These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35496070)

  • 21. Visual MMN elicited by orientation changes of faces.
    Wang W; Miao D; Zhao L
    J Integr Neurosci; 2014 Sep; 13(3):485-95. PubMed ID: 25164356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Automatic change detection and spatial attention: a visual mismatch negativity study.
    File D; Sulykos I; Czigler I
    Eur J Neurosci; 2020 Dec; 52(11):4423-4431. PubMed ID: 29766590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Automatic Processing of Changes in Facial Emotions in Dysphoria: A Magnetoencephalography Study.
    Xu Q; Ruohonen EM; Ye C; Li X; Kreegipuu K; Stefanics G; Luo W; Astikainen P
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2018; 12():186. PubMed ID: 29780315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Luo Y; Peng C; Liu C
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():100-11. PubMed ID: 20170647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Featural, configural, and holistic face-processing strategies evoke different scan patterns.
    Bombari D; Mast FW; Lobmaier JS
    Perception; 2009; 38(10):1508-21. PubMed ID: 19950482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Spatial Mechanisms within the Dorsal Visual Pathway Contribute to the Configural Processing of Faces.
    Zachariou V; Nikas CV; Safiullah ZN; Gotts SJ; Ungerleider LG
    Cereb Cortex; 2017 Aug; 27(8):4124-4138. PubMed ID: 27522076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Faces elicit different scanning patterns depending on task demands.
    Boutet I; Lemieux CL; Goulet MA; Collin CA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 May; 79(4):1050-1063. PubMed ID: 28185225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Aging Strikes the Self-Face Advantage in Featural Processing.
    Qian H; Wang Z; Yan L; Gao X
    Exp Aging Res; 2017; 43(4):379-390. PubMed ID: 28718751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Event-related potentials to unattended changes in facial expressions: detection of regularity violations or encoding of emotions?
    Astikainen P; Cong F; Ristaniemi T; Hietanen JK
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2013; 7():557. PubMed ID: 24062661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The respective role of low and high spatial frequencies in supporting configural and featural processing of faces.
    Goffaux V; Hault B; Michel C; Vuong QC; Rossion B
    Perception; 2005; 34(1):77-86. PubMed ID: 15773608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. ERP comparison study of face gender and expression processing in unattended condition.
    Wang S; Li W; Lv B; Chen X; Liu Y; Jiang Z
    Neurosci Lett; 2016 Apr; 618():39-44. PubMed ID: 26930625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The influence of left and right hemisphere brain damage on configural and featural processing of affective faces.
    Abbott JD; Wijeratne T; Hughes A; Perre D; Lindell AK
    Laterality; 2014; 19(4):455-72. PubMed ID: 24313800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Configural face processing develops more slowly than featural face processing.
    Mondloch CJ; Le Grand R; Maurer D
    Perception; 2002; 31(5):553-66. PubMed ID: 12044096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Unattended and attended visual change detection of motion as indexed by event-related potentials and its behavioral correlates.
    Kuldkepp N; Kreegipuu K; Raidvee A; Näätänen R; Allik J
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2013; 7():476. PubMed ID: 23966932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Visual mismatch negativity elicited by semantic violations in visual words.
    Hu A; Gu F; Wong LLN; Tong X; Zhang X
    Brain Res; 2020 Nov; 1746():147010. PubMed ID: 32663455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Hemispheric asymmetry in discriminating faces differing for featural or configural (second-order relations) aspects.
    Cattaneo Z; Renzi C; Bona S; Merabet LB; Carbon CC; Vecchi T
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Apr; 21(2):363-9. PubMed ID: 23888423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Automatic change detection: Mismatch negativity and the now-classic Rensink, O'Reagan, and Clark (1997) stimuli.
    File D; Petro B; Gaál ZA; Csikós N; Czigler I
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():975714. PubMed ID: 36092095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Automatic change detection of multiple facial expressions: A visual mismatch negativity study.
    Xiong M; Ding X; Kang T; Zhao X; Zhao J; Liu J
    Neuropsychologia; 2022 Jun; 170():108234. PubMed ID: 35421439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Automatic detection of irregular vanishing and reappearing parts of objects in two interwoven sequences: A visual mismatch negativity study.
    Csikós N; Petro B; Kojouharova P; Scheiling K; Gaál ZA; Czigler I
    Eur J Neurosci; 2023 May; 57(10):1736-1747. PubMed ID: 36999447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Are Faces Special to Infants? An Investigation of Configural and Featural Processing for the Upper and Lower Regions of Houses in 3- to 7-month-olds.
    Quinn PC; Tanaka JW; Lee K; Pascalis O; Slater AM
    Vis cogn; 2013 Jan; 21(1):23-37. PubMed ID: 24093003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.