These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 355050)

  • 61. Contraception and family planning: finding the best method. Part one.
    Lippman D
    Nurs Care; 1977 Jul; 10(7):36-8. PubMed ID: 586609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. [The end of IUD marketing in the United States: what does it mean for American women?].
    Forrest JD
    Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1987 Mar; 15(3):291-300. PubMed ID: 12341479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Life-table methods for contraceptive research.
    Farley TM
    Stat Med; 1986; 5(5):475-89. PubMed ID: 3538263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. The Pearl Pregnancy Index reexamined: still useful for clinical trials of contraceptives.
    Shelton JD; Taylor RN
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Mar; 139(5):592-6. PubMed ID: 7008615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Variability in Contraceptive Clinical Trial Design and the Challenges in Making Comparisons Across Trials.
    Portman D; Eisenberg DL; Cason P; Howard B
    Adv Ther; 2021 Nov; 38(11):5425-5430. PubMed ID: 34559358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Statistical comparison of Pearl rates.
    Higgins JE; Wilkens LR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Mar; 151(5):656-9. PubMed ID: 3883780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. The effectiveness of the cervical cap as a contraceptive method.
    TIETZE C; LEHFELDT H; LIEBMANN HG
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1953 Oct; 66(4):904-8. PubMed ID: 13092177
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. New methods of mathematical analysis for studies of intrauterine contraception.
    Dueñas JL; Albert A; Carrasco F; Aroca JM
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1996 Sep; 68(1-2):143-6. PubMed ID: 8886697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. [EXPERIENCES WITH ORAL CONTRACEPTIVES].
    BARADLAIBANK E
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1964 Jul; 86():987-90. PubMed ID: 14253029
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Life table analysis of the effectiveness of contraceptive methods using an APL computer program.
    Cooper DL; Winter J
    Int J Biomed Comput; 1978 Jan; 9(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 627419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. A clinical evaluation of a monthly injection for conception control.
    Keifer WS; Lee AF; Scott JC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1970 Jun; 107(3):400-10. PubMed ID: 4910699
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Short and long term effects of various contraceptives on ovaries.
    Sen Gupta A; Poddar DL; Sarkar SK; Chakravorty D
    J Obstet Gynaecol India; 1977 Apr; 27(2):183-7. PubMed ID: 923992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. The prevention of unwanted pregnancies in a Japanese village by contraceptive from tablets.
    KOYA Y; KOYA T
    Milbank Mem Fund Q; 1960 Apr; 38():167-70. PubMed ID: 14459055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Methodological pitfalls in the analysis of contraceptive failure.
    Trussell J
    Stat Med; 1991 Feb; 10(2):201-20. PubMed ID: 2052800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. [Intra-uterine foreign body consisting of a fragment of a contraceptive device].
    LABRY R; GOUTELLE A; ROUSSET LP
    Lyon Med; 1961 Jan; 93():217-8. PubMed ID: 13758039
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. [Clinical evaluation of a new mechanical contraceptive made of elastomer].
    GROBEL' VF; TELNOVA RP
    Pediatr Akus Ginekol; 1962; 5():63-4. PubMed ID: 13950617
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS OF A CONTRACEPTIVE CREAM.
    ROVINSKY JJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 1964 Jan; 23():125-31. PubMed ID: 14110045
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Evaluation of a new contraceptive cream-jel based on long-term usage.
    FINKELSTEIN R; GOLDBERG RB
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1959 Sep; 78():657-60. PubMed ID: 13822913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Clarifications concerning contraceptive mobile app Pearl Index calculations.
    Lundberg O; Berglund Scherwitzl E; Kopp Kallner H; Gemzell Danielsson K; Trussell J; Scherwitzl R
    Contraception; 2018 May; 97(5):456-457. PubMed ID: 29408366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. More clarity needed for contraceptive mobile app Pearl Index calculations.
    Schimmoeller N; Creinin MD
    Contraception; 2018 May; 97(5):456. PubMed ID: 29408365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.