These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35505178)

  • 1. A measure of individual differences in readers' approaches to text and its relation to reading experience and reading comprehension.
    Calloway RC; Helder A; Perfetti CA
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Feb; 55(2):899-931. PubMed ID: 35505178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Learning disabled and average readers' working memory and comprehension: does metacognition play a role?
    Swanson HL; Trahan M
    Br J Educ Psychol; 1996 Sep; 66 ( Pt 3)():333-55. PubMed ID: 8828393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Materials Matter: An Exploration of Text Complexity and Its Effects on Middle School Readers' Comprehension Processing.
    Dahl AC; Carlson SE; Renken M; McCarthy KS; Reynolds E
    Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch; 2021 Apr; 52(2):702-716. PubMed ID: 33784193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Effect of Vocabulary Intervention on Text Comprehension: Who Benefits?
    Duff D
    Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch; 2019 Oct; 50(4):562-578. PubMed ID: 31600473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of prior knowledge and text structure on comprehension processes during reading of scientific texts.
    Kendeou P; Van den Broek P
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Oct; 35(7):1567-77. PubMed ID: 18062535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. From eye movements to scanpath networks: A method for studying individual differences in expository text reading.
    Ma X; Liu Y; Clariana R; Gu C; Li P
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Feb; 55(2):730-750. PubMed ID: 35445941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of letter shape on readers' emotional experience, reading fluency, and text comprehension and memorisation.
    Medved T; Podlesek A; Možina K
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1107839. PubMed ID: 36910813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does mood influence text processing and comprehension? Evidence from an eye-movement study.
    Scrimin S; Mason L
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2015 Sep; 85(3):387-406. PubMed ID: 26010020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Age-related changes in reading comprehension: an individual-differences perspective.
    Hannon B; Daneman M
    Exp Aging Res; 2009 Oct; 35(4):432-56. PubMed ID: 20183100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neurocognitive Signatures of Naturalistic Reading of Scientific Texts: A Fixation-Related fMRI Study.
    Hsu CT; Clariana R; Schloss B; Li P
    Sci Rep; 2019 Jul; 9(1):10678. PubMed ID: 31337859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Why Are Causal and Temporal Connectives Difficult to Understand? A Comparison Between Italian Hearing Good and Poor Comprehenders and Deaf Poor Comprehenders.
    Arfé B; Carretti B; van den Broek P; Benincasa P; Genovese E; Oakhill J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2023 Sep; 66(9):3515-3535. PubMed ID: 37494928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reading skill is related to individual differences in brain structure in college students.
    Welcome SE; Chiarello C; Thompson PM; Sowell ER
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2011 Aug; 32(8):1194-205. PubMed ID: 21523856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of working memory and fluency practice on the reading comprehension of students who are dysfluent readers.
    Swanson HL; O'Connor R
    J Learn Disabil; 2009; 42(6):548-75. PubMed ID: 19745196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Do adult readers know how they read? Evidence from eye movement patterns and verbal reports.
    Hyönä J; Nurminen AM
    Br J Psychol; 2006 Feb; 97(Pt 1):31-50. PubMed ID: 16464286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reading comprehension of deaf readers. The impact of too many or too few questions.
    LaSasso CJ
    Am Ann Deaf; 1993 Dec; 138(5):435-41. PubMed ID: 8135162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of individual differences in text exposure on sentence comprehension.
    Stoops A; Montag JL
    Sci Rep; 2023 Oct; 13(1):16812. PubMed ID: 37798346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Readers accurately monitor their incidental word learning success during silent reading.
    Upadhyay SSN; Brusnighan SM; Folk JR
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2022 Aug; 228():103653. PubMed ID: 35777309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Beyond readability: investigating coherence of clinical text for consumers.
    Smith CA; Hetzel S; Dalrymple P; Keselman A
    J Med Internet Res; 2011 Dec; 13(4):e104. PubMed ID: 22138127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of look-backs in the processing of written sarcasm.
    Olkoniemi H; Johander E; Kaakinen JK
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Jan; 47(1):87-105. PubMed ID: 30168095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Readers' beliefs about text comprehension affect the quality of their summaries of a scientific article].
    Wada Y; Ueda K
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2013 Apr; 84(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 23705236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.