These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35503408)

  • 1. Conceptual generalisation in fear conditioning using single and multiple category exemplars as conditional stimuli - electrodermal responses and valence evaluations generalise to the broader category.
    Patterson RR; Lipp OV; Luck CC
    Cogn Emot; 2022 Jun; 36(4):630-642. PubMed ID: 35503408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Examining conceptual generalisation after acquisition, extinction, and reinstatement in evaluative conditioning.
    Patterson RR; Lipp OV; Luck CC
    Cogn Emot; 2024 Oct; ():1-23. PubMed ID: 39370675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of presenting additional stimuli resembling the CS+ during extinction on extinction retention and generalisation to novel stimuli.
    Waters AM; Ryan KM; Luck CC; Craske MG; Lipp OV
    Behav Res Ther; 2021 Sep; 144():103921. PubMed ID: 34214823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of instructions on reversing the generalization of valence, US expectancy, and electrodermal responding in fear conditioning.
    Patterson RR; Lipp OV; Luck CC
    Psychophysiology; 2024 Jan; 61(1):e14429. PubMed ID: 37661638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Generalization and Extinction of Concept-BasedPain-Related Fear.
    Glogan E; van Vliet C; Roelandt R; Meulders A
    J Pain; 2019 Mar; 20(3):325-338. PubMed ID: 30296613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Presentation of unpaired unconditional stimuli during extinction reduces renewal of conditional fear and slows re-acquisition.
    Lipp OV; Ryan KM; Luck CC; Craske MG; Waters AM
    Psychophysiology; 2021 Oct; 58(10):e13899. PubMed ID: 34231228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of cross unconditional stimulus reinstatement on electrodermal responding and conditional stimulus valence in differential fear conditioning.
    Luck CC; Patterson RR; Lipp OV
    Psychophysiology; 2023 Aug; 60(8):e14278. PubMed ID: 36929597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Be careful what you say! - Evaluative change based on instructional learning generalizes to other similar stimuli and to the wider category.
    Luck CC; Patterson RR; Lipp OV
    Cogn Emot; 2021 Feb; 35(1):169-184. PubMed ID: 32907472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Approximating exposure therapy in the lab: Replacing the CS+ with a similar versus a different stimulus and including additional stimuli resembling the CS+ during extinction.
    Waters AM; Ryan KM; Luck CC; Craske MG; Lipp OV
    Behav Res Ther; 2023 Aug; 167():104357. PubMed ID: 37364363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Conditional stimulus choices affect fear learning: Comparing fear conditioning with neutral faces and shapes or angry faces.
    Ney LJ; Luck CC; Waters AM; Lipp OV
    Psychophysiology; 2022 Oct; 59(10):e14068. PubMed ID: 35477888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluative conditioning affects the subsequent acquisition of differential fear conditioning as indexed by electrodermal responding and stimulus evaluations.
    Lipp OV; Luck CC; Muir AC
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Mar; 57(3):e13505. PubMed ID: 31736088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Verbal instructions targeting valence alter negative conditional stimulus evaluations (but do not affect reinstatement rates).
    Luck CC; Lipp OV
    Cogn Emot; 2018 Feb; 32(1):61-80. PubMed ID: 28141482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Attention avoidance of the threat conditioned stimulus during extinction increases physiological arousal generalisation and retention.
    O'Malley KR; Waters AM
    Behav Res Ther; 2018 May; 104():51-61. PubMed ID: 29549751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. To remove or not to remove? Removal of the unconditional stimulus electrode does not mediate instructed extinction effects.
    Luck CC; Lipp OV
    Psychophysiology; 2015 Sep; 52(9):1248-56. PubMed ID: 26032171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reinstatement of fear in humans: autonomic and experiential responses in a differential conditioning paradigm.
    Kull S; Müller BH; Blechert J; Wilhelm FH; Michael T
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 May; 140(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 22445769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of instructions on generalised valence - conditional stimulus instructions after evaluative conditioning update the explicit and implicit evaluations of generalisation stimuli.
    Patterson RR; Lipp OV; Luck CC
    Cogn Emot; 2023; 37(4):666-682. PubMed ID: 36967641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Generalization of extinction of a generalization stimulus in fear learning.
    Wong AHK; Lovibond PF
    Behav Res Ther; 2020 Feb; 125():103535. PubMed ID: 31883479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Verbalisation of attention regulation strategies and background music enhance extinction learning and retention.
    Waters AM; McCann A; Kapnias R; Dingle G
    Behav Res Ther; 2022 Mar; 150():104037. PubMed ID: 35066366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The absence of differential electrodermal responding in the second half of acquisition does not indicate the absence of fear learning.
    Lipp OV; Luck CC; Waters AM
    Psychophysiology; 2022 Mar; 59(3):e13982. PubMed ID: 34846758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modeling Hierarchical Versus Random Exposure Schedules in Pavlovian Fear Extinction: No Evidence for Differential Fear Outcomes.
    Scheveneels S; Boddez Y; Vervliet B; Hermans D
    Behav Ther; 2019 Sep; 50(5):967-977. PubMed ID: 31422851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.