198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35501423)
1. Association of breast cancer risk, density, and stiffness: global tissue stiffness on breast MR elastography (MRE).
Patel BK; Pepin K; Brandt KR; Mazza GL; Pockaj BA; Chen J; Zhou Y; Northfelt DW; Anderson K; Kling JM; Vachon CM; Swanson KR; Nikkhah M; Ehman R
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2022 Jul; 194(1):79-89. PubMed ID: 35501423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantification of breast stiffness using MR elastography at 3 Tesla with a soft sternal driver: A reproducibility study.
Hawley JR; Kalra P; Mo X; Raterman B; Yee LD; Kolipaka A
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 May; 45(5):1379-1384. PubMed ID: 27779802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. MR Elastography of the Breast: Evolution of Technique, Case Examples, and Future Directions.
Patel BK; Samreen N; Zhou Y; Chen J; Brandt K; Ehman R; Pepin K
Clin Breast Cancer; 2021 Feb; 21(1):e102-e111. PubMed ID: 32900617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the Effect of Age, Menopausal Status, and Parity on Breast Parenchyma Stiffness by Multiparametric Shear Wave Elastography.
Sanli DET; Yildirim D
Acad Radiol; 2022 Jan; 29 Suppl 1():S62-S68. PubMed ID: 34702676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantitative background parenchymal enhancement and fibro-glandular density at breast MRI: Association with BRCA status.
Goodburn R; Kousi E; Sanders C; Macdonald A; Scurr E; Bunce C; Khabra K; Reddy M; Wilkinson L; O'Flynn E; Allen S; Schmidt MA
Eur Radiol; 2023 Sep; 33(9):6204-6212. PubMed ID: 37017702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Uterine fibroids: correlations between MRI appearance and stiffness via magnetic resonance elastography.
Jondal DE; Wang J; Chen J; Gorny KR; Felmlee J; Hesly G; Laughlin-Tommaso S; Stewart EA; Ehman R; Woodrum DA
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2018 Jun; 43(6):1456-1463. PubMed ID: 28952003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. High-resolution magnetic resonance elastography reveals differences in subcortical gray matter viscoelasticity between young and healthy older adults.
Hiscox LV; Johnson CL; McGarry MDJ; Perrins M; Littlejohn A; van Beek EJR; Roberts N; Starr JM
Neurobiol Aging; 2018 May; 65():158-167. PubMed ID: 29494862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessing Quantitative Parenchymal Features at Baseline Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI and Cancer Occurrence in Women with Extremely Dense Breasts.
Wang H; van der Velden BHM; Verburg E; Bakker MF; Pijnappel RM; Veldhuis WB; van Gils CH; Gilhuijs KGA
Radiology; 2023 Aug; 308(2):e222841. PubMed ID: 37552061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Factors Associated With Background Parenchymal Enhancement on Contrast-Enhanced Mammography.
Karimi Z; Phillips J; Slanetz P; Lotfi P; Dialani V; Karimova J; Mehta T
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Feb; 216(2):340-348. PubMed ID: 32755162
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Value of whole breast magnetic resonance elastography added to MRI for lesion characterization.
Balleyguier C; Lakhdar AB; Dunant A; Mathieu MC; Delaloge S; Sinkus R
NMR Biomed; 2018 Jan; 31(1):. PubMed ID: 29073719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ultrasound and Clinical Characteristics of False-negative Results in Mammography Screening of Dense Breasts.
Pu H; Peng J; Xu F; Liu N; Wang F; Huang X; Jia Y
Clin Breast Cancer; 2020 Aug; 20(4):317-325. PubMed ID: 32229176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Risk stratification in primary sclerosing cholangitis: comparison of biliary stricture severity on MRCP versus liver stiffness by MR elastography and vibration-controlled transient elastography.
Tafur M; Cheung A; Menezes RJ; Feld J; Janssen H; Hirschfield GM; Jhaveri KS
Eur Radiol; 2020 Jul; 30(7):3735-3747. PubMed ID: 32130494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. 3D MR elastography of the pancreas in children.
Serai SD; Abu-El-Haija M; Trout AT
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 May; 44(5):1834-1840. PubMed ID: 30683979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical utility of 3D magnetic resonance elastography in patients with biliary obstruction.
Ma Y; Wang G; Gao F; Ma B; Song Q; Zhong S; Liu Y; Hong Y
Eur Radiol; 2022 Mar; 32(3):2050-2059. PubMed ID: 34791513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantifying Tumor Stiffness With Magnetic Resonance Elastography: The Role of Mechanical Properties for Detection, Characterization, and Treatment Stratification in Oncology.
Pepin KM; McGee KP
Top Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Oct; 27(5):353-362. PubMed ID: 30289830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mammographic density, MRI background parenchymal enhancement and breast cancer risk.
Pike MC; Pearce CL
Ann Oncol; 2013 Nov; 24 Suppl 8(Suppl 8):viii37-viii41. PubMed ID: 24131968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The value of quantitative MR elastography-based stiffness for assessing the microvascular invasion grade in hepatocellular carcinoma.
Zhang L; Li M; Zhu J; Zhang Y; Xiao Y; Dong M; Zhang L; Wang J
Eur Radiol; 2023 Jun; 33(6):4103-4114. PubMed ID: 36435877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Preoperative assessment of meningioma stiffness using magnetic resonance elastography.
Murphy MC; Huston J; Glaser KJ; Manduca A; Meyer FB; Lanzino G; Morris JM; Felmlee JP; Ehman RL
J Neurosurg; 2013 Mar; 118(3):643-8. PubMed ID: 23082888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ultrasound Elastography and MR Elastography for Assessing Liver Fibrosis: Part 1, Principles and Techniques.
Tang A; Cloutier G; Szeverenyi NM; Sirlin CB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jul; 205(1):22-32. PubMed ID: 25905647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Liver stiffness by magnetic resonance elastography is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.
Park JG; Jung J; Verma KK; Kang MK; Madamba E; Lopez S; Qas Yonan A; Liu A; Bettencourt R; Sirlin C; Loomba R
Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2021 May; 53(9):1030-1037. PubMed ID: 33764550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
