126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35503556)
1. Characterization of bone metastases detected on
Önner H; Yılmaz F
Hell J Nucl Med; 2022; 25(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 35503556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [
Janssen JC; Woythal N; Meißner S; Prasad V; Brenner W; Diederichs G; Hamm B; Makowski MR
Mol Imaging Biol; 2017 Dec; 19(6):933-943. PubMed ID: 28707038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bone scintigraphy as a gatekeeper for the detection of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer: comparison with Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT.
Caglar M; Tuncel M; Yildiz E; Karabulut E
Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Dec; 34(12):932-941. PubMed ID: 32975741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How accurate is
Erdem S; Simsek DH; Degirmenci E; Aydin R; Bagbudar S; Ozluk Y; Sanli Y; Sanli O; Ozcan F
Urol Oncol; 2022 Jan; 40(1):6.e1-6.e9. PubMed ID: 34400066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Staging
Kesler M; Kerzhner K; Druckmann I; Kuten J; Levine C; Sarid D; Keizman D; Yossepowitch O; Even-Sapir E
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2022 May; 49(6):2077-2085. PubMed ID: 34957528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7.
von Eyben FE; Picchio M; von Eyben R; Rhee H; Bauman G
Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Sep; 4(5):686-693. PubMed ID: 28753806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical parameters and nomograms for predicting lymph node metastasis detected with
Onal C; Ozyigit G; Oymak E; Guler OC; Hurmuz P; Tilki B; Reyhan M; Tuncel M; Akyol F
Prostate; 2021 Jul; 81(10):648-656. PubMed ID: 33949694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Risk of metastatic disease on
Yaxley JW; Raveenthiran S; Nouhaud FX; Samaratunga H; Yaxley WJ; Coughlin G; Yaxley AJ; Gianduzzo T; Kua B; McEwan L; Wong D
BJU Int; 2019 Sep; 124(3):401-407. PubMed ID: 31141284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relationships between serum PSA levels, Gleason scores and results of 68Ga-PSMAPET/CT in patients with recurrent prostate cancer.
Sanli Y; Kuyumcu S; Sanli O; Buyukkaya F; İribaş A; Alcin G; Darendeliler E; Ozluk Y; Yildiz SO; Turkmen C
Ann Nucl Med; 2017 Nov; 31(9):709-717. PubMed ID: 28900854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reproducibility of PSMA PET/CT Imaging for Primary Staging of Treatment-Naïve Prostate Cancer Patients Depends on the Applied Radiotracer: A Retrospective Study.
Hagens MJ; Oprea-Lager DE; Vis AN; Wondergem M; Donswijk ML; Meijer D; Emmett L; van Leeuwen PJ; van der Poel HG
J Nucl Med; 2022 Oct; 63(10):1531-1536. PubMed ID: 36008118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT derived quantitative volumetric tumor parameters for classification and evaluation of therapeutic response of bone metastases in prostate cancer patients.
Schmidkonz C; Cordes M; Goetz TI; Prante O; Kuwert T; Ritt P; Uder M; Wullich B; Goebell P; Bäuerle T
Ann Nucl Med; 2019 Oct; 33(10):766-775. PubMed ID: 31338731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Relationship between the SUVmax Value Obtained in Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT and Lactate Dehydrogenase and Alkaline Phosphatase in Prostate Cancer.
Ertürk SA; Şalk İ; Yücel B; Ulaş Babacan Ö; Hasbek Z
Arch Esp Urol; 2022 Aug; 75(6):552-558. PubMed ID: 36138505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bone Uptake in Prostate Cancer Patients: Diagnostic Performances of PSMA-RADS v1.0, Clinical, Biological, and 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET Features to Predict Metastasis After Biochemical Recurrence.
Letang A; Crombé A; Rousseau C; Sargos P; Merlin C; Cantarel C; Cazeau AL
Clin Nucl Med; 2022 Aug; 47(8):e529-e539. PubMed ID: 35543633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Primary lymph-node staging with
Corona-Montes VE; González-Cuenca E; Fernández-Noyola G; Olarte-Casas MA; Bobadilla-Salazar D; Medrano-Urtecho HM; Asimakopoulos AD
Urol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 39(8):494.e1-494.e6. PubMed ID: 33223371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ga-PSMA PET/CT Staging of Newly Diagnosed Intermediate- and High-Risk Prostate Cancer.
Kuten J; Mabjeesh NJ; Lerman H; Levine C; Barnes S; Even-Sapir E
Isr Med Assoc J; 2019 Feb; 21(2):100-104. PubMed ID: 30772960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Correlations of
Topuz ÖV; Aksu A; Erinç SR; Tamam MÖ
Hell J Nucl Med; 2021; 24(1):60-65. PubMed ID: 33866340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Gallium-68-prostate-specific membrane antigen (
van Leeuwen PJ; Donswijk M; Nandurkar R; Stricker P; Ho B; Heijmink S; Wit EMK; Tillier C; van Muilenkom E; Nguyen Q; van der Poel HG; Emmett L
BJU Int; 2019 Jul; 124(1):62-68. PubMed ID: 30074667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The role of histopathological and biochemical parameters for predicting metastatic disease on
Aydos U; Çetin S; Akdemir ÜÖ; Budak FÇ; Ateş SG; Koparal MY; Gönül İI; Gülbahar Ö; Sözen S; Atay LÖ
Prostate; 2021 Dec; 81(16):1337-1348. PubMed ID: 34516677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A prospective intra-individual comparison of [
Lawal IO; Mokoala KMG; Mahapane J; Kleyhans J; Meckel M; Vorster M; Ebenhan T; Rösch F; Sathekge MM
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2021 Jan; 48(1):134-142. PubMed ID: 32424485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
