332 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35488246)
1. A comparative study of transperineal software-assisted magnetic resonance/ultrasound fusion biopsy and transrectal cognitive fusion biopsy of the prostate.
Hsieh PF; Chang TY; Lin WC; Chang H; Chang CH; Huang CP; Yang CR; Chen WC; Chang YH; Wang YD; Huang WC; Wu HC
BMC Urol; 2022 Apr; 22(1):72. PubMed ID: 35488246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Using Targeted Biopsy with Four Cores Versus Target Saturation Biopsy with Nine Cores in Transperineal Prostate Fusion Biopsy: A Prospective Randomized Trial.
Saner YM; Wiesenfarth M; Weru V; Ladyzhensky B; Tschirdewahn S; Püllen L; Bonekamp D; Reis H; Krafft U; Heß J; Kesch C; Darr C; Forsting M; Wetter A; Umutlu L; Haubold J; Hadaschik B; Radtke JP
Eur Urol Oncol; 2023 Feb; 6(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 36175281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Systematic and MRI-Cognitive Targeted Transperineal Prostate Biopsy Accuracy in Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer after Previous Negative Biopsy and Persisting Suspicion of Malignancy.
Vėželis A; Platkevičius G; Kinčius M; Gumbys L; Naruševičiūtė I; Briedienė R; Petroška D; Ulys A; Jankevičius F
Medicina (Kaunas); 2021 Jan; 57(1):. PubMed ID: 33435132
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A Multicentre Analysis of the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Following Transperineal Image-fusion Targeted and Nontargeted Systematic Prostate Biopsy in Men at Risk.
Miah S; Hosking-Jervis F; Connor MJ; Eldred-Evans D; Shah TT; Arya M; Barber N; Bhardwa J; Bott S; Burke D; Doherty A; Foster C; Freeman A; Hindley R; Jameson C; Karim O; Laniado M; Montgomery B; Nigam R; Punwani S; Sinclair A; Winkler M; Allen C; Ahmed HU
Eur Urol Oncol; 2020 Jun; 3(3):262-269. PubMed ID: 31411968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transperineal prostate biopsy with cognitive magnetic resonance imaging/biplanar ultrasound fusion: description of technique and early results.
Gorin MA; Meyer AR; Zimmerman M; Harb R; Joice GA; Schwen ZR; Allaf ME
World J Urol; 2020 Aug; 38(8):1943-1949. PubMed ID: 31679065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Magnetic Resonance and Ultrasound Image Fusion Supported Transperineal Prostate Biopsy Using the Ginsburg Protocol: Technique, Learning Points, and Biopsy Results.
Hansen N; Patruno G; Wadhwa K; Gaziev G; Miano R; Barrett T; Gnanapragasam V; Doble A; Warren A; Bratt O; Kastner C
Eur Urol; 2016 Aug; 70(2):332-40. PubMed ID: 26995327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robot-assisted Magnetic Resonance Imaging-ultrasound Fusion Transperineal Targeted Biopsy.
Lee AY; Chen K; Law YM; Ho HS; Cheng CW; Yuen JS; Tay KJ
Urology; 2021 Sep; 155():46. PubMed ID: 34186128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of transperineal and transrectal targeted prostate biopsy using Mahalanobis distance matching within propensity score caliper method: A multicenter study of Turkish Urooncology Association.
Koparal MY; Sözen TS; Karşıyakalı N; Aslan G; Akdoğan B; Şahin B; Türkeri L;
Prostate; 2022 Mar; 82(4):425-432. PubMed ID: 34927740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Do cancer detection rates differ between transperineal and transrectal micro-ultrasound mpMRI-fusion-targeted prostate biopsies? A propensity score-matched study.
Rakauskas A; Peters M; Martel P; van Rossum PSN; La Rosa S; Meuwly JY; Roth B; Valerio M
PLoS One; 2023; 18(1):e0280262. PubMed ID: 36652429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Single Center Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging against Transperineal Prostate Mapping Biopsy: An Analysis of Men with Benign Histology and Insignificant Cancer following Transrectal Ultrasound Biopsy.
