430 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35501921)
21. Circulating microRNAs as Potential Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of Endometrial Cancer: a Meta-Analysis.
Gao J; Fan YZ; Gao SS; Zhang WT
Reprod Sci; 2023 Feb; 30(2):464-472. PubMed ID: 35764858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Diagnostic Value of MicroRNA-18a for Gastric Cancer: a Meta-Analysis.
Liang Q; Zhang G; Wang J; Sheng S
Clin Lab; 2018 Jan; 64(1):177-184. PubMed ID: 29479894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Serum microRNA-195 as a potential diagnostic biomarker for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Liu Y; Tang D; Zheng S; Su R; Tang Y
Int J Clin Exp Pathol; 2019; 12(11):3982-3991. PubMed ID: 31933794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The value of miR-155 as a biomarker for the diagnosis and prognosis of lung cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis.
Shao C; Yang F; Qin Z; Jing X; Shu Y; Shen H
BMC Cancer; 2019 Nov; 19(1):1103. PubMed ID: 31727002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Diagnostic Accuracy of Serum CA19-9 in Patients with Cholangiocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Liang B; Zhong L; He Q; Wang S; Pan Z; Wang T; Zhao Y
Med Sci Monit; 2015 Nov; 21():3555-63. PubMed ID: 26576628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Performance of matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS) in diagnosis of ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Li K; Pei Y; Wu Y; Guo Y; Cui W
J Ovarian Res; 2020 Jan; 13(1):6. PubMed ID: 31924227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. MicroRNA-21 as a potential biomarker for detecting esophageal carcinoma in Asian populations: a meta-analysis.
Han Z; Pan L; Lu B; Zhu H
PeerJ; 2022; 10():e14048. PubMed ID: 36199284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Diagnostic Value of Serum IgG4 for IgG4-Related Disease: A PRISMA-compliant Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Hao M; Liu M; Fan G; Yang X; Li J
Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 May; 95(21):e3785. PubMed ID: 27227950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Diagnostic significance assessment of the circulating cell-free DNA in ovarian cancer: An updated meta-analysis.
Li B; Pu K; Ge L; Wu X
Gene; 2019 Sep; 714():143993. PubMed ID: 31330238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Diagnostic value of circulating microRNAs for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis based on Asian data.
Zhang WT; Wang YJ; Zhang GX; Zhang YH; Gao SS
Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2023 Sep; 115(9):504-514. PubMed ID: 35040334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Quantitative assessment of the diagnostic role of human telomerase activity from pancreatic juice in pancreatic cancer.
Wang S; Chen X; Tang M
Tumour Biol; 2014 Aug; 35(8):7897-904. PubMed ID: 24828013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. An indirect comparison of automated indirect immunofluorescence vs automated solid-phase immunoassays for antinuclear antibody detection: A meta-analysis and adjusted indirect comparison of diagnostic test accuracy.
Zhang M; Zhang X
Int J Rheum Dis; 2022 Sep; 25(9):991-1002. PubMed ID: 35726725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The value of serum Cyfra21-1 as a biomarker in the diagnosis of patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis.
Cui C; Sun X; Zhang J; Han D; Gu J
J Cancer Res Ther; 2014 Nov; 10 Suppl():C131-4. PubMed ID: 25450270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The diagnostic accuracy of HE4 in lung cancer: a meta-analysis.
Cheng D; Sun Y; He H
Dis Markers; 2015; 2015():352670. PubMed ID: 25873748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A meta-analysis of the diagnostic value of microRNA-1246 for malignant tumors.
Xie C; Huang T; Teng Z; Xu S; Bu J; Li M; Zhang Y; Zhang J
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 May; 98(22):e15848. PubMed ID: 31145333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The clinical utility of microRNA-21 as novel biomarker for diagnosing human cancers.
Shen L; Wan Z; Ma Y; Wu L; Liu F; Zang H; Xin S
Tumour Biol; 2015 Mar; 36(3):1993-2005. PubMed ID: 25431259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Diagnostic value of human epididymis protein 4 compared with mesothelin for ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lin JY; Qin JB; Li XY; Dong P; Yin BD
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2012; 13(11):5427-32. PubMed ID: 23317195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Diagnostic accuracy of the Copenhagen Index in ovarian malignancy: A meta-analysis.
Liu H; Ma S; Chen X; Wu H; Wang R; Du M; Nie X
PLoS One; 2023; 18(6):e0286650. PubMed ID: 37315054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Diagnostic and predictive value of liquid biopsy-derived exosome miR-21 for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wang M; Wang Y; Tian X; Wang Q; Huang H; Lu X; Qi M; Cao X; Lei J
Expert Rev Mol Diagn; 2023 Apr; 23(4):315-324. PubMed ID: 36992655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Diagnostic value of optical imaging combined with indocyanine green-guided sentinel lymph node biopsy in gastric cancer: a meta-analysis].
He MF; Jiang ZW; Hao ZW; An J; Zhai J; Shen JK
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Dec; 22(12):1196-1204. PubMed ID: 31874538
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
