BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35508176)

  • 1. Meta-imputation: An efficient method to combine genotype data after imputation with multiple reference panels.
    Yu K; Das S; LeFaive J; Kwong A; Pleiness J; Forer L; Schönherr S; Fuchsberger C; Smith AV; Abecasis GR
    Am J Hum Genet; 2022 Jun; 109(6):1007-1015. PubMed ID: 35508176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Genotype Imputation from Large Reference Panels.
    Das S; Abecasis GR; Browning BL
    Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet; 2018 Aug; 19():73-96. PubMed ID: 29799802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of genotype imputation strategies using a combined reference panel for chicken population.
    Ye S; Yuan X; Huang S; Zhang H; Chen Z; Li J; Zhang X; Zhang Z
    Animal; 2019 Jun; 13(6):1119-1126. PubMed ID: 30370890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rare variant genotype imputation with thousands of study-specific whole-genome sequences: implications for cost-effective study designs.
    Pistis G; Porcu E; Vrieze SI; Sidore C; Steri M; Danjou F; Busonero F; Mulas A; Zoledziewska M; Maschio A; Brennan C; Lai S; Miller MB; Marcelli M; Urru MF; Pitzalis M; Lyons RH; Kang HM; Jones CM; Angius A; Iacono WG; Schlessinger D; McGue M; Cucca F; Abecasis GR; Sanna S
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2015 Jul; 23(7):975-83. PubMed ID: 25293720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improving power of association tests using multiple sets of imputed genotypes from distributed reference panels.
    Zhou W; Fritsche LG; Das S; Zhang H; Nielsen JB; Holmen OL; Chen J; Lin M; Elvestad MB; Hveem K; Abecasis GR; Kang HM; Willer CJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 2017 Dec; 41(8):744-755. PubMed ID: 28861891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comprehensive evaluation of imputation performance in African Americans.
    Chanda P; Yuhki N; Li M; Bader JS; Hartz A; Boerwinkle E; Kao WH; Arking DE
    J Hum Genet; 2012 Jul; 57(7):411-21. PubMed ID: 22648186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How local reference panels improve imputation in French populations.
    Herzig AF; Velo-Suárez L; ; ; Dina C; Redon R; Deleuze JF; Génin E
    Sci Rep; 2024 Jan; 14(1):370. PubMed ID: 38172507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A flexible and accurate genotype imputation method for the next generation of genome-wide association studies.
    Howie BN; Donnelly P; Marchini J
    PLoS Genet; 2009 Jun; 5(6):e1000529. PubMed ID: 19543373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reconstruction of private genomes through reference-based genotype imputation.
    Mosca MJ; Cho H
    Genome Biol; 2023 Dec; 24(1):271. PubMed ID: 38053191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. EagleImp: fast and accurate genome-wide phasing and imputation in a single tool.
    Wienbrandt L; Ellinghaus D
    Bioinformatics; 2022 Nov; 38(22):4999-5006. PubMed ID: 36130053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of genome-wide imputation of untyped markers and impacts on statistical power for association studies.
    Hao K; Chudin E; McElwee J; Schadt EE
    BMC Genet; 2009 Jun; 10():27. PubMed ID: 19531258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analyzing the Korean reference genome with meta-imputation increased the imputation accuracy and spectrum of rare variants in the Korean population.
    Hwang MY; Choi NH; Won HH; Kim BJ; Kim YJ
    Front Genet; 2022; 13():1008646. PubMed ID: 36506321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Opening the Black Box of Imputation Software to Study the Impact of Reference Panel Composition on Performance.
    Dekeyser T; Génin E; Herzig AF
    Genes (Basel); 2023 Feb; 14(2):. PubMed ID: 36833337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genotype imputation performance of three reference panels using African ancestry individuals.
    Vergara C; Parker MM; Franco L; Cho MH; Valencia-Duarte AV; Beaty TH; Duggal P
    Hum Genet; 2018 Apr; 137(4):281-292. PubMed ID: 29637265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A new strategy for enhancing imputation quality of rare variants from next-generation sequencing data via combining SNP and exome chip data.
    Kim YJ; Lee J; Kim BJ; ; Park T
    BMC Genomics; 2015 Dec; 16():1109. PubMed ID: 26715385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accurate Imputation of Untyped Variants from Deep Sequencing Data.
    Torkamaneh D; Belzile F
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2243():271-281. PubMed ID: 33606262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A resampling-based approach to share reference panels.
    Cavinato T; Rubinacci S; Malaspinas AS; Delaneau O
    Nat Comput Sci; 2024 May; 4(5):360-366. PubMed ID: 38745108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genotype imputation accuracy and the quality metrics of the minor ancestry in multi-ancestry reference panels.
    Shi M; Tanikawa C; Munter HM; Akiyama M; Koyama S; Tomizuka K; Matsuda K; Lathrop GM; Terao C; Koido M; Kamatani Y
    Brief Bioinform; 2023 Nov; 25(1):. PubMed ID: 38221906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation and application of summary statistic imputation to discover new height-associated loci.
    Rüeger S; McDaid A; Kutalik Z
    PLoS Genet; 2018 May; 14(5):e1007371. PubMed ID: 29782485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of genome-wide genotyping and reference panels on rare variants imputation.
    Zheng HF; Ladouceur M; Greenwood CM; Richards JB
    J Genet Genomics; 2012 Oct; 39(10):545-50. PubMed ID: 23089364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.