Pal RP; Ahmad R; Trecartan S; Voss J; Ahmed S; Bazo A; Lloyd J; Walton TJ
J Urol; 2018 Aug; 200(2):302-308. PubMed ID: 29477717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multicentre evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging supported transperineal prostate biopsy in biopsy-naïve men with suspicion of prostate cancer.
Hansen NL; Barrett T; Kesch C; Pepdjonovic L; Bonekamp D; O'Sullivan R; Distler F; Warren A; Samel C; Hadaschik B; Grummet J; Kastner C
BJU Int; 2018 Jul; 122(1):40-49. PubMed ID: 29024425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Initial Experience with Transrectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Cognitive Guided Micro-Ultrasound Biopsies versus Established Transperineal Robotic Ultrasound Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Biopsies for Prostate Cancer.
Claros OR; Tourinho-Barbosa RR; Fregeville A; Gallardo AC; Muttin F; Carneiro A; Stabile A; Moschini M; Macek P; Cathala N; Mombet A; Sanchez-Salas R; Cathelineau X
J Urol; 2020 May; 203(5):918-925. PubMed ID: 31821099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Prospective Comparison of Transrectal Standard, Cognitive, Transperineal Fusion, and Mapping Prostate Biopsy for Cancer Detection.
Petov V; Bazarkin A; Morozov A; Taratkin M; Ganzha T; Danilov S; Chernov Y; Chinenov D; Rzayev R; Suvorov A; Amosov A; Fajkovic H; Enikeev D; Krupinov G
J Endourol; 2023 Aug; 37(8):940-947. PubMed ID: 37294206
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Multiparametric MRI-ultrasonography software fusion prostate biopsy: initial results using a stereotactic robotic-assisted transperineal prostate biopsy platform comparing systematic vs targeted biopsy.
Lee AYM; Yang XY; Lee HJ; Law YM; Huang HH; Lau WKO; Lee LS; Ho HSS; Tay KJ; Cheng CWS; Yuen JSP; Chen K
BJU Int; 2020 Nov; 126(5):568-576. PubMed ID: 32438463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Critical evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging targeted, transrectal ultrasound guided transperineal fusion biopsy for detection of prostate cancer.
Kuru TH; Roethke MC; Seidenader J; Simpfendörfer T; Boxler S; Alammar K; Rieker P; Popeneciu VI; Roth W; Pahernik S; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
J Urol; 2013 Oct; 190(4):1380-6. PubMed ID: 23608676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative analysis of transperineal template saturation prostate biopsy versus magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy with magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion guidance.
Radtke JP; Kuru TH; Boxler S; Alt CD; Popeneciu IV; Huettenbrink C; Klein T; Steinemann S; Bergstraesser C; Roethke M; Roth W; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
J Urol; 2015 Jan; 193(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 25079939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic Accuracy of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Fusion Guided Targeted Biopsy Evaluated by Transperineal Template Saturation Prostate Biopsy for the Detection and Characterization of Prostate Cancer.
Mortezavi A; Märzendorfer O; Donati OF; Rizzi G; Rupp NJ; Wettstein MS; Gross O; Sulser T; Hermanns T; Eberli D
J Urol; 2018 Aug; 200(2):309-318. PubMed ID: 29474846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of In-Office MRI/US Fusion Transperineal Prostate Biopsy via Free-hand Device during Routine Clinical Practice.
Briggs LG; Kim M; Gusev A; Rumpf F; Feldman A; McGovern F; Tabatabaei S; Dahl DM
Urology; 2021 Sep; 155():26-32. PubMed ID: 34048827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion-guided Transperineal Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion-guided Transrectal Prostate Biopsy-A Systematic Review.
Rai BP; Mayerhofer C; Somani BK; Kallidonis P; Nagele U; Tokas T
Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Dec; 4(6):904-913. PubMed ID: 33478936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: What Urologists Need to Know. Part 4: Transperineal Magnetic Resonance-Ultrasound Fusion Guided Biopsy Using Local Anesthesia.
Immerzeel J; Israël B; Bomers J; Schoots IG; van Basten JP; Kurth KH; de Reijke T; Sedelaar M; Debruyne F; Barentsz J
Eur Urol; 2022 Jan; 81(1):110-117. PubMed ID: 34799197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
