146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35502960)
1. Complication Profile of Total Submuscular Versus Prepectoral Tissue Expander Placement: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Soni SE; Le NK; Buller M; Modica AD; Kumar A; Smith PD; Laronga C
Ann Plast Surg; 2022 Jun; 88(5 Suppl 5):S439-S442. PubMed ID: 35502960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Early Complications after Prepectoral Tissue Expander Placement in Breast Reconstruction with and without Acellular Dermal Matrix.
Pires G; Marquez JL; Memmott S; Sudduth JD; Moss W; Eddington D; Hobson G; Tuncer F; Agarwal JP; Kwok AC
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2024 Jun; 153(6):1221-1229. PubMed ID: 37285211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prepectoral versus Subpectoral Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction: A Historically Controlled, Propensity Score-Matched Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes.
Haddock NT; Kadakia Y; Liu Y; Teotia SS
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Jul; 148(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 34003807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dual-Plane versus Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction in High-Body Mass Index Patients.
Gabriel A; Sigalove S; Storm-Dickerson TL; Sigalove NM; Pope N; Rice J; Maxwell GP
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 Jun; 145(6):1357-1365. PubMed ID: 32195862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prepectoral versus Submuscular Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Matched-Pair Comparison of Outcomes.
Talwar AA; Lanni MA; Ryan IA; Kodali P; Bernstein E; McAuliffe PB; Broach RB; Serletti JM; Butler PD; Fosnot J
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2024 Feb; 153(2):281e-290e. PubMed ID: 37159266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction Without the Use of Acellular Dermal Matrix: A 3-Year Review.
Poveromo LP; Franck P; Ellison A; Janhofer DE; Asadourian PA; Otterburn DM
Ann Plast Surg; 2022 May; 88(3 Suppl 3):S205-S208. PubMed ID: 35513321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Safety Profile and Predictors of Aesthetic Outcomes After Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction With Meshed Acellular Dermal Matrix.
Belmonte BM; Campbell CA
Ann Plast Surg; 2021 Jun; 86(6S Suppl 5):S585-S592. PubMed ID: 34100818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Early Functional Outcomes After Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Case-Matched Cohort Study.
Schaeffer CV; Dassoulas KR; Thuman J; Campbell CA
Ann Plast Surg; 2019 Jun; 82(6S Suppl 5):S399-S403. PubMed ID: 30570559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prepectoral and Subpectoral Tissue Expander-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Propensity-Matched Analysis of 90-Day Clinical and Health-Related Quality-of-Life Outcomes.
Nelson JA; Shamsunder MG; Vorstenbosch J; Polanco TO; Matros E; Coriddi MR; Mehrara BJ; Allen RJ; Dayan JH; Disa JJ
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2022 Apr; 149(4):607e-616e. PubMed ID: 35103644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reducing Expansion Visits in Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Study of Prepectoral and Subpectoral Expander Placement.
Wormer BA; Valmadrid AC; Ganesh Kumar N; Al Kassis S; Rankin TM; Kaoutzanis C; Higdon KK
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Aug; 144(2):276-286. PubMed ID: 31348326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of Drain Placement on Infection, Seroma, and Return to Operating Room in Expander-Based Breast Reconstruction.
Ollech CJ; Block LM; Afifi AM; Poore SO
Ann Plast Surg; 2017 Dec; 79(6):536-540. PubMed ID: 28671886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of Dermal Matrix Brand in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Outcomes.
Johnson AC; Colakoglu S; Siddikoglu D; Li A; Kaoutzanis C; Cohen JB; Chong TW; Mathes DW
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2022 Jul; 150(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 35499525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Human, Porcine, and Bovine Acellular Dermal Matrix in Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Scoping Review.
Pires GR; Moss WD; Hosein RC; Overschmidt BT; Magno-Padron DA; Agarwal JP; McFarland MM; Casucci T; Kwok AC
Ann Plast Surg; 2022 Dec; 89(6):694-702. PubMed ID: 36416706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Do we need acellular dermal matrix in prepectoral breast reconstruction? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Nolan IT; Farajzadeh MM; Boyd CJ; Bekisz JM; Gibson EG; Salibian AA
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2023 Nov; 86():251-260. PubMed ID: 37793198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Propensity Score-Matched Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes in Prepectoral Smooth Versus Textured Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction.
Perez K; Rodnoi P; Teotia SS; Haddock NT
Ann Plast Surg; 2023 May; 90(5S Suppl 3):S242-S251. PubMed ID: 37227405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. From Salvage to Prevention: A Single-Surgeon Experience with Acellular Dermal Matrix and Infection in Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction.
Powers JM; Reuter Muñoz KD; Parkerson J; Nigro LC; Blanchet NP
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Dec; 148(6):1201-1208. PubMed ID: 34644266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of Radiation on Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction in Prepectoral Versus Submuscular Planes.
Thuman JM; Worbowtiz N; Jain A; Ulm JP; Delaney KO; Herrera FA
Ann Plast Surg; 2021 Jun; 86(6S Suppl 5):S560-S566. PubMed ID: 34100813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Picking the Right Plane: A Comparison of Total Submuscular, Dual-Plane, and Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.
Bekisz JM; Salibian AA; Frey JD; Choi M; Karp NS
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2022 Oct; 150(4):737e-746e. PubMed ID: 35862095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Air versus Saline: The Effect of Tissue Expander Fill on Outcomes of Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction.
Yesantharao PS; Rizk N; Martin SA; Tevlin R; Lee GK; Nazerali RS
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2022 Jul; 150(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 35499585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the Safety of a GalaFLEX-AlloDerm Construct in Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction.
Sigalove S; O'Rorke E; Maxwell GP; Gabriel A
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2022 Oct; 150():75S-81S. PubMed ID: 35943912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
