165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35499639)
1. Robotic vs. Laparoscopic Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery, Outcomes over 5 Years in Nearly 800,000 Patients.
Wesley Vosburg R; Haque O; Roth E
Obes Surg; 2022 Jul; 32(7):2341-2348. PubMed ID: 35499639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Longitudinal Efficiency of Robotic Surgery: an MBSAQIP Propensity Matched 4-Year Comparison of Robotic and Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery.
Dudash M; Kuhn J; Dove J; Fluck M; Horsley R; Gabrielsen J; Daouadi M; Petrick AT; Parker DM
Obes Surg; 2020 Oct; 30(10):3706-3713. PubMed ID: 32495073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy: a propensity score-matched comparative analysis using the 2015-2016 MBSAQIP database.
Sebastian R; Howell MH; Chang KH; Adrales G; Magnuson T; Schweitzer M; Nguyen H
Surg Endosc; 2019 May; 33(5):1600-1612. PubMed ID: 30225604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic revisional bariatric surgery: perioperative outcomes from the MBSAQIP database.
Nasser H; Munie S; Kindel TL; Gould JC; Higgins RM
Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2020 Mar; 16(3):397-405. PubMed ID: 31932204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Outcomes in racial minorities after robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy: a retrospective review of the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database.
Acevedo E; Lu X; Zhao H; Mazzei M; Sarvepalli S; Edwards MA
Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2021 Mar; 17(3):595-605. PubMed ID: 33257274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Outcomes in conventional laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted revisional bariatric surgery: a retrospective, case-controlled study of the MBSAQIP database.
Acevedo E; Mazzei M; Zhao H; Lu X; Edwards MA
Surg Endosc; 2020 Apr; 34(4):1573-1584. PubMed ID: 31209611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Trends in the utilization and perioperative outcomes of primary robotic bariatric surgery from 2015 to 2018: a study of 46,764 patients from the MBSAQIP data registry.
Tatarian T; Yang J; Wang J; Docimo S; Talamini M; Pryor AD; Spaniolas K
Surg Endosc; 2021 Jul; 35(7):3915-3922. PubMed ID: 32737605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic approach to concurrent bariatric surgery and hiatal hernia repair: propensity score matching analysis using the 2015-2018 MBSAQIP.
Sebastian R; Ghanem OM; Cornejo J; Ruttger T; Mayuiers M; Adrales G; Li C
Surg Endosc; 2022 Sep; 36(9):6886-6895. PubMed ID: 35020060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is Robotic Revisional Bariatric Surgery Justified? An MBSAQIP Analysis.
Seton T; Mahan M; Dove J; Villanueva H; Obradovic V; Falvo A; Horsley R; Petrick A; Parker DM
Obes Surg; 2022 Dec; 32(12):3863-3868. PubMed ID: 36264443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Outcomes of robotic bariatric surgery in super-obese patients: first report based on MBSAQIP database.
Pastrana M; Stoltzfus J; Claros L; El Chaar M
Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2020 Jan; 16(1):71-79. PubMed ID: 31767380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Trends in Utilization and Perioperative Outcomes in Robotic-assisted Bariatric surgery using the MBSAQIP database: A 4-Year Analysis.
Scarritt T; Hsu CH; Maegawa FB; Ayala AE; Mobily M; Ghaderi I
Obes Surg; 2021 Feb; 31(2):854-861. PubMed ID: 33165753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Operative Time and 30-Day Outcomes in Bariatric Surgery: Comparison between Robotic and Laparoscopic Approach: 4-Year MBSAQIP Database Analysis.
Ho K; Hsu CH; Maegawa F; Ashouri Y; Ho H; Ajmal S; Ghaderi I
J Am Coll Surg; 2022 Jul; 235(1):138-144. PubMed ID: 35703971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Outcomes in conventional laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted primary bariatric surgery: a retrospective, case-controlled study of the MBSAQIP database.
Acevedo E; Mazzei M; Zhao H; Lu X; Soans R; Edwards MA
Surg Endosc; 2020 Mar; 34(3):1353-1365. PubMed ID: 31209608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robotic Bariatric Surgery in Older Adults, Is It Safer Than the Laparoscopic Approach? A 7-Year Analysis of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) Database.
Rahimi AO; Ashouri Y; Maegawa F; Hsu CH; Ghaderi I
Obes Surg; 2023 Sep; 33(9):2671-2678. PubMed ID: 37434018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Bariatric Surgery Compared to Standard Laparoscopic Approach Using a Standardized Definition: First Look at the 2020 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation Quality Improvement Project (MBSAQIP) Data.
El Chaar M; Petrick A; Clapp B; Stoltzfus J; Alvarado LA
Obes Surg; 2023 Jul; 33(7):2025-2039. PubMed ID: 37184827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. First Assistant In Bariatric Surgery: A Comparison Between Laparoscopic And Robotic Approaches: A 4-Year Analysis of the MBSAQIP Database (2016-2019).
Rahimi AO; Hsu CH; Maegawa F; Soliman D; King RJ; Ashouri Y; Ghaderi I
Obes Surg; 2024 Mar; 34(3):866-873. PubMed ID: 38114775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Thirty-day outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: first report based on Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database.
Chaar ME; Lundberg P; Stoltzfus J
Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2018 May; 14(5):545-551. PubMed ID: 29551470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of Robotic Assistance on Complications in Bariatric Surgery at Expert Laparoscopic Surgery Centers: A Retrospective Comparative Study With Propensity Score.
Caiazzo R; Bauvin P; Marciniak C; Saux P; Jacqmin G; Arnoux R; Benchetrit S; Dargent J; Chevallier JM; Frering V; Gugenheim J; Lechaux D; Msika S; Sterkers A; Topart P; Baud G; Pattou F;
Ann Surg; 2023 Oct; 278(4):489-496. PubMed ID: 37389476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Surgical trainee impact on bariatric surgery safety.
Goldberg I; Yang J; Park J; Pryor AD; Docimo S; Bates AT; Talamini MA; Spaniolas K
Surg Endosc; 2019 Sep; 33(9):3014-3025. PubMed ID: 30426255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A 3-Year MBSAQIP propensity-matched analysis of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with concomitant cholecystectomy: Is the robotic or laparoscopic approach preferred?
Falvo AM; Vacharathit V; Dove J; Fluck M; Daouadi M; Gabrielsen J; Horsley R; Petrick A; Parker DM
Surg Endosc; 2021 Aug; 35(8):4712-4718. PubMed ID: 32959181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
