BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35507309)

  • 21. Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.
    ; Bibbins-Domingo K; Grossman DC; Curry SJ; Davidson KW; Epling JW; García FAR; Gillman MW; Harper DM; Kemper AR; Krist AH; Kurth AE; Landefeld CS; Mangione CM; Owens DK; Phillips WR; Phipps MG; Pignone MP; Siu AL
    JAMA; 2016 Jun; 315(23):2564-2575. PubMed ID: 27304597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Interval Colorectal Cancer Incidence Among Subjects Undergoing Multiple Rounds of Fecal Immunochemical Testing.
    van der Vlugt M; Grobbee EJ; Bossuyt PMM; Bos A; Bongers E; Spijker W; Kuipers EJ; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Spaander MCW; Dekker E
    Gastroenterology; 2017 Aug; 153(2):439-447.e2. PubMed ID: 28483499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Options for screening for colorectal cancer.
    Atkin W
    Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl; 2003; (237):13-6. PubMed ID: 12797674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Faecal immunochemical tests versus guaiac faecal occult blood tests: what clinicians and colorectal cancer screening programme organisers need to know.
    Tinmouth J; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Allison JE
    Gut; 2015 Aug; 64(8):1327-37. PubMed ID: 26041750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Colon cancer screening and surveillance controversies.
    Lieberman D
    Curr Opin Gastroenterol; 2009 Sep; 25(5):422-7. PubMed ID: 19465849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Alternatives to colonoscopy for population-wide colorectal cancer screening.
    Leung WC; Foo DC; Chan TT; Chiang MF; Lam AH; Chan HH; Cheung CC
    Hong Kong Med J; 2016 Feb; 22(1):70-7. PubMed ID: 26744124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Colorectal cancer screening.
    Bretthauer M
    J Intern Med; 2011 Aug; 270(2):87-98. PubMed ID: 21575082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Noninvasive strategies for colorectal cancer screening: opportunities and limitations.
    Lou S; Shaukat A
    Curr Opin Gastroenterol; 2021 Jan; 37(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 33074994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Health benefits and cost-effectiveness of a hybrid screening strategy for colorectal cancer.
    Dinh T; Ladabaum U; Alperin P; Caldwell C; Smith R; Levin TR
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 Sep; 11(9):1158-66. PubMed ID: 23542330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Epi proColon
    Shirley M
    Mol Diagn Ther; 2020 Aug; 24(4):497-503. PubMed ID: 32557236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Screening for Colorectal Cancer and Evolving Issues for Physicians and Patients: A Review.
    Lieberman D; Ladabaum U; Cruz-Correa M; Ginsburg C; Inadomi JM; Kim LS; Giardiello FM; Wender RC
    JAMA; 2016 Nov; 316(20):2135-2145. PubMed ID: 27893135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer in the general population.
    Frazier AL; Colditz GA; Fuchs CS; Kuntz KM
    JAMA; 2000 Oct; 284(15):1954-61. PubMed ID: 11035892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effectiveness of Screening Modalities in Colorectal Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis.
    Zhang J; Cheng Z; Ma Y; He C; Lu Y; Zhao Y; Chang X; Zhang Y; Bai Y; Cheng N
    Clin Colorectal Cancer; 2017 Dec; 16(4):252-263. PubMed ID: 28687458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cost-effectiveness of colonoscopy in screening for colorectal cancer.
    Sonnenberg A; Delcò F; Inadomi JM
    Ann Intern Med; 2000 Oct; 133(8):573-84. PubMed ID: 11033584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Update on Flexible Sigmoidoscopy, Computed Tomographic Colonography, and Capsule Colonoscopy.
    Chung SW; Hakim S; Siddiqui S; Cash BD
    Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2020 Jul; 30(3):569-583. PubMed ID: 32439089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Screening for Colorectal Cancer: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
    Lin JS; Piper MA; Perdue LA; Rutter CM; Webber EM; O'Connor E; Smith N; Whitlock EP
    JAMA; 2016 Jun; 315(23):2576-94. PubMed ID: 27305422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening colonoscopy vs. sigmoidoscopy and alternative strategies.
    Sharaf RN; Ladabaum U
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Jan; 108(1):120-32. PubMed ID: 23247579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Screening for colorectal neoplasms with new fecal occult blood tests: update on performance characteristics.
    Allison JE; Sakoda LC; Levin TR; Tucker JP; Tekawa IS; Cuff T; Pauly MP; Shlager L; Palitz AM; Zhao WK; Schwartz JS; Ransohoff DF; Selby JV
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Oct; 99(19):1462-70. PubMed ID: 17895475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Diagnostic performance of flexible sigmoidoscopy combined with fecal immunochemical test in colorectal cancer screening: meta-analysis and modeling.
    Niedermaier T; Weigl K; Hoffmeister M; Brenner H
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2017 Jun; 32(6):481-493. PubMed ID: 28667446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparative effectiveness of screening strategies for colorectal cancer.
    Barzi A; Lenz HJ; Quinn DI; Sadeghi S
    Cancer; 2017 May; 123(9):1516-1527. PubMed ID: 28117881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.