These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35501438)
21. The step towards environmental mitigation in Pakistan: do transportation services, urbanization, and financial development matter? Godil DI; Ahmad P; Ashraf MS; Sarwat S; Sharif A; Shabib-Ul-Hasan S; Jermsittiparsert K Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 May; 28(17):21486-21498. PubMed ID: 33415625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Does economic globalization have predictive power for ecological footprint in MENA counties? A panel causality test with a Fourier function. Yilanci V; Gorus MS Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Nov; 27(32):40552-40562. PubMed ID: 32666448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The impact of electricity consumption on CO Bello MO; Solarin SA; Yen YY J Environ Manage; 2018 Aug; 219():218-230. PubMed ID: 29747103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Does information and communication technologies improve environmental quality in the era of globalization? An empirical analysis. Haseeb A; Xia E; Saud S; Ahmad A; Khurshid H Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Mar; 26(9):8594-8608. PubMed ID: 30710332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The impact of globalization on the ecological footprint: do convergence clubs matter? Apaydin Ş; Ursavaş U; Koç Ü Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Oct; 28(38):53379-53393. PubMed ID: 34031829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The effect of carbon dioxide emission and the consumption of electrical energy, fossil fuel energy, and renewable energy, on economic performance: evidence from Pakistan. Rehman A; Rauf A; Ahmad M; Chandio AA; Deyuan Z Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Jul; 26(21):21760-21773. PubMed ID: 31134543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Analyzing asymmetric ecological performance under structural change, technological innovation, and trade diversification: fresh insights from the USA. Islam MM; Ahmad P; Shabir M; Usman M; Kamal M Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Nov; 30(54):115164-115184. PubMed ID: 37878170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Does globalization and ecological footprint in OECD lead to national happiness. Wang Y; Arshed N; Ghulam Shabeer M; Munir M; Rehman HU; Khan YA PLoS One; 2023; 18(10):e0288630. PubMed ID: 37874811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Exploring the role of fossil fuels, hydroelectricity consumption, and financial sector in ensuring sustainable economic development in the emerging economy. Faisal F; Khan MN; Pervaiz R; Muhamad PM; Rashdan MOJ Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Feb; 28(5):5953-5965. PubMed ID: 32981018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The influences of renewable electricity generation, technological innovation, financial development, and economic growth on ecological footprints in ASEAN-5 countries. Zeraibi A; Balsalobre-Lorente D; Murshed M Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Oct; 28(37):51003-51021. PubMed ID: 33973125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Mitigating energy production-based carbon dioxide emissions in Argentina: the roles of renewable energy and economic globalization. Murshed M; Rashid S; Ulucak R; Dagar V; Rehman A; Alvarado R; Nathaniel SP Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Mar; 29(12):16939-16958. PubMed ID: 34655033 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The mediating role of ICTs in the relationship between international tourism and environmental degradation: fit as a fiddle. Anser MK; Khan MA; Nassani AA; Askar SE; Abro MMQ; Zaman K; Kabbani A Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Dec; 28(45):63769-63783. PubMed ID: 33180288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The impact of natural resource abundance on ecological footprint: evidence from Algeria. Chekouri SM; Chibi A; Benbouziane M Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Jun; 30(26):69289-69306. PubMed ID: 37131008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Does globalization matter for ecological footprint in Turkey? Evidence from dual adjustment approach. Kirikkaleli D; Adebayo TS; Khan Z; Ali S Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Mar; 28(11):14009-14017. PubMed ID: 33201501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. In the era of globalization, can renewable energy and eco-innovation be viable for environmental sustainability in BRICS economies? Ojekemi OS; Ağa M Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Aug; 30(36):85249-85262. PubMed ID: 37386217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Does globalization increase the ecological footprint? Empirical evidence from Malaysia. Ahmed Z; Wang Z; Mahmood F; Hafeez M; Ali N Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Jun; 26(18):18565-18582. PubMed ID: 31054053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Idolization and ramification between globalization and ecological footprints: evidence from quantile-on-quantile approach. Sharif A; Afshan S; Qureshi MA Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Apr; 26(11):11191-11211. PubMed ID: 30796670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. BRICS carbon neutrality target: Measuring the impact of electricity production from renewable energy sources and globalization. Juan Lin ; Shen Y; Li X; Hasnaoui A J Environ Manage; 2021 Nov; 298():113460. PubMed ID: 34391106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Does globalization in Turkey induce increased energy consumption: insights into its environmental pros and cons. Etokakpan MU; Adedoyin FF; Vedat Y; Bekun FV Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Jul; 27(21):26125-26140. PubMed ID: 32358749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Asymmetric impact of energy consumption on environmental degradation: evidence from Australia, China, and USA. Munir K; Riaz N Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Apr; 27(11):11749-11759. PubMed ID: 31975006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]