These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35503961)
1. Comparison of Accuracy and Time for Four Implant Placement Techniques Supporting Fixed-Partial Denture. Deeb JG; Kanduti D; Skrjanc L; Carrico CK; Deeb G J Oral Implantol; 2022 Dec; 48(6):562-572. PubMed ID: 35503961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of guided implant placement learning experiences on freehand skills: A pilot study. Carrico C; Skrjanc L; Kanduti D; Deeb G; Deeb JG Clin Exp Dent Res; 2024 Apr; 10(2):e878. PubMed ID: 38506282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of implant placement using a mixed reality-based dynamic navigation system versus static computer-assisted and freehand surgery: An in Vitro study. Shusterman A; Nashef R; Tecco S; Mangano C; Lerner H; Mangano FG J Dent; 2024 Jul; 146():105052. PubMed ID: 38734298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Exploring training dental implant placement using computer-guided implant navigation system for predoctoral students: A pilot study. Golob Deeb J; Bencharit S; Carrico CK; Lukic M; Hawkins D; Rener-Sitar K; Deeb GR Eur J Dent Educ; 2019 Nov; 23(4):415-423. PubMed ID: 31141291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of a dynamic navigation device on the accuracy of implant placement in the completely edentulous mandible: An in vitro study. Feng Y; Yao Y; Yang X J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Nov; 130(5):731-737. PubMed ID: 35000696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of dynamic navigation compared to static surgical guides and the freehand approach in implant placement: a prospective clinical study. Younis H; Lv C; Xu B; Zhou H; Du L; Liao L; Zhao N; Long W; Elayah SA; Chang X; He L Head Face Med; 2024 May; 20(1):30. PubMed ID: 38745297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of static computer-assisted implant placement in long span edentulous area by novice implant clinicians: A cross-sectional in vitro study comparing fully-guided, pilot-guided, and freehand implant placement protocols. Abduo J; Lau D Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2021 Jun; 23(3):361-372. PubMed ID: 33817957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of a Dynamic Dental Implant Navigation System in a Private Practice. Stefanelli LV; DeGroot BS; Lipton DI; Mandelaris GA Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(1):205–213. PubMed ID: 30521660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Factors influencing transfer accuracy of cone beam CT-derived template-based implant placement. Behneke A; Burwinkel M; Behneke N Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Apr; 23(4):416-23. PubMed ID: 22092586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Immediate implant placement in the posterior mandibular region was assisted by dynamic real-time navigation: a retrospective study. Geng N; Ren J; Zhang C; Zhou T; Feng C; Chen S BMC Oral Health; 2024 Feb; 24(1):208. PubMed ID: 38336661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of dynamic implant navigation surgery performed by a novice operator. Marques-Guasch J; Rodriguez-Bauzá R; Satorres-Nieto M; Hom-Lay W; Hernández-Alfaro F; Gargallo-Albiol J Int J Comput Dent; 2022 Nov; 25(4):377-385. PubMed ID: 35060374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of a dynamic navigation system for training students in dental implant placement. Zhan Y; Wang M; Cheng X; Li Y; Shi X; Liu F J Dent Educ; 2021 Feb; 85(2):120-127. PubMed ID: 32914421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of dental implant placement using static versus dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery: An in vitro study. Taheri Otaghsara SS; Joda T; Thieringer FM J Dent; 2023 May; 132():104487. PubMed ID: 36948382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A clinically relevant accuracy study of computer-planned implant placement in the edentulous maxilla using mucosa-supported surgical templates. Verhamme LM; Meijer GJ; Boumans T; de Haan AF; Bergé SJ; Maal TJ Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Apr; 17(2):343-52. PubMed ID: 23879524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of operator experience on the accuracy of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical templates: an in vitro study. Cushen SE; Turkyilmaz I J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):248-54. PubMed ID: 23566606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of Implant Placement with a Navigation System, a Laboratory Guide, and Freehand Drilling. Chen CK; Yuh DY; Huang RY; Fu E; Tsai CF; Chiang CY Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(6):1213-1218. PubMed ID: 30427951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A retrospective study of dynamic navigation system-assisted implant placement. Ma L; Ye M; Wu M; Chen X; Shen S BMC Oral Health; 2023 Oct; 23(1):759. PubMed ID: 37838655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the accuracy of two different dynamic navigation system registration methods for dental implant placement: A retrospective study. Ma F; Sun F; Wei T; Ma Y Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2022 Jun; 24(3):352-360. PubMed ID: 35536921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dynamic navigation for dental implant placement in single-tooth gaps: A preclinical pilot investigation. Böse MWH; Beuer F; Schwitalla A; Bruhnke M; Herklotz I J Dent; 2022 Oct; 125():104265. PubMed ID: 35995082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy assessment of dynamic navigation during implant placement: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies in the last 10 years. Yu X; Tao B; Wang F; Wu Y J Dent; 2023 Aug; 135():104567. PubMed ID: 37263412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]