These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35506474)

  • 41. Evaluation of stresses developed in different bracket-cement-enamel systems using finite element analysis with in vitro bond strength tests.
    Elsaka SE; Hammad SM; Ibrahim NF
    Prog Orthod; 2014 Apr; 15(1):33. PubMed ID: 24934213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Bond strength and debonding characteristics of a new ceramic bracket.
    Liu JK; Chung CH; Chang CY; Shieh DB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):761-5; quiz 802. PubMed ID: 16360918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Ex vivo bond strength of adhesive precoated metallic and ceramic brackets.
    Bearn DR; Aird JC; McCabe JF
    Br J Orthod; 1995 Aug; 22(3):233-6. PubMed ID: 7577872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Physical and adhesive properties of dental enamel after radiotherapy and bonding of metal and ceramic brackets.
    Santin GC; Palma-Dibb RG; Romano FL; de Oliveira HF; Nelson Filho P; de Queiroz AM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Aug; 148(2):283-92. PubMed ID: 26232837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Effects of different debonding techniques on the debonding forces and failure modes of ceramic brackets in simulated clinical set-ups.
    Chen HY; Su MZ; Chang HF; Chen YJ; Lan WH; Lin CP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):680-6. PubMed ID: 18005844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Evaluation of the bond strength of different bracket-bonding systems to bovine enamel.
    Nkenke E; Hirschfelder U; Martus P; Eberhard H
    Eur J Orthod; 1997 Jun; 19(3):259-70. PubMed ID: 9239956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Effect of universal adhesive and silane pretreatment on bond durability of metal brackets to dental glass ceramics.
    Yu J; Zhang Z; Yang H; Wang Y; Muhetaer A; Lei J; Huang C
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2021 Apr; 129(2):e12772. PubMed ID: 33829577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Comparison of adhesive seal morphology between APC™ PLUS and APC™ Flash-Free Adhesive Coated brackets].
    Jung A; Egloff B; Schweitzer T; Aranda L; Rapin C; Albuisson E; Filleul MP
    Orthod Fr; 2018 Jun; 89(2):191-197. PubMed ID: 30040618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Light energy attenuation through orthodontic ceramic brackets at different irradiation times.
    Santini A; Tiu SH; McGuinness NJ; Aldossary MS
    J Orthod; 2016 Sep; 43(3):193-201. PubMed ID: 27487476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. In vitro evaluation of microleakage under ceramic and metal brackets bonded with LED and plasma arc curing.
    Davari A; Yassaei S; Karandish M; Zarghami F
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Sep; 13(5):644-9. PubMed ID: 23250168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding.
    Millett DT; Cattanach D; McFadzean R; Pattison J; McColl J
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):58-63; discussion 64. PubMed ID: 10022186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Comparative study of excess glue around metallic APC™ Flash-Free adhesive system].
    Akl R; Ghoubril J; Zgheib G; Le Gall M; Philip-Alliez C
    Orthod Fr; 2022 Sep; 93(3):249-258. PubMed ID: 36217584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Shear bond strength of metallic and ceramic brackets using color change adhesives.
    Stumpf Ade S; Bergmann C; Prietsch JR; Vicenzi J
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2013; 18(2):76-80. PubMed ID: 23916435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Clinical comparison of an adhesive precoated vs. an uncoated ceramic bracket system.
    Verstrynge A; Ghesquiere A; Willems G
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2004 Feb; 7(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 14989750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Microleakage under metallic and ceramic brackets bonded with orthodontic self-etching primer systems.
    Uysal T; Ulker M; Ramoglu SI; Ertas H
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Nov; 78(6):1089-94. PubMed ID: 18947278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. In vitro Analysis of Shear Bond Strength and Adhesive Remnant Index of Stainless Steel Brackets with Different Adhesive Systems to Enamel.
    Vaheed NA; Gupta M; David SA; Sam G; Ramanna PK; Bhagvandas SC
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Sep; 19(9):1047-1051. PubMed ID: 30287702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Bond strength of disinfected metal and ceramic brackets: an in vitro study.
    Speer C; Zimny D; Hopfenmueller W; Holtgrave EA
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Sep; 75(5):836-42. PubMed ID: 16279832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Evaluation of enamel surfaces after bracket debonding: an in-vivo study with scanning electron microscopy.
    Alessandri Bonetti G; Zanarini M; Incerti Parenti S; Lattuca M; Marchionni S; Gatto MR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):696-702. PubMed ID: 22051490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The extent of enamel surface fractures. A quantitative comparison of thermally debonded ceramic and mechanically debonded metal brackets by energy dispersive micro- and image-analysis.
    Stratmann U; Schaarschmidt K; Wegener H; Ehmer U
    Eur J Orthod; 1996 Dec; 18(6):655-62. PubMed ID: 9009430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Shear/peel bond strength of repositioned ceramic brackets.
    Gaffey PG; Major PW; Glover K; Grace M; Koehler JR
    Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(5):351-7. PubMed ID: 8526294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.