149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35502018)
1. The Pentacam® AXL Wave provides a reliable wavefront-based objective refraction when compared to manifest subjective refraction: A prospective study.
Balparda K; Acevedo-Urrego A; Silva-Quintero LA; Herrera-Chalarca T
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2022 May; 70(5):1533-1537. PubMed ID: 35502018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of a simple-to-use, affordable, portable, wavefront aberrometry-based auto refractometer in the adult population: A prospective study.
Rao DP; Negiloni K; Gurunathan S; Velkumar S; Sivaraman A; Baig AU; Kumari B; Murali K
BMC Ophthalmol; 2022 Dec; 22(1):498. PubMed ID: 36536321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Wavefront aberrometry repeatability and agreement-A comparison between Pentacam AXL Wave, iTrace and OPD-Scan III.
Wan KH; Liao XL; Yu M; Tsui RWY; Chow VWS; Chong KKL; Chan TCY
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2022 Nov; 42(6):1326-1337. PubMed ID: 36102169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Wavefront analysis in post-LASIK eyes and its correlation with visual symptoms, refraction, and topography.
Chalita MR; Chavala S; Xu M; Krueger RR
Ophthalmology; 2004 Mar; 111(3):447-53. PubMed ID: 15019317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An alternative clinical routine for subjective refraction based on power vectors with trial frames.
María Revert A; Conversa MA; Albarrán Diego C; Micó V
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Jan; 37(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 28030877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of WASCA Aberrometer Refraction Compared to Manifest Refraction and Cycloplegic Refraction in Hyperopia Measurement.
Fu D; Ding X; Shang J; Yu Z; Zhou X
Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2020 Oct; 9(11):5. PubMed ID: 33101782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Agreement and variability of subjective refraction, autorefraction, and wavefront aberrometry in pseudophakic patients.
Ruiss M; Findl O; Draschl P; Harrer-Seely A; Hirnschall N
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2021 Aug; 47(8):1056-1063. PubMed ID: 34292891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of wavefront aberrometer refraction vs manifest refraction in cataract patients: impact of age, ametropia and visual function.
Huelle JO; Katz T; Draeger J; Pahlitzsch M; Druchkiv V; Steinberg J; Richard G; Linke SJ
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2013 Apr; 251(4):1163-73. PubMed ID: 23292274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical Evaluation Of a 0.05 D-step Binocular Wavefront Optometer in Young Adults in China.
Cheng M; Chen X; Lei Y; Li B; Jiang Y; Xu Y; Zhou X; Wang X
Clin Exp Optom; 2024 May; 107(4):395-401. PubMed ID: 36794379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The precision of wavefront refraction compared to subjective refraction and autorefraction.
Pesudovs K; Parker KE; Cheng H; Applegate RA
Optom Vis Sci; 2007 May; 84(5):387-92. PubMed ID: 17502821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluating refraction and visual acuity with the Nidek autorefractometer AR-360A in a randomized population-based screening study.
Stoor K; Karvonen E; Liinamaa J; Saarela V
Acta Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 96(4):384-389. PubMed ID: 29193822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Method of determining a patient's subjective refraction based on objective measurement.
Lai S; Gomez N; Wei J
J Refract Surg; 2004; 20(5):S528-32. PubMed ID: 15523970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of multifocal contact lens over-refraction using an infrared, open-field autorefractor: A preliminary study.
Giner A; Aldaba M; Arjona M; Vilaseca M; Pujol J
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2015 Oct; 38(5):322-6. PubMed ID: 25907202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reliability and reproducibility of a handheld videorefractor.
Ogbuehi KC; Almaliki WH; AlQarni A; Osuagwu UL
Optom Vis Sci; 2015 May; 92(5):632-41. PubMed ID: 25822015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ametropia detection using a novel, compact wavefront autorefractor.
Hernández CS; Gil A; Zaytouny A; Casares I; Poderoso J; de Lara A; Wehse A; Dave SR; Lim D; Lage E; Alejandre-Alba N
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2024 Mar; 44(2):311-320. PubMed ID: 38084770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical Evaluation of the 3nethra Aberro Handheld Autorefractometer.
Perumal S; Venkatramanan S; Rj V; T J; Adithya J; Abraham A; Cherian H
J Ophthalmic Vis Res; 2022; 17(4):536-542. PubMed ID: 36620713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of a traditional and wavefront autorefraction.
Lebow KA; Campbell CE
Optom Vis Sci; 2014 Oct; 91(10):1191-8. PubMed ID: 25198541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Agreement between refractive and corneal astigmatism in pseudophakic eyes.
Tejedor J; Guirao A
Cornea; 2013 Jun; 32(6):783-90. PubMed ID: 23132451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. COMPARISON OF SMARTPHONE-BASED AND AUTOMATED REFRACTION WITH SUBJECTIVE REFRACTION FOR SCREENING OF REFRACTIVE ERRORS.
Ee CL; Samsudin A
Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2022 Oct; 29(5):588-594. PubMed ID: 34620023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical Accuracy of the Nidek ARK-1 Autorefractor.
Paudel N; Adhikari S; Thakur A; Shrestha B; Loughman J
Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Jun; 96(6):407-413. PubMed ID: 31107837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
