127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35506474)
1. Flash-free and conventional adhesive ceramic brackets in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Daraqel B; Yingying T; Zheng L
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2023 Feb; 26(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 35506474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of adhesive flash-free brackets on debonding pain and time: A randomized split-mouth clinical trial.
Çokakoğlu S; Tan A
Angle Orthod; 2020 Nov; 90(6):758-765. PubMed ID: 33378510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative assessment of bonding time and 1-year bracket survival using flash-free and conventional adhesives for orthodontic bracket bonding: A split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial.
Grünheid T; Larson BE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Nov; 154(5):621-628. PubMed ID: 30384932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Particulate production during debonding of fixed appliances: Laboratory investigation and randomized clinical trial to assess the effect of using flash-free ceramic brackets.
Vig P; Atack NE; Sandy JR; Sherriff M; Ireland AJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Jun; 155(6):767-778. PubMed ID: 31153497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparative assessment of bracket survival and adhesive removal time using flash-free or conventional adhesive for orthodontic bracket bonding: A split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial.
Grünheid T; Larson BE
Angle Orthod; 2019 Mar; 89(2):299-305. PubMed ID: 30230375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Debonding and adhesive remnant cleanup: an in vitro comparison of bond quality, adhesive remnant cleanup, and orthodontic acceptance of a flash-free product.
Grünheid T; Sudit GN; Larson BE
Eur J Orthod; 2015 Oct; 37(5):497-502. PubMed ID: 25548144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of self-etch primers with conventional acid-etch technique for bonding brackets in orthodontics: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kerayechian N; Bardideh E; Bayani S
Eur J Orthod; 2022 Aug; 44(4):385-395. PubMed ID: 35022707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of debonding characteristics of a new collapsible ceramic bracket.
Bishara SE; Olsen ME; Von Wald L
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Nov; 112(5):552-9. PubMed ID: 9387843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of different bonding and debonding techniques on debonding ceramic orthodontic brackets.
Sinha PK; Nanda RS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Aug; 112(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 9267223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Construction of an
Goyal S; Kulkarni N; Naik A; Naik B
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2022 Feb; 23(2):193-201. PubMed ID: 35748449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Enamel around orthodontic brackets coated with flash-free and conventional adhesives.
ElSherifa MT; Shamaa MS; Montasser MA
J Orofac Orthop; 2020 Nov; 81(6):419-426. PubMed ID: 32696069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the debonding characteristics of two innovative ceramic bracket designs.
Bishara SE; Olsen ME; VonWald L; Jakobsen JR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Jul; 116(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 10393585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of surface treatments and flash-free adhesive on the shear bond strength of ceramic orthodontic brackets to CAD/CAM provisional materials.
Soliman TA; Ghorab S; Baeshen H
Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Jan; 26(1):481-492. PubMed ID: 34605975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of failure characteristics and bond strength after ceramic and polycarbonate bracket debonding: effect of bracket base silanization.
Ozcan M; Finnema K; Ybema A
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Apr; 30(2):176-82. PubMed ID: 18209212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the failure rate, bonding time and ARI score of two orthodontic bonding systems: Self-Etch Primer and Conventional Etching Primer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Namdari M; Amdjadi P; Bayat A; Seifi M; Alzwghaibi A
Int Orthod; 2021 Dec; 19(4):566-579. PubMed ID: 34629307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Light energy transmission through six different makes of ceramic orthodontic brackets.
Aldossary MS; Abu Hajia SS; Santini A
Int Orthod; 2018 Dec; 16(4):638-651. PubMed ID: 30385291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of Diode Laser Debonding of Ceramic Brackets on Enamel Surface and Pulpal Temperature.
Yassaei S; Soleimanian A; Nik ZE
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 Apr; 16(4):270-4. PubMed ID: 26067728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of the different debonding strength of metal and ceramic brackets on the degree of enamel microcrack healing.
Nimplod P; Tansalarak R; Sornsuwan T
Dental Press J Orthod; 2021; 26(3):e2119177. PubMed ID: 34190770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of adhesive flash-free brackets on enamel demineralization and periodontal status.
Tan A; Çokakoğlu S
Angle Orthod; 2020 May; 90(3):339-346. PubMed ID: 33378441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Adhesive precoated bracket systems and operator coated bracket systems: Is there any difference?
Alakttash AM; Fawzi M; Bearn D
Angle Orthod; 2019 May; 89(3):495-504. PubMed ID: 30556748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
