140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35504247)
1. Effect of Proximity to the Modiolus for the Cochlear CI532 Slim Modiolar Electrode Array on Evoked Compound Action Potentials and Programming Levels.
Greisiger R; Heldahl MG; Myhrum M; Sørensen TM; Dammerud JJ; Rasmussen K; Korslund H; Bunne M; Jablonski GE
Audiol Neurootol; 2022; 27(5):397-405. PubMed ID: 35504247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cochlear Implantation with the CI512 and CI532 Precurved Electrode Arrays: One-Year Speech Recognition and Intraoperative Thresholds of Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potentials.
Videhult Pierre P; Eklöf M; Smeds H; Asp F
Audiol Neurootol; 2019; 24(6):299-308. PubMed ID: 31846976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Perimodiolar Electrodes: Imaging and Electrophysiological Outcomes.
Mewes A; Brademann G; Hey M
Otol Neurotol; 2020 Aug; 41(7):e934-e944. PubMed ID: 32658111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. SpeedCAP: An Efficient Method for Estimating Neural Activation Patterns Using Electrically Evoked Compound Action-Potentials in Cochlear Implant Users.
Garcia C; Deeks JM; Goehring T; Borsetto D; Bance M; Carlyon RP
Ear Hear; 2023 May-Jun 01; 44(3):627-640. PubMed ID: 36477611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intraoperative Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential Growth and Maximum Amplitudes in Hearing Preservation Cochlear Implant Recipients.
Mussoi BS; Woodson E; Sydlowski S
Otol Neurotol; 2023 Apr; 44(4):e216-e222. PubMed ID: 36946363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Investigating the association of electrically-evoked compound action potential thresholds with inner-ear dimensions in pediatric cochlear implantation.
Söderqvist S; Sivonen V; Lamminmäki S; Ylönen J; Markkola A; Sinkkonen ST
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 Jul; 158():111160. PubMed ID: 35544967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Possibilities for residual hearing preservation with Nucleus CI532 Slim Modiolar electrode array. Case report].
Nagy R; Jarabin JA; Dimák B; Perényi Á; Tóth F; Szűts V; Jóri J; Kiss JG; Rovó L
Orv Hetil; 2018 Oct; 159(41):1680-1688. PubMed ID: 30295044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Effect of Electrode Position on Behavioral and Electrophysiologic Measurements in Perimodiolar Cochlear Implants.
Collins A; Foghsgaard S; Druce E; Margani V; Mejia O; O'Leary S
Otol Neurotol; 2024 Mar; 45(3):238-244. PubMed ID: 38238914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) in cochlear implant children: Changes in auditory nerve response in first year of cochlear implant use.
Telmesani LM; Said NM
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Mar; 82():28-33. PubMed ID: 26857311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Electric compound action potentials (ECAPs) and impedances in an open and closed operative site during cochlear implantation.
Christov F; Gluth MB; Lahti SJ; Ludwig S; Hans S; Holtmann LC; Lang S; Arweiler-Harbeck D
Cochlear Implants Int; 2019 Jan; 20(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 30350745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cochlear implantees: Analysis of behavioral and objective measures for a clinical population of various age groups.
Greisiger R; Shallop JK; Hol PK; Elle OJ; Jablonski GE
Cochlear Implants Int; 2015; 16 Suppl 4():1-19. PubMed ID: 26642899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Relationship between electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds and behavioral T-levels in implanted children with cochlear nerve deficiency.
Chao X; Wang R; Luo J; Wang H; Fan Z; Xu L
Sci Rep; 2023 Mar; 13(1):4309. PubMed ID: 36922582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Objective, audiological and quality of life measures with the CI532 slim modiolar electrode.
Hey M; Wesarg T; Mewes A; Helbig S; Hornung J; Lenarz T; Briggs R; Marx M; Ramos A; Stöver T; Escudé B; James CJ; Aschendorff A
Cochlear Implants Int; 2019 Mar; 20(2):80-90. PubMed ID: 30465637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. ART and AutoART ECAP measurements and cochlear nerve anatomy as predictors in adult cochlear implant recipients.
Schrank L; Nachtigäller P; Müller J; Hempel JM; Canis M; Spiegel JL; Rader T
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Jul; 281(7):3461-3473. PubMed ID: 38219245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Toward a battery of behavioral and objective measures to achieve optimal cochlear implant stimulation levels in children.
Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV
Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):447-63. PubMed ID: 15599192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Packing of the cochleostomy site affects auditory nerve response thresholds in precurved off-stylet cochlear implants.
Gordin A; Papsin B; Gordon K
Otol Neurotol; 2010 Feb; 31(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 20101160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Toward a method of achieving balanced stimulation of bilateral auditory nerves: Evidence from children receiving matched and unmatched bilateral cochlear implants simultaneously.
Tsai P; Wisener N; Papsin BC; Cushing SL; Gordon KA
Hear Res; 2022 Mar; 416():108445. PubMed ID: 35104716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Characteristics of responsiveness of cochlear nerve to electrical stimulation in patients with cochlear nerve deficiency].
Chao XH; Luo JF; Wang RJ; Fan ZM; Wang HB; Xu L
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2023 Jul; 58(7):657-665. PubMed ID: 37455110
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds and loudness estimates for the stimuli used to program the Advanced Bionics cochlear implant.
Jeon EK; Brown CJ; Etler CP; O'Brien S; Chiou LK; Abbas PJ
J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Jan; 21(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 20085196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessing the Electrode-Neuron Interface with the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential, Electrode Position, and Behavioral Thresholds.
DeVries L; Scheperle R; Bierer JA
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2016 Jun; 17(3):237-52. PubMed ID: 26926152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
