Pascale S; Gisbertz SS
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Nov; 407(7):2681-2692. PubMed ID: 35639136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of hand-sewn and circular stapled esophagogastric anastomoses in the neck after esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.
Ozawa H; Kawakubo H; Nishimura E; Matsuda S; Takemura R; Irino T; Fukuda K; Nakamura R; Wada N; Kitagawa Y
Dis Esophagus; 2023 Feb; 36(3):. PubMed ID: 36222073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. 21- versus 25-mm Circular Staplers for Cervical Anastomosis: A Propensity-Matched Study.
Wang J; Yao F; Yao J; Xu L; Qian JL; Shan LM
J Surg Res; 2020 Feb; 246():427-434. PubMed ID: 31699537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Meta-Analysis of Two Different Methods for Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis: Triangulating Versus Circular Stapling.
Hua XY; Dong SY; Zhang SG
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2020 Nov; 30(11):1143-1149. PubMed ID: 32315563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Indocyanine green fluorescence imaging for evaluating blood flow in the reconstructed conduit after esophageal cancer surgery.
Koyanagi K; Ozawa S; Ninomiya Y; Yatabe K; Higuchi T; Yamamoto M; Kanamori K; Tajima K
Surg Today; 2022 Mar; 52(3):369-376. PubMed ID: 33977382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Totally mechanical Collard versus circular stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis for minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Liu H; Shan L; Wang J; Zhai R; Zhu Y; Yao F
Surg Endosc; 2023 Feb; 37(2):891-901. PubMed ID: 36038647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Circular stapling versus triangulating stapling for the cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy in patients with thoracic esophageal cancer: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial.
Hayata K; Nakamori M; Nakamura M; Ojima T; Iwahashi M; Katsuda M; Tsuji T; Kato T; Kitadani J; Takeuchi A; Tabata H; Yamaue H
Surgery; 2017 Jul; 162(1):131-138. PubMed ID: 28318550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the subtotal and narrow gastric conduit for cervical esophagogastrostomy after esophagectomy in esophageal cancer patients: a propensity score-matched analysis.
Sasaki K; Tsuruda Y; Shimonosono M; Noda M; Uchikado Y; Omoto I; Setoyama T; Matsushita D; Arigami T; Baba K; Kurahara H; Ohtsuka T
Esophagus; 2024 Jan; 21(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 37828145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Triangulating stapling vs functional end-to-end stapling for cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Tsuji T; Ojima T; Nakamori M; Nakamura M; Katsuda M; Hayata K; Kitadani J; Maruoka S; Shimokawa T; Yamaue H
Trials; 2019 Jan; 20(1):83. PubMed ID: 30691515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Totally Mechanical Collard Technique for Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis Reduces Stricture Formation Compared with Circular Stapled Anastomosis.
Hirano Y; Fujita T; Sato K; Kurita D; Sato T; Ishiyama K; Fujiwara H; Oguma J; Daiko H
World J Surg; 2020 Dec; 44(12):4175-4183. PubMed ID: 32783124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Risk factors of cervical anastomotic leakage after thoracoscopic-lapacoscopic esophagectomy in patients with esophageal carcinoma].
Zhao ZR; Feng H; Ma SR; Wang YC; Ma Q; Zhao GF; Zhang XL; Bai HJ; Zhao L
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2019 Jun; 41(6):460-465. PubMed ID: 31216834
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Which Anastomotic Techniques Is the Best Choice for Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis in Esophagectomy? A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.
Chen B; Xia P; Tang W; Huang S
J Gastrointest Surg; 2023 Feb; 27(2):422-432. PubMed ID: 36417036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Modified Collard technique is more effective than circular stapled for cervical esophagogastric anastomosis in prevention of anastomotic stricture: a propensity score-matched study.
Takeoka T; Miyata H; Sugimura K; Kanemura T; Sugase T; Yamamoto M; Shinno N; Hara H; Fujii Y; Mukai Y; Asukai K; Mikamori M; Hasegawa S; Akita H; Haraguchi N; Nishimura J; Wada H; Matsuda C; Omori T; Yasui M; Ohue M; Yano M
Dis Esophagus; 2023 Apr; 36(5):. PubMed ID: 37122247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pre-embedded cervical circular stapled anastomosis in esophagectomy.
Li J; Wang B; Liang T; Guo NN; Zhao M
Thorac Cancer; 2020 Mar; 11(3):723-727. PubMed ID: 32017456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Anastomosis oversewing technique to prevent leakage after oesophagectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis.
Tu DH; Qu R; Ping W; Yang G; Fu X; Cai Y
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2022 May; 61(5):990-998. PubMed ID: 35325107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Real-life introduction of powered circular stapler for esophagogastric anastomosis: cohort and propensity matched score study.
Vanstraelen S; Coosemans W; Depypere L; Mandeville Y; Moons J; Van Veer H; Nafteux P
Dis Esophagus; 2023 Apr; 36(5):. PubMed ID: 36222069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of end-to-side hand-sewn and side-to-side stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis in patients with lower thoracic esophageal cancer undergoing transhiatal esophagectomy: an Iranian retrospective cohort study.
Rasihashemi SZ; Ramouz A; Beheshtirouy S; Amini H
BMC Gastroenterol; 2020 Jul; 20(1):250. PubMed ID: 32736599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the outcomes between total eversion and conventional triangulating stapling technique in cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis.
Takahashi K; Watanabe M; Ushida Y; Kanie Y; Kozuki R; Toihata T; Otake R; Kanamori J; Okamura A; Imamura Y; Mine S
Esophagus; 2021 Jul; 18(3):475-481. PubMed ID: 33523356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging for prevention of anastomotic leak in totally minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Casas MA; Angeramo CA; Bras Harriott C; Dreifuss NH; Schlottmann F
Dis Esophagus; 2022 Apr; 35(4):. PubMed ID: 34378016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
