These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35500523)

  • 1. Lane-change intention prediction using eye-tracking technology: A systematic review.
    Pan Y; Zhang Q; Zhang Y; Ge X; Gao X; Yang S; Xu J
    Appl Ergon; 2022 Sep; 103():103775. PubMed ID: 35500523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A proactive lane-changing risk prediction framework considering driving intention recognition and different lane-changing patterns.
    Shangguan Q; Fu T; Wang J; Fang S; Fu L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Jan; 164():106500. PubMed ID: 34823098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detecting lane change maneuvers using SHRP2 naturalistic driving data: A comparative study machine learning techniques.
    Das A; Khan MN; Ahmed MM
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Jul; 142():105578. PubMed ID: 32408143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lane-change intention recognition considering oncoming traffic: Novel insights revealed by advances in deep learning.
    Liu H; Wang T; Li W; Ye X; Yuan Q
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Apr; 198():107476. PubMed ID: 38325183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Learning-Based Lane-Change Behaviour Detection for Intelligent and Connected Vehicles.
    Du L; Chen W; Pei Z; Zheng H; Fu S; Chen K; Wu D
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2020; 2020():8848363. PubMed ID: 33061950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Classification of Driver Distraction: A Comprehensive Analysis of Feature Generation, Machine Learning, and Input Measures.
    McDonald AD; Ferris TK; Wiener TA
    Hum Factors; 2020 Sep; 62(6):1019-1035. PubMed ID: 31237788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prediction of Driver's Intention of Lane Change by Augmenting Sensor Information Using Machine Learning Techniques.
    Kim IH; Bong JH; Park J; Park S
    Sensors (Basel); 2017 Jun; 17(6):. PubMed ID: 28604582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A review on utilizing machine learning technology in the fields of electronic emergency triage and patient priority systems in telemedicine: Coherent taxonomy, motivations, open research challenges and recommendations for intelligent future work.
    Salman OH; Taha Z; Alsabah MQ; Hussein YS; Mohammed AS; Aal-Nouman M
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2021 Sep; 209():106357. PubMed ID: 34438223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Driver Behavior During Overtaking Maneuvers from the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study.
    Chen R; Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S176-81. PubMed ID: 26436229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Novel Intelligent Approach to Lane-Change Behavior Prediction for Intelligent and Connected Vehicles.
    Du L; Chen W; Ji J; Pei Z; Tong B; Zheng H
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2022; 2022():9516218. PubMed ID: 35082845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spatiotemporal Feature Enhancement Aids the Driving Intention Inference of Intelligent Vehicles.
    Chen H; Chen H; Liu H; Feng X
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Sep; 19(18):. PubMed ID: 36142087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Data-driven modeling and prediction of blood glucose dynamics: Machine learning applications in type 1 diabetes.
    Woldaregay AZ; Årsand E; Walderhaug S; Albers D; Mamykina L; Botsis T; Hartvigsen G
    Artif Intell Med; 2019 Jul; 98():109-134. PubMed ID: 31383477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multi-Modal Vehicle Trajectory Prediction by Collaborative Learning of Lane Orientation, Vehicle Interaction, and Intention.
    Tian W; Wang S; Wang Z; Wu M; Zhou S; Bi X
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Jun; 22(11):. PubMed ID: 35684916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Driver trust in five driver assistance technologies following real-world use in four production vehicles.
    Kidd DG; Cicchino JB; Reagan IJ; Kerfoot LB
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 May; 18(sup1):S44-S50. PubMed ID: 28339302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Emotion Recognition Using Eye-Tracking: Taxonomy, Review and Current Challenges.
    Lim JZ; Mountstephens J; Teo J
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Apr; 20(8):. PubMed ID: 32331327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Eye-Tracking Feature Extraction for Biometric Machine Learning.
    Lim JZ; Mountstephens J; Teo J
    Front Neurorobot; 2021; 15():796895. PubMed ID: 35177973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Driver Intent-Based Intersection Autonomous Driving Collision Avoidance Reinforcement Learning Algorithm.
    Chen T; Chen Y; Li H; Gao T; Tu H; Li S
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Dec; 22(24):. PubMed ID: 36560308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Class-imbalanced crash prediction based on real-time traffic and weather data: A driving simulator study.
    Elamrani Abou Elassad Z; Mousannif H; Al Moatassime H
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2020; 21(3):201-208. PubMed ID: 32125890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating driver drowsiness countermeasures.
    Gaspar JG; Brown TL; Schwarz CW; Lee JD; Kang J; Higgins JS
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 May; 18(sup1):S58-S63. PubMed ID: 28323444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Haptic Lane-Keeping Assistance for Truck Driving: A Test Track Study.
    Roozendaal J; Johansson E; Winter J; Abbink D; Petermeijer S
    Hum Factors; 2021 Dec; 63(8):1380-1395. PubMed ID: 32551951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.