142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35505673)
1. An extended multi-criteria group decision-making method with psychological factors and bidirectional influence relation for emergency medical supplier selection.
Liu S; He X; Chan FTS; Wang Z
Expert Syst Appl; 2022 Sep; 202():117414. PubMed ID: 35505673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Extended Multicriteria Group Decision Making with a Novel Aggregation Operator for Emergency Material Supplier Selection.
Liu L; Zhu Q; Yang D; Liu S
Entropy (Basel); 2023 Apr; 25(4):. PubMed ID: 37190490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sustainable supply chain partner selection and order allocation: A hybrid fuzzy PL-TODIM based MCGDM approach.
Zhong S; Zhang J; He X; Liu S
PLoS One; 2022; 17(9):e0271194. PubMed ID: 36137146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Green supplier selection for textile industry: a case study using BWM-TODIM integration under interval type-2 fuzzy sets.
Celik E; Yucesan M; Gul M
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Dec; 28(45):64793-64817. PubMed ID: 34313933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An extended TODIM approach for group emergency decision making based on bidirectional projection with hesitant triangular fuzzy sets.
Ding Q; Wang YM; Goh M
Comput Ind Eng; 2021 Jan; 151():106959. PubMed ID: 36568584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A novel hybrid multi-criteria group decision-making approach with intuitionistic fuzzy sets to design reverse supply chains for COVID-19 medical waste recycling channels.
Liu S; Zhang J; Niu B; Liu L; He X
Comput Ind Eng; 2022 Jul; 169():108228. PubMed ID: 35601730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A collaborative emergency decision making approach based on BWM and TODIM under interval 2-tuple linguistic environment.
Qi K; Chai H; Duan Q; Du Y; Wang Q; Sun J; Liew KM
Int J Mach Learn Cybern; 2022; 13(2):383-405. PubMed ID: 34567279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A novel fuzzy framework for technology selection of sustainable wastewater treatment plants based on TODIM methodology in developing urban areas.
Eseoglu G; Yapsakli K; Tozan H; Vayvay O
Sci Rep; 2022 May; 12(1):8800. PubMed ID: 35614159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A dynamic generalized fuzzy multi-criteria croup decision making approach for green supplier segmentation.
Duc DA; Van LH; Yu VF; Chou SY; Hien NV; Chi NT; Toan DV; Dat LQ
PLoS One; 2021; 16(1):e0245187. PubMed ID: 33493184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A multi-criteria group decision-making framework for investment assessment of offshore floating wind-solar-aquaculture project under probabilistic linguistic environment.
Mao Q; Guo M; Lv J; Chen J; Tian M
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Mar; 30(14):40752-40782. PubMed ID: 36622615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An integrated multi-criteria decision making approach with linguistic hesitant fuzzy sets for E-learning website evaluation and selection.
Gong JW; Liu HC; You XY; Yin L
Appl Soft Comput; 2021 Apr; 102():107118. PubMed ID: 36570416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An efficiency-based interval type-2 fuzzy multi-criteria group decision making for makeshift hospital selection.
Chen ZH; Wan SP; Dong JY
Appl Soft Comput; 2022 Jan; 115():108243. PubMed ID: 34899106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fermatean Fuzzy Schweizer-Sklar Operators and BWM-Entropy-Based Combined Compromise Solution Approach: An Application to Green Supplier Selection.
Wei D; Meng D; Rong Y; Liu Y; Garg H; Pamucar D
Entropy (Basel); 2022 May; 24(6):. PubMed ID: 35741498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Supplier selection in healthcare supply chain management during the COVID-19 pandemic: a novel fuzzy rough decision-making approach.
Pamucar D; Torkayesh AE; Biswas S
Ann Oper Res; 2022 Jan; ():1-43. PubMed ID: 35039705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A model for green-resilient supplier selection: fuzzy best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method and its applications.
Hailiang Z; Khokhar M; Islam T; Sharma A
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Apr; 30(18):54035-54058. PubMed ID: 36869951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Interactive multi-criteria group decision-making with probabilistic linguistic information for emergency assistance of COVID-19.
Wan SP; Huang Cheng WB; Dong JY
Appl Soft Comput; 2021 Aug; 107():107383. PubMed ID: 35721366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TODIM methods for landfill location selection.
Hanine M; Boutkhoum O; Tikniouine A; Agouti T
Springerplus; 2016; 5():501. PubMed ID: 27186465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute group decision-making method considering risk preference of decision-makers and its application.
Fu S; Xiao YZ; Zhou HJ
Sci Rep; 2022 Jul; 12(1):11597. PubMed ID: 35804077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A novel two-phase group decision-making model for circular supplier selection under picture fuzzy environment.
Kaya SK
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Mar; 30(12):34135-34157. PubMed ID: 36508096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An optimized multi-attribute decision-making approach to construction supply chain management by using complex picture fuzzy soft set.
Asghar A; Khan KA; Albahar MA; Alammari A
PeerJ Comput Sci; 2023; 9():e1540. PubMed ID: 37705663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
