These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35492686)

  • 1. Decision-Making Within Forensic Psychiatric Investigations: The Use of Various Information Sources by Different Expert Groups to Reach Conclusions on Legal Insanity.
    Göranson L; Svensson O; Andiné P; Bromander S; Bagge AL; Karlén MH
    Front Psychiatry; 2022; 13():822519. PubMed ID: 35492686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Experts' decision-making processes in Swedish forensic psychiatric investigations: A case vignette study.
    Svensson O; Andiné P; Bromander S; Ask K; Lindqvist Bagge AS; Hildebrand Karlén M
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2024; 92():101947. PubMed ID: 38113666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Differences in psychiatric expertise of responsibility: Assessment and initial hypotheses through a review of literature].
    Guivarch J; Piercecchi-Marti MD; Glezer D; Chabannes JM
    Encephale; 2015 Jun; 41(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 25864036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Factors related to bias in forensic psychiatric assessments in criminal matters: A systematic review.
    Meyer LF; Valença AM
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2021; 75():101681. PubMed ID: 33712325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The medico-legal status of young sex offenders: forensic psychiatric evaluations in Sweden 1988-1995.
    Långström N; Grann M
    Behav Sci Law; 1999; 17(2):219-25. PubMed ID: 10398331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The decision-making process in Swedish forensic psychiatric investigations.
    Svensson O; Andiné P; Bromander S; Ask K; Lindqvist Bagge AS; Hildebrand Karlén M
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2022; 80():101709. PubMed ID: 34924110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The importance of the patients deemed not guilty by reason of insanity for the psychiatric reform.
    Douzenis A
    Psychiatriki; 2016; 27(3):165-168. PubMed ID: 27837570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Possibly mad? Marital murder in the early twentieth century: a matched-case gender analysis of forensic psychiatric investigations in Sweden.
    Karlén MH; Nilsson T
    Hist Psychiatry; 2023 Dec; 34(4):451-469. PubMed ID: 37766546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The factors associated with forensic psychiatrists' decisions in criminal responsibility and social dangerousness evaluations.
    Mandarelli G; Carabellese F; Felthous AR; Parmigiani G; Del Casale A; Catanesi R; Montalbò D; Ferracuti S
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2019; 66():101503. PubMed ID: 31706410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of concordance between conclusions of forensic psychiatric evaluation and court decisions after 2005 Criminal Code Amendment in a Taiwan psychiatric hospital.
    Yang TW; Yu JM; Pan CH
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2017; 54():148-154. PubMed ID: 28743408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. When insanity has gone undiscovered by the courts: The practice of the Norwegian Criminal Cases Review Commission in cases of doubts about insanity.
    Grøndahl P; Stridbeck U
    Crim Behav Ment Health; 2016 Jul; 26(3):212-24. PubMed ID: 26032297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. AAPL practice guideline for forensic psychiatric evaluation of defendants raising the insanity defense. American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.
    Giorgi-Guarnieri D; Janofsky J; Keram E; Lawsky S; Merideth P; Mossman D; Schwart-Watts D; Scott C; Thompson J; Zonana H;
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2002; 30(2 Suppl):S3-40. PubMed ID: 12099305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Differences in psychiatric expertise of responsibility for schizophrenic persons accused of murder: Study with experts of the Court of Appeal of Aix-en-Provence].
    Guivarch J; Piercecchi-Marti MD; Glezer D; Chabannes JM
    Encephale; 2016 Aug; 42(4):296-303. PubMed ID: 26471517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of gender on the outcome of forensic psychiatric assessment in Sweden: A case vignette study.
    Sygel K; Sturup J; Fors U; Edberg H; Gavazzeni J; Howner K; Persson M; Kristiansson M
    Crim Behav Ment Health; 2017 Apr; 27(2):124-135. PubMed ID: 26648167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evidence of gender bias in legal insanity evaluations: a case vignette study of clinicians, judges and students.
    Yourstone J; Lindholm T; Grann M; Svenson O
    Nord J Psychiatry; 2008; 62(4):273-8. PubMed ID: 18720232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validation of a new instrument to guide and support insanity evaluations: the defendant's insanity assessment support scale (DIASS).
    Parmigiani G; Mandarelli G; Roma P; Ferracuti S
    Transl Psychiatry; 2022 Mar; 12(1):115. PubMed ID: 35318308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The expert witness in forensic psychiatry.
    Chaplow DG; Peters JL; Kydd RR
    Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 1992 Dec; 26(4):624-30. PubMed ID: 1476528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Translational Application of a Neuro-Scientific Multi-Modal Approach Into Forensic Psychiatric Evaluation: Why and How?
    Scarpazza C; Miolla A; Zampieri I; Melis G; Sartori G; Ferracuti S; Pietrini P
    Front Psychiatry; 2021; 12():597918. PubMed ID: 33613339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accountability and psychiatric disorders: how do forensic psychiatric professionals think?
    Höglund P; Levander S; Anckarsäter H; Radovic S
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2009; 32(6):355-61. PubMed ID: 19811835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Insanity Defense: Past, Present, and Future.
    Math SB; Kumar CN; Moirangthem S
    Indian J Psychol Med; 2015; 37(4):381-7. PubMed ID: 26702167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.