BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35490049)

  • 1. Does diffusion weighted imaging have a prognostic value in differentiating gynecological diseases?
    Dogan F; Karakas E; Karakas O; Camuzcuoglu H; Camuzcuoglu A; Kilicaslan N; Guldur ME
    Radiography (Lond); 2022 Aug; 28(3):711-717. PubMed ID: 35490049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantitative diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of normal and diseased uterine zones.
    Kilickesmez O; Bayramoglu S; Inci E; Cimilli T; Kayhan A
    Acta Radiol; 2009 Apr; 50(3):340-7. PubMed ID: 19235579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnostic accuracy of the apparent diffusion coefficient in differentiating benign from malignant uterine endometrial cavity lesions: initial results.
    Fujii S; Matsusue E; Kigawa J; Sato S; Kanasaki Y; Nakanishi J; Sugihara S; Kaminou T; Terakawa N; Ogawa T
    Eur Radiol; 2008 Feb; 18(2):384-9. PubMed ID: 17917730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diffusion-weighted MRI in the differential diagnosis of uterine endometrial cavity tumors.
    Karakas O; Karakas E; Dogan F; Kilicaslan N; Camuzcuoglu A; Incebiyik A; Camuzcuoglu H
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2015 Apr; 127(7-8):266-73. PubMed ID: 25708066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The utility of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in differentiation of uterine adenomyosis and leiomyoma.
    Yang Q; Zhang LH; Su J; Liu J
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Aug; 79(2):e47-51. PubMed ID: 21458180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) of adenomyosis and fibroids of the uterus.
    Jha RC; Zanello PA; Ascher SM; Rajan S
    Abdom Imaging; 2014 Jun; 39(3):562-9. PubMed ID: 24531353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The value of the apparent diffusion coefficient in differentiating stage IA endometrial carcinoma from normal endometrium and benign diseases of the endometrium: initial study at 3-T magnetic resonance scanner.
    Wang J; Yu T; Bai R; Sun H; Zhao X; Li Y
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2010; 34(3):332-7. PubMed ID: 20498531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can the apparent diffusion coefficient differentiate the grade of endometrioid adenocarcinoma and the histological subtype of endometrial cancer?
    Yan B; Zhao T; Liang X; Niu C; Ding C
    Acta Radiol; 2018 Mar; 59(3):363-370. PubMed ID: 28696169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diffusion-weighted single-shot echo-planar imaging with parallel technique in assessment of endometrial cancer.
    Shen SH; Chiou YY; Wang JH; Yen MS; Lee RC; Lai CR; Chang CY
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Feb; 190(2):481-8. PubMed ID: 18212236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of uterine endometrial cancer.
    Tamai K; Koyama T; Saga T; Umeoka S; Mikami Y; Fujii S; Togashi K
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Sep; 26(3):682-7. PubMed ID: 17729360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of endometrial cancer: differentiation from benign endometrial lesions and preoperative assessment of myometrial invasion.
    Takeuchi M; Matsuzaki K; Nishitani H
    Acta Radiol; 2009 Oct; 50(8):947-53. PubMed ID: 19724949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative analysis of the value of diffusion kurtosis imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging in evaluating the histological features of endometrial cancer.
    Yue W; Meng N; Wang J; Liu W; Wang X; Yan M; Han D; Cheng J
    Cancer Imaging; 2019 Feb; 19(1):9. PubMed ID: 30764876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Endometrial cancer: correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) with tumor cellularity and tumor grade.
    Kishimoto K; Tajima S; Maeda I; Takagi M; Ueno T; Suzuki N; Nakajima Y
    Acta Radiol; 2016 Aug; 57(8):1021-8. PubMed ID: 26486600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Apparent diffusion coefficient of diffusion weighted MRI in endometrial carcinoma-Relationship with local invasiveness.
    Cao K; Gao M; Sun YS; Li YL; Sun Y; Gao YN; Zhang XP
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Aug; 81(8):1926-30. PubMed ID: 21592709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of uterine cervical cancer.
    Liu Y; Bai R; Sun H; Liu H; Wang D
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(6):858-62. PubMed ID: 19940650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Utility of the relative apparent diffusion coefficient for preoperative assessment of low risk endometrial carcinoma.
    Shen Y; Lv F; Xiao Z; Bi Q
    Clin Imaging; 2019; 56():28-32. PubMed ID: 30851496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Combined use of T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted 3-T MR imaging for differentiating uterine sarcomas from benign leiomyomas.
    Namimoto T; Yamashita Y; Awai K; Nakaura T; Yanaga Y; Hirai T; Saito T; Katabuchi H
    Eur Radiol; 2009 Nov; 19(11):2756-64. PubMed ID: 19504102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Body diffusion-weighted MR imaging of uterine endometrial cancer: is it helpful in the detection of cancer in nonenhanced MR imaging?
    Inada Y; Matsuki M; Nakai G; Tatsugami F; Tanikake M; Narabayashi I; Yamada T; Tsuji M
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):122-7. PubMed ID: 18182265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation and validation of the diagnostic value of the apparent diffusion coefficient for differentiating early-stage endometrial carcinomas from benign mimickers at 3T MRI.
    Wang X; Zhao Y; Hu Y; Zhou Y; Ye X; Liu K; Bai G; Guo A; Du M; Jiang L; Wang J; Yan Z
    Oncotarget; 2017 Jul; 8(28):46390-46397. PubMed ID: 28634318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preoperative diagnosis of atypical pelvic leiomyoma and sarcoma: the potential role of diffusion-weighted imaging.
    Valdes-Devesa V; Jimenez MDM; Sanz-Rosa D; Espada Vaquero M; Alvarez Moreno E; Sainz de la Cuesta Abbad R
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 Jan; 39(1):98-104. PubMed ID: 30207503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.