270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35503960)
1. Feasibility and Assessment of a Hybrid Audiology Service Delivery Model for Older Adult Hearing Aid Users: A Pilot Study.
Arnold ML; Schwartz B; Neil H; Chisolm TH; Sanchez VA
Am J Audiol; 2022 Sep; 31(3S):892-904. PubMed ID: 35503960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Remote or in-clinic? The effect of service delivery mode on hearing aid output: study protocol for a double-blinded, randomised trial in adults with mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss.
Lett C; Welch D; Dobson R
Trials; 2024 Apr; 25(1):256. PubMed ID: 38610038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Perceptions Toward Internet-Based Delivery of Hearing Aids among Older Hearing-Impaired Adults.
Chandra N; Searchfield GD
J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Jun; 27(6):441-457. PubMed ID: 27310403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Characteristics of hearing aid fittings in infants and young children.
McCreery RW; Bentler RA; Roush PA
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(6):701-10. PubMed ID: 23575463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Remote Hearing Aid Support: The Next Frontier.
Angley GP; Schnittker JA; Tharpe AM
J Am Acad Audiol; 2017; 28(10):893-900. PubMed ID: 29130437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Identifying clients' readiness for hearing rehabilitation within initial audiology appointments: a pilot intervention study.
Ekberg K; Barr C
Int J Audiol; 2020 Aug; 59(8):606-614. PubMed ID: 32141783
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The Effects of Service-Delivery Model and Purchase Price on Hearing-Aid Outcomes in Older Adults: A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.
Humes LE; Rogers SE; Quigley TM; Main AK; Kinney DL; Herring C
Am J Audiol; 2017 Mar; 26(1):53-79. PubMed ID: 28252160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Feasibility of ecological momentary assessment of hearing difficulties encountered by hearing aid users.
Galvez G; Turbin MB; Thielman EJ; Istvan JA; Andrews JA; Henry JA
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):497-507. PubMed ID: 22531573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Experienced hearing aid users' perspectives of assessment and communication within audiology: a qualitative study using digital methods.
Parmar BJ; Mehta K; Vickers DA; Bizley JK
Int J Audiol; 2022 Nov; 61(11):956-964. PubMed ID: 34821527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Initial-fit approach versus verified prescription: comparing self-perceived hearing aid benefit.
Abrams HB; Chisolm TH; McManus M; McArdle R
J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(10):768-78. PubMed ID: 23169194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Follow-Up Clinical Trial Evaluating the Consumer-Decides Service Delivery Model.
Humes LE; Kinney DL; Main AK; Rogers SE
Am J Audiol; 2019 Mar; 28(1):69-84. PubMed ID: 30938563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Differences in Word and Phoneme Recognition in Quiet, Sentence Recognition in Noise, and Subjective Outcomes between Manufacturer First-Fit and Hearing Aids Programmed to NAL-NL2 Using Real-Ear Measures.
Valente M; Oeding K; Brockmeyer A; Smith S; Kallogjeri D
J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Sep; 29(8):706-721. PubMed ID: 30222541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluating the short-term and long-term effects of an internet-based aural rehabilitation programme for hearing aid users in general clinical practice: a randomised controlled trial.
Malmberg M; Lunner T; Kähäri K; Andersson G
BMJ Open; 2017 Jun; 7(5):e013047. PubMed ID: 28592571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Performance-Perceptual Test (PPT) and its relationship to aided reported handicap and hearing aid satisfaction.
Saunders GH; Forsline A
Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):229-42. PubMed ID: 16672792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Are two ears not better than one?
McArdle RA; Killion M; Mennite MA; Chisolm TH
J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Mar; 23(3):171-81. PubMed ID: 22436115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prescribing and Verifying Hearing Aids Applying the American Academy of Audiology Pediatric Amplification Guideline: Protocols and Outcomes from the Ontario Infant Hearing Program.
Bagatto M; Moodie S; Brown C; Malandrino A; Richert F; Clench D; Scollie S
J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Mar; 27(3):188-203. PubMed ID: 26967361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Process of Developing an Internet-Based Support System for Audiologists and First-Time Hearing Aid Clients.
Brännström KJ; Öberg M; Ingo E; Månsson KN; Andersson G; Lunner T; Laplante-Lévesque A
Am J Audiol; 2015 Sep; 24(3):320-4. PubMed ID: 26649539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measurement of hearing aid outcome in the elderly: comparison between young and old elderly.
Chang WH; Tseng HC; Chao TK; Hsu CJ; Liu TC
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Jun; 138(6):730-4. PubMed ID: 18503844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improving self-efficacy for hearing aid self-management: the early delivery of a multimedia-based education programme in first-time hearing aid users.
Gomez R; Ferguson M
Int J Audiol; 2020 Apr; 59(4):272-281. PubMed ID: 31651206
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Patient Uptake, Experience, and Satisfaction Using Web-Based and Face-to-Face Hearing Health Services: Process Evaluation Study.
Ratanjee-Vanmali H; Swanepoel W; Laplante-Lévesque A
J Med Internet Res; 2020 Mar; 22(3):e15875. PubMed ID: 32196459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
