BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35490210)

  • 1. Associations of severe adverse perinatal outcomes among continuous birth weight percentiles on different birth weight charts: a secondary analysis of a cluster randomized trial.
    Kamphof HD; Gordijn SJ; Ganzevoort W; Verfaille V; Offerhaus PM; Franx A; Pajkrt E; de Jonge A; Henrichs J
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2022 Apr; 22(1):375. PubMed ID: 35490210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Determination of birth-weight centile thresholds associated with adverse perinatal outcomes using population, customised, and Intergrowth charts: A Swedish population-based cohort study.
    Vieira MC; Relph S; Persson M; Seed PT; Pasupathy D
    PLoS Med; 2019 Sep; 16(9):e1002902. PubMed ID: 31539391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance of six birth-weight and estimated-fetal-weight standards for predicting adverse perinatal outcome: a 10-year nationwide population-based study.
    Choi SKY; Gordon A; Hilder L; Henry A; Hyett JA; Brew BK; Joseph F; Jorm L; Chambers GM
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Aug; 58(2):264-277. PubMed ID: 32672406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Small for gestational age at preterm birth identifies adverse neonatal outcomes more reliably than antenatal suspicion of fetal growth restriction.
    Alda MG; Holberton J; MacDonald TM; Charlton JK
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2023 Dec; 36(2):2279017. PubMed ID: 37981759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effectiveness of routine third trimester ultrasonography to reduce adverse perinatal outcomes in low risk pregnancy (the IRIS study): nationwide, pragmatic, multicentre, stepped wedge cluster randomised trial.
    Henrichs J; Verfaille V; Jellema P; Viester L; Pajkrt E; Wilschut J; van der Horst HE; Franx A; de Jonge A;
    BMJ; 2019 Oct; 367():l5517. PubMed ID: 31615781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prognostic value of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of brain in fetal growth restriction: results of prospective multicenter study.
    Jouannic JM; Blondiaux E; Senat MV; Friszer S; Adamsbaum C; Rousseau J; Hornoy P; Letourneau A; de Laveaucoupet J; Lecarpentier E; Rosenblatt J; Quibel T; Mollot M; Ancel PY; Alison M; Goffinet F
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Dec; 56(6):893-900. PubMed ID: 31765031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Identification of the optimal growth charts for use in a preterm population: An Australian state-wide retrospective cohort study.
    Pritchard NL; Hiscock RJ; Lockie E; Permezel M; McGauren MFG; Kennedy AL; Green B; Walker SP; Lindquist AC
    PLoS Med; 2019 Oct; 16(10):e1002923. PubMed ID: 31584941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of routine third trimester ultrasound screening for intrauterine growth restriction: study protocol of a nationwide stepped wedge cluster-randomized trial in The Netherlands (The IRIS Study).
    Henrichs J; Verfaille V; Viester L; Westerneng M; Molewijk B; Franx A; van der Horst H; Bosmans JE; de Jonge A; Jellema P;
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Oct; 16(1):310. PubMed ID: 27737654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. INTERGROWTH-21st compared with GROW customized centiles in the detection of adverse perinatal outcomes at term.
    Pritchard N; Lindquist A; Siqueira IDA; Walker SP; Permezel M
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2020 Mar; 33(6):961-966. PubMed ID: 30372647
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Customized birth-weight centiles and placenta-related fetal growth restriction.
    Melamed N; Hiersch L; Aviram A; Keating S; Kingdom JC
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Mar; 57(3):409-416. PubMed ID: 33073889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fetal growth restriction and intra-uterine growth restriction: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians.
    Vayssière C; Sentilhes L; Ego A; Bernard C; Cambourieu D; Flamant C; Gascoin G; Gaudineau A; Grangé G; Houfflin-Debarge V; Langer B; Malan V; Marcorelles P; Nizard J; Perrotin F; Salomon L; Senat MV; Serry A; Tessier V; Truffert P; Tsatsaris V; Arnaud C; Carbonne B
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Oct; 193():10-8. PubMed ID: 26207980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predictive index for adverse perinatal outcome in pregnancies complicated by fetal growth restriction.
    Powel JE; Zantow EW; Bialko MF; Farley LG; Lawlor ML; Mullan SJ; Vricella LK; Tomlinson TM
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Mar; 61(3):367-376. PubMed ID: 36856169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Which chart and which cut-point: deciding on the INTERGROWTH, World Health Organization, or Hadlock fetal growth chart.
    Liauw J; Mayer C; Albert A; Fernandez A; Hutcheon JA
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2022 Jan; 22(1):25. PubMed ID: 35012473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Routine ultrasound at 32 vs 36 weeks' gestation: prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates.
    Ciobanu A; Khan N; Syngelaki A; Akolekar R; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jun; 53(6):761-768. PubMed ID: 30883981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Two-stage approach for prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonate and adverse perinatal outcome by routine ultrasound examination at 35-37 weeks' gestation.
    Akolekar R; Panaitescu AM; Ciobanu A; Syngelaki A; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Oct; 54(4):484-491. PubMed ID: 31271475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fetal cerebral blood-flow redistribution: analysis of Doppler reference charts and association of different thresholds with adverse perinatal outcome.
    Wolf H; Stampalija T; Lees CC;
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 58(5):705-715. PubMed ID: 33599336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the performance of estimated fetal weight charts for the detection of small- and large-for-gestational age newborns with adverse outcomes: a French population-based study.
    Monier I; Ego A; Benachi A; Hocquette A; Blondel B; Goffinet F; Zeitlin J
    BJOG; 2022 May; 129(6):938-948. PubMed ID: 34797926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performances of birthweight charts to predict adverse perinatal outcomes related to SGA in a cohort of nulliparas.
    Galvão RB; Souza RT; Vieira MC; Pasupathy D; Mayrink J; Feitosa FE; Rocha Filho EA; Leite DF; Vettorazzi J; Calderon IM; Sousa MH; Cecatti JG;
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2022 Aug; 22(1):615. PubMed ID: 35927626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing population-based fetal growth standards in a US cohort.
    Gleason JL; Reddy UM; Chen Z; Grobman WA; Wapner RJ; Steller JG; Simhan H; Scifres CM; Blue N; Parry S; Grantz KL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Dec; ():. PubMed ID: 38151220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic accuracy of individual antenatal tools for prediction of small-for-gestational age at birth.
    Poljak B; Agarwal U; Jackson R; Alfirevic Z; Sharp A
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Apr; 49(4):493-499. PubMed ID: 27486031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.