These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35496070)

  • 1. Configural but Not Featural Face Information Is Associated With Automatic Processing.
    Wang H; Chen E; Li J; Ji F; Lian Y; Fu S
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2022; 16():884823. PubMed ID: 35496070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spatial attention modulates the temporal sequence of hemispheric asymmetry in configural and featural face processing.
    Wang H; Fu S
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Mar; 111():269-275. PubMed ID: 29374552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Double dissociation of configural and featural face processing on P1 and P2 components as a function of spatial attention.
    Wang H; Guo S; Fu S
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Aug; 53(8):1165-73. PubMed ID: 27167853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is it a face of a woman or a man? Visual mismatch negativity is sensitive to gender category.
    Kecskés-Kovács K; Sulykos I; Czigler I
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2013; 7():532. PubMed ID: 24027518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cultural Differences in the Time Course of Configural and Featural Processing for Own-race Faces.
    Wang H; Qiu R; Li W; Li S; Fu S
    Neuroscience; 2020 Oct; 446():157-170. PubMed ID: 32891705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spatial-frequency thresholds for configural and featural discriminations in upright and inverted faces.
    Watier NN; Collin CA; Boutet I
    Perception; 2010; 39(4):502-13. PubMed ID: 20514998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perceptual separability of featural and configural information in congenital prosopagnosia.
    Kimchi R; Behrmann M; Avidan G; Amishav R
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2012; 29(5-6):447-63. PubMed ID: 23428081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Two routes to face perception: evidence from psychophysics and computational modeling.
    Schwaninger A; Lobmaier JS; Wallraven C; Collishaw S
    Cogn Sci; 2009 Nov; 33(8):1413-40. PubMed ID: 21585511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automatic detection of orientation changes of faces versus non-face objects: a visual MMN study.
    Wang W; Miao D; Zhao L
    Biol Psychol; 2014 Jul; 100():71-8. PubMed ID: 24859423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Featural and configural face processing in adults and infants: a behavioral and electrophysiological investigation.
    Scott LS
    Perception; 2006; 35(8):1107-28. PubMed ID: 17076069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Features are also important: contributions of featural and configural processing to face recognition.
    Cabeza R; Kato T
    Psychol Sci; 2000 Sep; 11(5):429-33. PubMed ID: 11228917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visual Mismatch Negativity Reflects Enhanced Response to the Deviant: Evidence From Event-Related Potentials and Electroencephalogram Time-Frequency Analysis.
    Zeng X; Ji L; Liu Y; Zhang Y; Fu S
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2022; 16():800855. PubMed ID: 35350445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Processing of unattended facial emotions: a visual mismatch negativity study.
    Stefanics G; Csukly G; Komlósi S; Czobor P; Czigler I
    Neuroimage; 2012 Feb; 59(3):3042-9. PubMed ID: 22037000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Losing face: impaired discrimination of featural and configural information in the mouth region of an inverted face.
    Tanaka JW; Kaiser MD; Hagen S; Pierce LJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 May; 76(4):1000-14. PubMed ID: 24477773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Automatic detection of trustworthiness of the face: a visual mismatch negativity study.
    Kovács-Bálint Z; Stefanics G; Trunk A; Hernádi I
    Acta Biol Hung; 2014 Mar; 65(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 24561890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Emotion recognition: the role of featural and configural face information.
    Bombari D; Schmid PC; Schmid Mast M; Birri S; Mast FW; Lobmaier JS
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(12):2426-42. PubMed ID: 23679155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Featural and configural face processing strategies: evidence from a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.
    Lobmaier JS; Klaver P; Loenneker T; Martin E; Mast FW
    Neuroreport; 2008 Feb; 19(3):287-91. PubMed ID: 18303568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Configural and featural face processing are differently modulated by attentional resources at early stages: an event-related potential study with rapid serial visual presentation.
    Wang H; Sun P; Ip C; Zhao X; Fu S
    Brain Res; 2015 Mar; 1602():75-84. PubMed ID: 25601005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visual MMN elicited by orientation changes of faces.
    Wang W; Miao D; Zhao L
    J Integr Neurosci; 2014 Sep; 13(3):485-95. PubMed ID: 25164356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An other-race effect for configural and featural processing of faces: upper and lower face regions play different roles.
    Wang Z; Quinn PC; Tanaka JW; Yu X; Sun YH; Liu J; Pascalis O; Ge L; Lee K
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():559. PubMed ID: 26005427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.