318 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35501062)
21. Computed Tomographic Angiography Perforator Localization for Virtual Surgical Planning of Osteocutaneous Fibular Free Flaps in Head and Neck Reconstruction.
Ettinger KS; Alexander AE; Arce K
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Oct; 76(10):2220-2230. PubMed ID: 29730061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. EPPOCRATIS: Expedited Preoperative Point-of-Care Reduction of Fractures to Normalized Anatomy and Three-Dimensional Printing to Improve Surgical Outcomes.
Sharaf B; Kuruoglu D; Cantwell SR; Alexander AE; Dickens HJ; Morris JM
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2022 Mar; 149(3):695-699. PubMed ID: 35196689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A Craniomaxillofacial Surgical Assistance Workstation for Enhanced Single-Stage Reconstruction Using Patient-Specific Implants.
Murphy RJ; Liacouras PC; Grant GT; Wolfe KC; Armand M; Gordon CR
J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Nov; 27(8):2025-2030. PubMed ID: 28005747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Advances in oncologic head and neck reconstruction: systematic review and future considerations of virtual surgical planning and computer aided design/computer aided modeling.
Rodby KA; Turin S; Jacobs RJ; Cruz JF; Hassid VJ; Kolokythas A; Antony AK
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2014 Sep; 67(9):1171-85. PubMed ID: 24880575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Use of 3-Dimensional Printing Technology in Complex Spine Surgeries.
Lador R; Regev G; Salame K; Khashan M; Lidar Z
World Neurosurg; 2020 Jan; 133():e327-e341. PubMed ID: 31520760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Osseous Transformation with Facial Feminization Surgery: Improved Anatomical Accuracy with Virtual Planning.
Gray R; Nguyen K; Lee JC; Deschamps-Braly J; Bastidas N; Tanna N; Bradley JP
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Nov; 144(5):1159-1168. PubMed ID: 31397786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Virtual 3D planning of osteotomies for craniosynostoses and complex craniofacial malformations.
Laure B; Louisy A; Joly A; Travers N; Listrat A; Pare A
Neurochirurgie; 2019 Nov; 65(5):269-278. PubMed ID: 31568779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Systematic review of the software used for virtual surgical planning in craniomaxillofacial surgery over the last decade.
Tel A; Arboit L; De Martino M; Isola M; Sembronio S; Robiony M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2023 Jul; 52(7):775-786. PubMed ID: 36481124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Cranial reconstruction: 3D biomodel and custom-built implant created using additive manufacturing.
Jardini AL; Larosa MA; Maciel Filho R; Zavaglia CA; Bernardes LF; Lambert CS; Calderoni DR; Kharmandayan P
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1877-84. PubMed ID: 25175080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The evolving roles of computer-based technology and smartphone applications in facial plastic surgery.
Kayastha D; Vakharia KT
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2019 Aug; 27(4):267-273. PubMed ID: 31157662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Quantitative Assessment of Point-of-Care 3D-Printed Patient-Specific Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Cranial Implants.
Sharma N; Aghlmandi S; Dalcanale F; Seiler D; Zeilhofer HF; Honigmann P; Thieringer FM
Int J Mol Sci; 2021 Aug; 22(16):. PubMed ID: 34445228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Single-Unit 3D-Printed Titanium Reconstruction Plate for Maxillary Reconstruction: The Evolution of Surgical Reconstruction for Maxillary Defects-A Case Report and Review of Current Techniques.
Melville JC; Manis CS; Shum JW; Alsuwied D
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Apr; 77(4):874.e1-874.e13. PubMed ID: 30615849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Traditional Versus Virtual Surgery Planning of the Fronto-Orbital Unit in Anterior Cranial Vault Remodeling Surgery.
Ganesh P; Mahipathy SRRV; Rajan VTT; Sundaramurthy N; Durairaj AR; Jayachandiran AP; Nagarjuna M
J Craniofac Surg; 2021 Jan-Feb 01; 32(1):285-289. PubMed ID: 32969924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Virtual surgical planning in fibula free flap head and neck reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Tang NSJ; Ahmadi I; Ramakrishnan A
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2019 Sep; 72(9):1465-1477. PubMed ID: 31324403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Craniosynostosis surgery: workflow based on virtual surgical planning, intraoperative navigation and 3D printed patient-specific guides and templates.
García-Mato D; Ochandiano S; García-Sevilla M; Navarro-Cuéllar C; Darriba-Allés JV; García-Leal R; Calvo-Haro JA; Pérez-Mañanes R; Salmerón JI; Pascau J
Sci Rep; 2019 Nov; 9(1):17691. PubMed ID: 31776390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A New Classification of Three-Dimensional Printing Technologies: Systematic Review of Three-Dimensional Printing for Patient-Specific Craniomaxillofacial Surgery.
Jacobs CA; Lin AY
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2017 May; 139(5):1211-1220. PubMed ID: 28445375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Point of care virtual surgical planning and 3D printing in facial gender confirmation surgery: a narrative review.
Kuruoglu D; Yan M; Bustos SS; Morris JM; Alexander AE; Sharaf B
Ann Transl Med; 2021 Apr; 9(7):614. PubMed ID: 33987312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Three-dimensional preoperative virtual planning and template use for surgical correction of craniosynostosis.
Mardini S; Alsubaie S; Cayci C; Chim H; Wetjen N
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2014 Mar; 67(3):336-43. PubMed ID: 24333232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. In-House Surgeon-Led Virtual Surgical Planning for Maxillofacial Reconstruction.
Abo Sharkh H; Makhoul N
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Apr; 78(4):651-660. PubMed ID: 31843280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Virtual surgical planning and 3D printing in prosthetic orbital reconstruction with percutaneous implants: a technical case report.
Huang YH; Seelaus R; Zhao L; Patel PK; Cohen M
Int Med Case Rep J; 2016; 9():341-345. PubMed ID: 27843356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
