These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35491921)

  • 1. More engagement but less participation: China's alternative approach to public communication of science and technology.
    Jia H
    Public Underst Sci; 2022 Apr; 31(3):331-339. PubMed ID: 35491921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Unbalanced progress: The hard road from science popularisation to public engagement with science in China.
    Jia H; Liu L
    Public Underst Sci; 2014 Jan; 23(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 24434709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. China's science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) research environment: A snapshot.
    Han X; Appelbaum RP
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0195347. PubMed ID: 29614123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dissemination or participation? Exploring scientists' definitions and science communication goals in the Netherlands.
    Nerghes A; Mulder B; Lee JS
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(12):e0277677. PubMed ID: 36454886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Social Media Use for Health Communication by the CDC in Mainland China: National Survey Study 2009-2020.
    Zeng R; Li M
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Dec; 22(12):e19470. PubMed ID: 33151892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The 'credibility paradox' in China's science communication: Views from scientific practitioners.
    Zhang JY
    Public Underst Sci; 2015 Nov; 24(8):913-27. PubMed ID: 26307594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Public health engagement: new opportunities and challenges in 60 years of China's health aid to Africa.
    Gao L; Xu J
    BMJ Glob Health; 2023 Aug; 8(8):. PubMed ID: 37652567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A triangulated approach for understanding scientists' perceptions of public engagement with science.
    Calice MN; Bao L; Beets B; Brossard D; Scheufele DA; Feinstein NW; Heisler L; Tangen T; Handelsman J
    Public Underst Sci; 2023 Apr; 32(3):389-406. PubMed ID: 36154528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dynamic development of public attitudes towards science policymaking.
    Okamura K
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 May; 25(4):465-79. PubMed ID: 26416555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. International institutions and China's health policy.
    Huang Y
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 2015 Feb; 40(1):41-71. PubMed ID: 25480846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Expanding public health in China: an empirical analysis of healthcare inputs and outputs.
    Deng F; Lv JH; Wang HL; Gao JM; Zhou ZL
    Public Health; 2017 Jan; 142():73-84. PubMed ID: 28057203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What is the public's role in 'space' policymaking? Images of the public by practitioners of 'space' communication in the United Kingdom.
    Entradas M
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 Jul; 25(5):603-11. PubMed ID: 25926503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Unfolding the Determinants of COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance in China.
    Yin F; Wu Z; Xia X; Ji M; Wang Y; Hu Z
    J Med Internet Res; 2021 Jan; 23(1):e26089. PubMed ID: 33400682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Engagement present and future: Graduate student and faculty perceptions of social media and the role of the public in science engagement.
    Howell EL; Nepper J; Brossard D; Xenos MA; Scheufele DA
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0216274. PubMed ID: 31048919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Static vs. dynamic methods of delivery for science communication: A critical analysis of user engagement with science on social media.
    Habibi SA; Salim L
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(3):e0248507. PubMed ID: 33788841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Scientists' opinions and attitudes towards citizens' understanding of science and their role in public engagement activities.
    Llorente C; Revuelta G; Carrió M; Porta M
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(11):e0224262. PubMed ID: 31721768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Exploring drivers for public engagement in social media communication with medical social influencers in China.
    Ngai CSB; Singh RG; Lu W
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(10):e0240303. PubMed ID: 33027269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Experiments in engagement: Designing public engagement with science and technology for capacity building.
    Selin C; Rawlings KC; de Ridder-Vignone K; Sadowski J; Altamirano Allende C; Gano G; Davies SR; Guston DH
    Public Underst Sci; 2017 Aug; 26(6):634-649. PubMed ID: 26769749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Public participation in environmental management in China: status quo and mode innovation.
    Chen M; Qian X; Zhang L
    Environ Manage; 2015 Mar; 55(3):523-35. PubMed ID: 25537155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An emerging form of public engagement with science: Ask Me Anything (AMA) sessions on Reddit r/science.
    Hara N; Abbazio J; Perkins K
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0216789. PubMed ID: 31091264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.