These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35507760)

  • 1. Attending to the Positive: A Retrospective Validation of the Structured Assessment of Protective Factors-Sexual Offence Version.
    Nolan T; Willis GM; Thornton D; Kelley SM; Christofferson SB
    Sex Abuse; 2023 Mar; 35(2):241-260. PubMed ID: 35507760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Factors Predicting Desistance From Reoffending: A Validation Study of the SAPROF in Sexual Offenders.
    Yoon D; Turner D; Klein V; Rettenberger M; Eher R; Briken P
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2018 Feb; 62(3):697-716. PubMed ID: 27531703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing protective factors for sexually violent offending with the SAPROF.
    de Vries Robbé M; de Vogel V; Koster K; Bogaerts S
    Sex Abuse; 2015 Feb; 27(1):51-70. PubMed ID: 25210106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Risk Assessment in Juvenile and Young Adult Offenders: Predictive Validity of the SAVRY and SAPROF-YV.
    Kleeven ATH; de Vries Robbé M; Mulder EA; Popma A
    Assessment; 2022 Mar; 29(2):181-197. PubMed ID: 32964720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Protective factors in the prediction of criminal outcomes for youth with sexual offenses using tools developed for adults and adolescents: Tests of direct effects and moderation of risk.
    Langton CM; Awrey MJ; Worling JR
    Psychol Assess; 2023 Jun; 35(6):497-509. PubMed ID: 36862457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing protective factors of youth who sexually offended in singapore: preliminary evidence on the utility of the DASH-13 and the SAPROF.
    Zeng G; Chu CM; Lee Y
    Sex Abuse; 2015 Feb; 27(1):91-108. PubMed ID: 25527632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for violence risk (SAPROF): A meta-analysis of its predictive and incremental validity.
    Burghart M; de Ruiter C; Hynes SE; Krishnan N; Levtova Y; Uyar A
    Psychol Assess; 2023 Jan; 35(1):56-67. PubMed ID: 36227302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Protective factors and recidivism in accused juveniles who sexually offended.
    Klein V; Rettenberger M; Yoon D; Köhler N; Briken P
    Sex Abuse; 2015 Feb; 27(1):71-90. PubMed ID: 25351199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. High-psychopathy men with a history of sexual offending have protective factors too: But are these risk relevant and can they change in treatment?
    Olver ME; Riemer EK
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 2021 May; 89(5):406-420. PubMed ID: 33829820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Static-99R Is Not Valid For Women: Predictive Validity in 739 Females Who Have Sexually Offended.
    Marshall E; Miller HA; Cortoni F; Helmus LM
    Sex Abuse; 2021 Sep; 33(6):631-653. PubMed ID: 32659180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Risk Assessment in Child Sexual Abusers Working With Children.
    Turner D; Rettenberger M; Yoon D; Klein V; Eher R; Briken P
    Sex Abuse; 2016 Sep; 28(6):572-96. PubMed ID: 25527631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A field study of acute dynamic risk assessment in individuals convicted of sexual offenses.
    Nitsche K; Etzler S; Balas J; Eher R; Rettenberger M
    Psychol Assess; 2022 Jun; 34(6):583-594. PubMed ID: 35298221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing protective factors in treated violent offenders: Associations with recidivism reduction and positive community outcomes.
    Coupland RBA; Olver ME
    Psychol Assess; 2020 May; 32(5):493-508. PubMed ID: 32068419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sexual Violence Risk Assessment With Indigenous Men: Context, Controversies, and Current Findings.
    Olver ME; Stockdale KC
    Curr Psychiatry Rep; 2021 Jul; 23(8):48. PubMed ID: 34196806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Field validity of Static-99R and STABLE-2007 with 4,433 men serving sentences for sexual offences in British Columbia: New findings and meta-analysis.
    Helmus LM; Hanson RK; Murrie DC; Zabarauckas CL
    Psychol Assess; 2021 Jul; 33(7):581-595. PubMed ID: 34014750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dynamic Protective Factors Relevant to Sexual Offending.
    Thornton D; Willis GM; Kelley S
    Curr Psychiatry Rep; 2024 Apr; 26(4):142-150. PubMed ID: 38396235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predictive Validity of Static-99R Among 8,207 Men Convicted of Sexual Crimes in South Korea: A Prospective Field Study.
    Lee SC; Hanson RK; Yoon JS
    Sex Abuse; 2023 Sep; 35(6):687-715. PubMed ID: 36394612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predictive and incremental validity of the Static-99, Static-99R, and STABLE-2007 for sexual recidivism: A diagnostic test accuracy network meta-analysis (DTA-NMA).
    Holper L; Cerullo E; Mokros A; Habermeyer E
    Psychol Assess; 2024 Feb; 36(2):134-146. PubMed ID: 38059959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Less Is More: Using Static-2002R Subscales to Predict Violent and General Recidivism Among Sexual Offenders.
    Babchishin KM; Hanson RK; Blais J
    Sex Abuse; 2016 Apr; 28(3):187-217. PubMed ID: 25667228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Predictive Validity of the Static-99, Static-99R, and Static-2002/R: Which One to Use?
    Reeves SG; Ogloff JRP; Simmons M
    Sex Abuse; 2018 Dec; 30(8):887-907. PubMed ID: 28597720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.