These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3550481)

  • 1. Medical Review of North Carolina--update on Medicare review.
    Godehn DJ
    N C Med J; 1987 Feb; 48(2):61-2. PubMed ID: 3550481
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A peer review issue.
    Boyette CO
    N C Med J; 1989 Dec; 50(12):718-9. PubMed ID: 2691895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ethical issues associated with peer review in Medicare.
    Schneider KC
    Qual Assur Util Rev; 1988 May; 3(2):37-41. PubMed ID: 2980925
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The peer review process.
    Mann BA
    West J Med; 1989 Nov; 151(5):561. PubMed ID: 2603425
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. KePRO emphasizes quality in peer review.
    Pa Med; 1986 Apr; 89(4):41-2, 44. PubMed ID: 3703561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How close is North Carolina to meeting Medicare's clinical priorities?
    Kelley M; McArdle J; Weiser R; Simpson R
    N C Med J; 2001; 62(4):212-9. PubMed ID: 11468985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A challenge: can physicians continue to control the review of medical services?
    Sohmer MF; Bass CM
    N C Med J; 1978 May; 39(5):295-6. PubMed ID: 275556
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Panel eyeing Medicare quality, PRO effectiveness.
    Wagner L
    Mod Healthc; 1987 Nov; 17(23):16. PubMed ID: 10324873
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. PRO success vital to good public image.
    Harrop DE
    Pa Med; 1988 Nov; 91(11):22. PubMed ID: 3194140
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quality improvement in medicare.
    Turkel RA
    J Fla Med Assoc; 1995 Aug; 82(8):563-4. PubMed ID: 7561735
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Medicare program; peer review organization contracts: solicitation of statements of interest from in-state organizations--Alaska, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Kentucky, Maine, Nebraska, Nevada, South Carolina, Vermont, and Wyoming--HCFA. Notice.
    Fed Regist; 1998 Jul; 63(145):40534-6. PubMed ID: 10181715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Medicare program; description of the Health Care Financing Administration's evaluation methodology for the Peer Review Organization 5th Scope of Work contracts--HCFA. General notice with comment period.
    Fed Regist; 1997 Jul; 62(127):35824-6. PubMed ID: 10169018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The President's address. The crisis.
    Gilbert GG
    N C Med J; 1973 Jul; 34(7):503-9. PubMed ID: 4516763
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. AHQA report highlights shifting role of PROs.
    Hosp Peer Rev; 2000 Dec; 25(12):170-2, 158. PubMed ID: 11188112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The importance of documentation in peer review.
    Kingsley DI
    N J Med; 1989 Mar; 86(3):185-6. PubMed ID: 2704433
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Providers question PROs' effectiveness. Critics contend peer review organizations are too costly and fail to improve the quality of care.
    Rothschild RD
    Health Prog; 1992; 73(6):28-32, 38. PubMed ID: 10119535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Confessions of a PRO reviewer.
    Fleischer LR
    Pa Med; 1989 Oct; 92(10):36. PubMed ID: 2812804
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Medicare program; Peer Review Organizations: revised scopes of work for Delaware, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Jersey, Nevada, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Washington, and Wyoming--HCFA. Final notice.
    Fed Regist; 1991 Sep; 56(171):43790-3. PubMed ID: 10113846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The changing focus of peer review under Medicare.
    Mellette PM
    Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1986 Dec; 8(10):7-48. PubMed ID: 10301158
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quality focus retools peer review panels.
    Gardner J
    Mod Healthc; 1996 Jun; 26(26):97. PubMed ID: 10158348
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.