These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35501880)

  • 41. Novel ambulatory glucose-sensing technology improves hypoglycemia detection and patient monitoring adherence in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes.
    Deeb A; Yousef H; Al Qahtani N; Artan I; Suliman S; Tomy M; Abdulrahman L; Al Suwaidi H; Attia S; Nagelkerke N
    J Diabetes Metab Disord; 2019 Jun; 18(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 31275868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. FreeStyle Libre Flash Glucose Monitoring system for people with type 1 diabetes in the UK: a budget impact analysis.
    Blissett R; Blissett D; Levrat-Guillen F; Deshmukh H; Wilmot EG; Ryder REJ; Walton C; Sathyapalan T
    BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care; 2022 Mar; 10(2):. PubMed ID: 35346970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Mitigation of hypoglycemia during Ramadan using the flash glucose monitoring system following dose adjustment of insulin and sulphonylurea in patients taking multiple glucose-lowering therapies (The PROFAST-IT Study).
    Elhadd T; Bashir M; Baager KA; Ali HA; Almohannadi DHS; Dabbous Z; Malik RA; Abou-Samra AB;
    Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2021 Feb; 172():108589. PubMed ID: 33316309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Assessment of Hyperglycemia, Hypoglycemia and Inter-Day Glucose Variability Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring among Diabetic Patients on Chronic Hemodialysis.
    Divani M; Georgianos PI; Didangelos T; Liakopoulos V; Makedou K; Iliadis F; Savopoulos C; Grekas DM
    J Clin Med; 2021 Sep; 10(18):. PubMed ID: 34575228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Head-to-head comparison between flash and continuous glucose monitoring systems in outpatients with type 1 diabetes.
    Bonora B; Maran A; Ciciliot S; Avogaro A; Fadini GP
    J Endocrinol Invest; 2016 Dec; 39(12):1391-1399. PubMed ID: 27287421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Cost Analysis of FreeStyle Libre
    Oyagüez I; Gómez-Peralta F; Artola S; Carrasco FJ; Carretero-Gómez J; García-Soidan J; Gómez-Huelgas R; Merino-Torres JF; Pérez A
    Diabetes Ther; 2021 Sep; 12(9):2329-2342. PubMed ID: 33948909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Approach to Using Trend Arrows in the FreeStyle Libre Flash Glucose Monitoring Systems in Adults.
    Kudva YC; Ahmann AJ; Bergenstal RM; Gavin JR; Kruger DF; Midyett LK; Miller E; Harris DR
    J Endocr Soc; 2018 Dec; 2(12):1320-1337. PubMed ID: 30474069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The Relationship Between Hemoglobin A1c, Time in Range, and Glycemic Management Indicator in Patients With Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Saudi Arabia.
    Alazmi AA; Brema I; Alzahrani SH; Almehthel MS
    Cureus; 2024 Jul; 16(7):e63947. PubMed ID: 39105008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Association of scan frequency with CGM-derived metrics and influential factors in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus.
    Sakane N; Hirota Y; Yamamoto A; Miura J; Takaike H; Hoshina S; Toyoda M; Saito N; Hosoda K; Matsubara M; Tone A; Kawashima S; Sawaki H; Matsuda T; Domichi M; Suganuma A; Sakane S; Murata T
    Diabetol Int; 2024 Jan; 15(1):109-116. PubMed ID: 38264231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Assessment of Patient-reported Satisfaction and Metabolic Outcomes Following Initiation of the Second Generation of Flash Glucose Monitoring in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes.
    Al Hayek A; Robert AA; Alzahrani WM; Al Dawish MA
    Curr Diabetes Rev; 2024; 20(4):e100823219628. PubMed ID: 37563819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Adherence to glucose monitoring with intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring in patients with type 1 diabetes.
    Sousa C; Neves JS; Dias CC; Sampaio R
    Endocrine; 2023 Mar; 79(3):477-483. PubMed ID: 36574148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Frequency of flash glucose monitoring and glucose metrics: real-world observational data from Saudi Arabia.
    Al-Harbi MY; Albunyan A; Alnahari A; Kao K; Brandner L; El Jammal M; Dunn TC
    Diabetol Metab Syndr; 2022 May; 14(1):66. PubMed ID: 35501880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Flash Glucose Monitoring in Israel: Understanding Real-World Associations between Self-Monitoring Frequency and Metrics of Glycemic Control.
    Eldor R; Roitman E; Merzon E; Toledano Y; Alves C; Tsur A
    Endocr Pract; 2022 May; 28(5):472-478. PubMed ID: 35167952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Real world hypoglycaemia related to glucose variability and Flash glucose scan frequency assessed from global FreeStyle Libre data.
    Riveline JP; Wojtusciszyn A; Guerci B; Alves C; Kao K; Xu Y; Dunn TC
    Diabetes Obes Metab; 2022 Nov; 24(11):2102-2107. PubMed ID: 35695037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Real-world flash glucose monitoring in Brazil: can sensors make a difference in diabetes management in developing countries?
    Calliari LEP; Krakauer M; Vianna AGD; Ram Y; Barbieri DE; Xu Y; Dunn TC
    Diabetol Metab Syndr; 2020; 12():3. PubMed ID: 31921360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.