137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35500431)
1. Generation of Calpain-3 knock-out porcine embryos by CRISPR-Cas9 electroporation and intracytoplasmic microinjection of oocytes before insemination.
Navarro-Serna S; Dehesa-Etxebeste M; Piñeiro-Silva C; Romar R; Lopes JS; López de Munaín A; Gadea J
Theriogenology; 2022 Jul; 186():175-184. PubMed ID: 35500431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Oocyte electroporation prior to in vitro fertilization is an efficient method to generate single, double, and multiple knockout porcine embryos of interest in biomedicine and animal production.
Navarro-Serna S; Piñeiro-Silva C; Fernández-Martín I; Dehesa-Etxebeste M; López de Munain A; Gadea J
Theriogenology; 2024 Apr; 218():111-118. PubMed ID: 38320372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the effects of introducing the CRISPR/Cas9 system by microinjection and electroporation into porcine embryos at different stages.
Le QA; Tanihara F; Wittayarat M; Namula Z; Sato Y; Lin Q; Takebayashi K; Hirata M; Otoi T
BMC Res Notes; 2021 Jan; 14(1):7. PubMed ID: 33407863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Timing of CRISPR/Cas9-related mRNA microinjection after activation as an important factor affecting genome editing efficiency in porcine oocytes.
Sato M; Kosuke M; Koriyama M; Inada E; Saitoh I; Ohtsuka M; Nakamura S; Sakurai T; Watanabe S; Miyoshi K
Theriogenology; 2018 Mar; 108():29-38. PubMed ID: 29195121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Simplified pipelines for genetic engineering of mammalian embryos by CRISPR-Cas9 electroporation†.
Miao D; Giassetti MI; Ciccarelli M; Lopez-Biladeau B; Oatley JM
Biol Reprod; 2019 Jul; 101(1):177-187. PubMed ID: 31095680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimizing oocyte electroporation for genetic modification of porcine embryos: Evaluation of the parthenogenetic activation.
Piñeiro-Silva C; Gadea J
Theriogenology; 2024 Apr; 218():126-136. PubMed ID: 38325149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of ARTEMIS (DCLRE1C) deficiency and microinjection timing on editing efficiency during somatic cell nuclear transfer and in vitro fertilization using the CRISPR/Cas9 system.
Li Y; Adur MK; Wang W; Schultz RB; Hale B; Wierson W; Charley SE; McGrail M; Essner J; Tuggle CK; Ross JW
Theriogenology; 2021 Aug; 170():107-116. PubMed ID: 34004455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of ICSI, IVF, and in vivo derived embryos to produce CRISPR-Cas9 gene-edited pigs for xenotransplantation.
Briski O; La Motta GE; Ratner LD; Allegroni FA; Pillado S; Álvarez G; Gutierrez B; Tarragona L; Zaccagnini A; Acerbo M; Ciampi C; Fernández-Martin R; Salamone DF
Theriogenology; 2024 May; 220():43-55. PubMed ID: 38471390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Generation of Nonmosaic, Two-Pore Channel 2 Biallelic Knockout Pigs in One Generation by CRISPR-Cas9 Microinjection Before Oocyte Insemination.
Navarro-Serna S; Hachem A; Canha-Gouveia A; Hanbashi A; Garrappa G; Lopes JS; París-Oller E; Sarrías-Gil L; Flores-Flores C; Bassett A; Sánchez R; Bermejo-Álvarez P; Matás C; Romar R; Parrington J; Gadea J
CRISPR J; 2021 Feb; 4(1):132-146. PubMed ID: 33616447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Gene editing in porcine embryos using a combination of electroporation and transfection methods.
Takebayashi K; Wittayarat M; Lin Q; Hirata M; Yoshimura N; Torigoe N; Nagahara M; Do LTK; Tanihara F; Otoi T
Reprod Domest Anim; 2022 Oct; 57(10):1136-1142. PubMed ID: 35699358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. GEEP Method: An Optimized Electroporation-Mediated Gene Editing Approach for Establishment of Knockout Pig Lines.
Tanihara F; Hirata M; Otoi T
Methods Mol Biol; 2023; 2637():293-300. PubMed ID: 36773155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Amount of Cas9 protein introduced into mouse embryos via electroporation affects the genome-editing rate.
Wake Y; Vakulskas CA; Glenn SE; Kaneko T
J Reprod Dev; 2022 Oct; 68(5):307-311. PubMed ID: 35831117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Targeted Transgenic Mice Using CRISPR /Cas9 Technology.
El Marjou F; Jouhanneau C; Krndija D
Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2214():125-141. PubMed ID: 32944907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of voltage strength during electroporation on the development and quality of in vitro-produced porcine embryos.
Nishio K; Tanihara F; Nguyen TV; Kunihara T; Nii M; Hirata M; Takemoto T; Otoi T
Reprod Domest Anim; 2018 Apr; 53(2):313-318. PubMed ID: 29135047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Genome editing of rodents by electroporation of CRISPR/Cas9 into frozen-warmed pronuclear-stage embryos.
Kaneko T; Nakagawa Y
Cryobiology; 2020 Feb; 92():231-234. PubMed ID: 31987837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Introduction of a point mutation in the KRAS gene of in vitro fertilized porcine zygotes via electroporation of the CRISPR/Cas9 system with single-stranded oligodeoxynucleotides.
Wittayarat M; Hirata M; Namula Z; Sato Y; Nguyen NT; Le QA; Lin Q; Takebayashi K; Tanihara F; Otoi T
Anim Sci J; 2021; 92(1):e13534. PubMed ID: 33638256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Electroporation and genetic supply of Cas9 increase the generation efficiency of CRISPR/Cas9 knock-in alleles in C57BL/6J mouse zygotes.
Alghadban S; Bouchareb A; Hinch R; Hernandez-Pliego P; Biggs D; Preece C; Davies B
Sci Rep; 2020 Oct; 10(1):17912. PubMed ID: 33087834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Delivery of CRISPR-Cas9 into Mouse Zygotes by Electroporation.
Qin W; Wang H
Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1874():179-190. PubMed ID: 30353514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Generation of
Tanihara F; Hirata M; Nguyen NT; Le QA; Wittayarat M; Fahrudin M; Hirano T; Otoi T
Anim Biotechnol; 2021 Apr; 32(2):147-154. PubMed ID: 31558095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Transgenic Expression and Genome Editing by Electroporation of Zebrafish Embryos.
Zhang C; Ren Z; Gong Z
Mar Biotechnol (NY); 2020 Oct; 22(5):644-650. PubMed ID: 32748174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
